[users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-04-29 Thread NoOp
On 03/14/2010 08:05 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: ... I rewrote this table for the public document. But to discard the buggy table would be to miss a chance to debug OOo. The FHS document is a permanent source of bugs, as the doctor uses 4 different computers and a cell phone to write it,

Re: [users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-04-29 Thread Franz Wein
Hi I opened the link in the Issue 110135: Created an attachment (id=68348) http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/68348/TableVI-3.odt with the OOO 3.20 OOO320m12 (Build :9482) in SeaMonkey without a problem, the table is completely correct. I use windows XP SP3 with all

[users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-04-21 Thread NoOp
On 03/14/2010 08:05 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: ... I rewrote this table for the public document. But to discard the buggy table would be to miss a chance to debug OOo. The FHS document is a permanent source of bugs, as the doctor uses 4 different computers and a cell phone to write it,

Re: [users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-14 Thread Pedro Izecksohn
--- NoOp wrote: Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: I do not understand well if the table in the original text document has been copied from Calc or not. In fact there is already a bug report for tables copied from Calc to Writer. Please have a look at issue 108978 :

[users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-13 Thread NoOp
On 03/12/2010 09:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 11.03.2010 18:56, NoOp a écrit : ... Confirmed. I just tried in go-oo/Ubuntu 3.2.0 (OOO320m11 Build:9479) and the table isn't preserved there either. So it appears to be a regression from 3.1.1. I'll load up a standard OOo 3.1.x and test in

Re: [users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 11.03.2010 18:56, NoOp a écrit : On 03/10/2010 09:38 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: I wrote: Today the doctor told me that it is possible that he produced the table in Excel. --- NoOp wrote: Still looks to be a bug. I even tried a copy paste to a new document with the

[users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-11 Thread NoOp
On 03/10/2010 09:38 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: I wrote: Today the doctor told me that it is possible that he produced the table in Excel. --- NoOp wrote: Still looks to be a bug. I even tried a copy paste to a new document with the same results. As mentioned, OOo 3.1.1

Re: [users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-10 Thread Pedro Izecksohn
I wrote:   Today the doctor told me that it is possible that he produced the table in Excel. --- NoOp wrote: Still looks to be a bug. I even tried a copy paste to a new document with the same results. As mentioned, OOo 3.1.1 Ubuntu/Novell/go-oo version preserves the table (albeit with

[users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-09 Thread NoOp
On 03/09/2010 01:28 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: --- I wrote: --- Franz Wein wrote: I don't believe that this is a table, that was produced with WRITER. The doctor that produced this table produces the statistics using Calc, but the original document was imported from Microsoft Word some

[users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-08 Thread NoOp
On 03/08/2010 12:25 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: The file referenced below if saved as .doc (97/2000/XP) does not generate the table it contains: http://www.izecksohn.com/pedro/ooobug/TableVI-3.odt Looks like a bug. When I test in 3.2.0 (linux) it does not preserve the table. When I test in

Re: [users] Re: odt table bug?

2010-03-08 Thread Daniel Lewis
NoOp wrote: On 03/08/2010 12:25 PM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: The file referenced below if saved as .doc (97/2000/XP) does not generate the table it contains: http://www.izecksohn.com/pedro/ooobug/TableVI-3.odt Looks like a bug. When I test in 3.2.0 (linux) it does not preserve the