--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19512302.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
. I'd try getting by
without it.
Definitely let us know how it goes.
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19513877.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19519440.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sep 9, 2008, at 1:25 PM, rde8026 wrote:
Is it possible to use active mq 5.1 with the openejb container
rather than
4.1?
It should be possible, though I'm not sure if anyone has tried.
If so what does it take to make this change.
Are you in maven or are you using the lib directory
does it take to make this change.
Are you in maven or are you using the lib directory of a standalone
zip/tar?
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19502515.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:45 PM, rde8026 wrote:
I'm using the standard lib form a zip file...
Ok. In terms of general library upgrading, we generate two files
(dependencies.xml and dependencies.txt) that we put inside of every
openejb-*.jar that says what dependencies the jar has. The
of it in their source. I'd try getting by
without it.
Definitely let us know how it goes.
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19504173.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is it possible to use active mq 5.1 with the open ejb container rather than
4.1?
If so what does it take to make this change.
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5.1-support-tp19400471p19400471.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list
