-----Original Message-----
From: James Knott
Sent: 2008/05/14 5:23 AM
I don't remebber the original, but this one definitely came through
"moderator". Note the two "Delivered-To:" lines.
This is a message I sent as a test using the 'Reply All' button. I use
Gmane to communicate with this group. The copy sent to the newsgroup
"gmane.comp.openoffice.questions" was posted on Mon, 12 May 2008
10:35:23 -0600. The copy you receive on Wed, 14 May 2008 03:01:27 -0700
, which you copied below, was sent to "users@openoffice.org" at the same
time. The delay in you receiving it is due to it having to go through
the moderators which delays the posting of the message 24 to 48 or more
hours.
I suspect the reason for you receiving two copies, one of which is
delayed and moderated, is that people posting through gmane are
accidentally using the 'Reply All' button instead of the 'Reply' button,
thus sending their post to both "gmane.comp.openoffice.questions" and
"users@openoffice.org". The one to gmane is injected immediately to the
list (see Header - X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ ).The one
is users goes through the moderator (see Header - Delivered-To:
moderator for users@openoffice.org ) and is delayed getting to the list.
The two messages you forwarded from Bob Este would indicate that this is
what he has done. They both have the same message ID -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . One was injected to the list by Gmane,
the other went through the moderator.
-------- Original Message --------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from linux.home (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
linux.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B4DC4E for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 May 2008 06:01:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via 206.190.37.188; Wed,
14 May 2008 03:01:27 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [204.16.104.2]
Authentication-Results: mta106.rog.mail.scd.yahoo.com
from=gmail.com; domainkeys=fail (bad sig)
Received: from pop-rog.mail.yahoo2.akadns.net [206.190.36.17] by
linux.home with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(single-drop); Wed, 14 May 2008 06:01:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 204.16.104.2 (HELO openoffice.org) (204.16.104.2)
by mta106.rog.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 14 May 2008 03:01:24
-0700
Received: (qmail 1712 invoked by uid 5000); 14 May 2008 10:01:13
-0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:users@openoffice.org>
Reply-To: users@openoffice.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@openoffice.org
Delivered-To: moderator for users@openoffice.org
Received: (qmail 24190 invoked from network); 12 May 2008 16:35:52
-0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:
Ah0CAJMOKEjRVYT2c2dsb2JhbACKdocYAQwDBAQJDwWUNoQU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,474,1204531200";
d="scan'208";a="10525192"
X-IRONPORT: SCANNED
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Yn3T7E3sKkDYppfvw/PfP3WJbnI7ImQU5KkAU+xOMH0=;
b=eUnfPzIuLiGs+sdZ/w04Eagp/+3N38N0yVE4vHlUvSlUQ+E7mWib8q0fE3/lLL0+4NZDFj1tnjsiTqUC+d+YOYDAE8X75c6zXMHFWYXn7Z/zzu/+Jl4hpIyP4bnukB+TpWHUM6ziYSulINOrQodnXb/eVBehWSrpeQmt86kKrqk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=env+83JWovaSqbi4aQ+eXGzAtcbb8jQYOmXWcDdrResDm7aORFg8VCGwkX9H4cDh1+mTaEDhFxjQBDqSmfLAFecH/u1ZuXjAwK4DIeyUPEKvUnDK66amyekMJ86xzm6SWtsX/h+pyUqHaaivb66ln8yTSTM6vQYHZRdKbIs/dqM=
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:35:23 -0600
From: Larry Gusaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.openoffice.questions
To: users@openoffice.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [users] Re: Download time for open office
On 2008/05/12 3:43 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008 10:16:59 +0100
"mike scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello mike,
To muddy the waters further, I see some of Bob Estes' mail
duplicated, some not. For example, the headers from a duplicated
pair are appended. Same message-id and origination times. Hard to
tell when they hit the list, but the final 'received' lines that
seem to be associated with arrival at the list/moderators are
diffferent.
I see Gmane is involved. Maybe Bob sent each message to the list, via
moderators, and also a copy to gmane.comp.openoffice.questions, not
realising that it's gated to the list.
The question remains, though; Why doesn't everyone see two copies?
I access this group through gmane. As a test I used 'Reply to All' to
reply to this, sending the reply through gmane and to
users@openoffice.org to see if both show up and if everyone gets both
copies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
