Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 3 Nov 2005 at 19:49, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 16:50 -0600, Larry Gusaas wrote: What is misleading about announcing a book? What is misleading is that the author has chosen to send unsolicited commercial email to the list in an attempt to make is t seem

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread Doug Thompson
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 00:53 -0600, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 3 Nov 2005 at 19:49, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 16:50 -0600, Larry Gusaas wrote: What is misleading about announcing a book? What is misleading is that the author has chosen

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread RLShadow
Just a thought, should we find out how much of Mary's book has been lifted verbatim from the Documentation Project, before finding her behavior crass and despicable? In a message dated 11/5/2005 10:09:26 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wonder how much of Mary's

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread James White
On November 4, 2005 01:53 am, Larry Gusaas wrote: I do not see any problem and you have not explained what the problem is. The problem I see is that you are against authors making a living from their work. I suppose you want all music and art to be free as well. - - Larry I. Gusaas, Moose

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread Larry Gusaas
I wish to thank Mr. Singleton and all the authors involved for their fine work on the documentation project. It has been very useful to me in learning the features of OOo. I also wish to thank Mr. Singleton for his ill-informed tirade against 'Free Software For Dummies'. Contrary to his

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread James White
I gotta say, there is nothing wrong with making a living. I do it every day. I work on networks - selling my expertise - using the information gleaned from the newsgroups and other online documentation.I CHARGE for that, if I did not, then I couldn't contribute as a volunteer because I

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread Pete Holsberg
James White wrote: snip But that isn't how I see this case. The book costs $14. Nobody is getting rich. It's a LOT of work to make a book and there are huge costs to consider. And books are certainly beneficial. Should we forbid books about anything opensource? Of course not. The only

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-03 Thread James Greenidge
No I have an objection to users being misled. THere is a manual that put profits back into OOo and I would prefer to think that there are many who do not know that the printed guide from OOo is available. I also object to publishing companies and their authors using this list for UCE. You seem

Re: [users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-03 Thread Larry Gusaas
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 17:37 -0600, Larry Gusaas wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 13:20 -0600, Mary Leete wrote: --- If anyone is looking for a great manual, Free Software For Dummies, includes about 200 pages on OpenOffice.org 2.0. It's newly published and received excellent

[users] Re: [discuss] Re: [users] Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-02 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2 Nov 2005 at 14:54, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 13:20 -0600, Mary Leete wrote: Congratulations to all who worked on OOo 2.0! It's fabulous! If anyone is looking for a great manual, Free Software For Dummies, includes about 200 pages on OpenOffice.org