David Steinkopff schrieb:
OK, and what way can LGPLv3 combine with ALv2? That its the license
question about JBoss and MyFaces.
Well I assume, as always, the Apache license is a bsdish license which
means everyone can use the code as long as some rules are followed (keep
the headers intact in
where did u read it ?
On 6/11/07, David Steinkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read LGPLv3/GPLv3 will be compatible with Apache License 2.0. Its in that
case possible to include dependencies to LGPLv3 code?
regards
David
2007/6/10, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, we cannot include
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/GPL-likely-to-regain-Apache-compatibility/0,130061733,339276229,00.htm(english)
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/gplv3_apache_li.html (english)
http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/90483 (german)
for example
regards
David
2007/6/11, Matthias
from the oreilly radar:
snip
It will be possible to merge code under those licenses into GPL3
covered software once the GPL version 3 is really out.
/snip
That reads like GPL3 code can contain Apache/Eclipse licensed code.
Not that Apache code can contain GPL3.
Here is an interesting comment,
here is my email to legal.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200706.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
The reply isn't archived yet, but will be in some minutes, from now.
On 6/11/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from the oreilly radar:
snip
It will be possible
OK, and what way can LGPLv3 combine with ALv2? That its the license question
about JBoss and MyFaces.
2007/6/11, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
here is my email to legal.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200706.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
The reply isn't
No, we cannot include source/binary-dependencies to LGPL code - sorry.
regards,
Martin
On 6/6/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To begin with jboss uses lgpl and that's not compatible with ASF license.
Also frankly I do not want to mess with Jboss stuff cos MyFaces might face
with
I read LGPLv3/GPLv3 will be compatible with Apache License 2.0. Its in that
case possible to include dependencies to LGPLv3 code?
regards
David
2007/6/10, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, we cannot include source/binary-dependencies to LGPL code - sorry.
regards,
Martin
On 6/6/07,
The more I use JSF, the more comfortable I get with some of the 3rd
party open source libraries and the strengths and weaknesses of each.
Until the JSF specification catches up with the common add-on
technologies for JSF, the proverbial wheel is getting re-invented all
the time (PPR, skinning,
Don't know about Seam, RichFaces, or A4J, but I know that integrated
support for facelets is already part of Tobago and Trinidad, and is
planned for the next version of Tomahawk (for which I recently saw
someone create a new branch) by leveraging the infrastructure that
Trinidad provides.
On
10 matches
Mail list logo
