ICEsoft is on the expert group for JSF 2.0, and we're very interested
in contributing relevant ideas from ICEfaces. Naturally, ICEfaces
will support JSF 2.0 as a JSF platform.
ICEfaces will always provide developers with purely declarative
page design; in the future it may make use of
Hi Mike,
if you want my opinion: I do think that AJAX integration in JSF 2.0
will resemble what you get with DynaFaces somewhat. Trinidad will of
course work with/on this API. I think that the standard will not go as
far as what ICEsoft does - but then, I think that also ICEsoft will
try to be
I have read where Ajax4jsf is dedicated to being aligned with the ajax
implementation specified in JSF 2.0. I would assume that Dynafaces from
SUN is similar. What about Trinidad's PPR mechanism? I had also read
that ICEFaces approach was very different which could be problematic.
I am
Trinidad was always following the current JSF specs.
There are two version of Trinidad 1.0.x = for JSF 1.1.x
Trinidad 1.2.x = for JSF 1.2.x
Once there is an alignment on a unique PPR solution, I am pretty sure
Trinidad will follow that.
-Matthias
On 9/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mike,
JSF 2.0 is in very early stage of development, so it's hard to say. However,
Trinidad was mentioned as a reference for skinning and PPR in the JSR focus
areas, so I think it would look odd if we weren't going to align with it.
However, there's always backward compatibility so there's
5 matches
Mail list logo
