Tanstaafl wrote:
Cool... I'm looking forward to the day KDE is ready to run on Windows
(laughing as James spills his $beverage all over his keyboard)... ;)
http://kde.org/developerplatform/
The entire KDE Development Platform is built upon the Qt toolkit from Qt Development Frameworks, a
On 2010-03-15 6:40 AM, Andreas Saeger wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Cool... I'm looking forward to the day KDE is ready to run on Windows
(laughing as James spills his $beverage all over his keyboard)... ;)
http://kde.org/developerplatform/
The entire KDE Development Platform is built upon the Qt
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 03/13/10 15:04, Daniel Lewis wrote:
snip
Update: The lady who asked for the help has been helped by those of
us who were willing to CC her because she is not a member of this
mailing list. So the problem has apparently been solved.
snip
OK, so
Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:38:19PM -0500, James Knott wrote:
..snip
The only problem with that is Windows will often hide the extension.
So, where you need it most, you don't see it.
My windows days are long behind me but
On 3/14/2010 12:11 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
Because filing an OOo issue is extraordinarily, ridiculously
overly complicated - unless things have changed drastically since
the last time I tried...
May I ask which public access issue tracking systems you use, or are
familiar with, that you
On 3/14/2010 12:51 AM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
The only problem with that is Windows will often hide the
extension. So, where you need it most, you don't see it.
My windows days are long behind me but I remember an option to
always show extensions.
It's a pre-configured option (to not 'hide
On 2010/03/14 8:32 AM Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 10:12 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 03/14/10 09:05, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 12:09 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix
yourself and then
On 03/14/10 13:08, Larry Gusaas wrote:
snip
He is complaining to the right person. You clipped the attributions in
the message you replied to, which contained the attribution for the part
you replied to. Here is the message you replied to. Compare it to your
reply.
snip
Thank you, Larry, but
On 2010-03-14 2:08 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2010/03/14 8:32 AM Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 10:12 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 03/14/10 09:05, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/14/2010 12:09 AM, Programmer In Training wrote:
I have an idea about that: Maybe you can type the file suffix
It would appear that on Mar 13, Richard Detwiler did say:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Which begs the question - why is that checkbox even there? All it does
is cause this problem (our users have been bit by it a lot too)...
Good question -- not sure why anyone would ever have the need or
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
IMHO any user who does have such a special need should be capable of using
a shell command to rename the file after OO.o is done writing it.
That said, some new users might feel secure seeing visual evidence that
the appropriate file extension will automatically be
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Mar 13, Richard Detwiler did say:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Which begs the question - why is that checkbox even there? All it does
is cause this problem (our users have been bit by it a lot too)...
Good question -- not sure why
On 3/13/2010 4:04 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
For those who used this thread to question the need for the Automatic
file name extension: why don't one of you file an issue and make your
suggestions there? That is how things like this can be changed.
Because filing an OOo issue is extraordinarily,
Because filing an OOo issue is extraordinarily, ridiculously overly
complicated - unless things have changed drastically since the last time
I tried...
Hi,
May I ask which public access issue tracking systems you use, or are
familiar with, that you would say are easy to use?
Thanks
Drew
On 03/13/10 15:04, Daniel Lewis wrote:
snip
Update: The lady who asked for the help has been helped by those of
us who were willing to CC her because she is not a member of this
mailing list. So the problem has apparently been solved.
snip
OK, so what was the problem and how did it get
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:38:19PM -0500, James Knott wrote:
..snip
The only problem with that is Windows will often hide the extension.
So, where you need it most, you don't see it.
My windows days are long behind me but I remember an option to always
show
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:22 PM [GMT+1=CET], Guy Voets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
No CC anywhere, and all say Send by OOo
maybe the difference is 2x the same answer to address?
I can *always* CC to the OP, but that gets tiring in the end.
Any suggestions?
We
On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:54 PM [GMT+1=CET], Russell Butler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:22 PM [GMT+1=CET], Guy Voets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
No CC anywhere, and all say Send by OOo
maybe the difference is 2x the same answer to
18 matches
Mail list logo
