Demand all you want, but, I think that the only posts that are moderated
are from people that are not subscribed. The end result is that most
messages are posted rather quickly to the list, as opposed to the longer
wait for those that are not subscribed to the list. I suspect that in
general,
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 09:35 +1300, Paul wrote:
[snip]
OT ... Move to disc...@openoffice or get it on topic.
/paul
Users/Discuss list moderator
With deference to your position as moderator but i would say this topic
is OT for discuss as well.
--
Michael
John Boyle wrote some god bothering nonsense...
Where are the moderators when we need them? sigh
--
Pierre
Worrigee, NSW,
,-._|\
/ Oz \
\_,--._/
v
The boys dressed themselves, hid their accoutrements, and went off
grieving that there were no outlaws any more, and
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:48:58PM +1100, Pierre wrote:
John Boyle wrote some god bothering nonsense...
Where are the moderators when we need them? sigh
Excellent question. If there are any moderators on this list I would
like to know by what guideline that post was allowed thru. Surely not
more effective methods should be there to avoid such nonsense
(including even this mail as some subscribers may think off).
With Regards,
SUBRATA NATH
RobertHoltzman hol...@cox.net
01/13/2010 11:56 AM
Please respond to
users@openoffice.org
To
users@openoffice.org
cc
Subject
Re: [users] FW
On 1/11/2010 12:58 AM, Mark Traceur wrote:
From the same article:
Continuous persecution in the 1930s resulted in its near-extinction as a
public institution (it = the Russian Orthodox Church)
Yes, but it seemed that your point was that atheists exhibited warlike
tendencies towards
Please move (or delete) this to a site that is interested, keep OOo items
only
Thanks
Harold Hauge
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com wrote:
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:51 PM, James Knott wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, James Knott wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com:
To ALL who reacted negatively: First, I spent 21 years defending your right
to FREE SPEECH, BUT YOU DENY ME MINE! To all of you who are obviously
Communist/Socialist at heart,
Neither socialists nor communists are against freedom of speech. And
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
Yet another reason not to send the crap to this list then.
Regards
Johnny Rosenberg
I have had
Wade Smart wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:46 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get
angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
...
Barbara Duprey skrev:
Wade Smart wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:46 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get
angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I
2010/1/10 Gene Young n2...@cfl.rr.com:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at
me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
Yet another reason not to send the crap to this list then.
John Boyle wrote:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry
at me for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
Whether you like it or not, that is religious propaganda and there no
room for it here. Religion is a delusion at best and if you want to
believe
John Boyle wrote:
o reacted negatively: First, I spent 21 years defending your right to
FREE SPEECH, BUT YOU DENY ME MINE!
We are not denying your right to free speech. We are, however, pointing
out that such speech, as in that message, is not appropriate here.
So, please spout your
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
Whether you like it or not, that is religious propaganda and there no room
for it here.
2010/1/10 Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at
me for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
Whether you like it or not, that is religious
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me for
sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!!:o
Whether you like it or not, that is religious propaganda and
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:51 PM, James Knott wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Jan 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, James Knott wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at
me for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!!:o
Whether
[snip]
Agree with all others that this thread is way off topic and should now be
closed.
/paul
--
Jonathan Swifthttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/jonathan_swift.html
- May you live every day of your life.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious groups.
We know that's never happened.
Care to name one (just for my own education)?
--
Bob Holtzman
GPG key ID = 8D549279
If you think you're getting free
On 1/10/2010 2:01 PM, RobertHoltzman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious groups.
We know that's never happened.
Care to name one (just for my own education)?
How about the Soviets? Or
[snip]
OT ... Move to disc...@openoffice or get it on topic.
/paul
Users/Discuss list moderator
--
Marie von
Ebner-Eschenbachhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/marie_von_ebnereschenbac.html
- Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
2010/1/10 RobertHoltzman hol...@cox.net
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious
groups. We know that's never happened.
Care to name one (just for my own education)?
--
Bob Holtzman
Bob, Hal's
2010/1/10 Programmer In Training p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us:
On 1/10/2010 2:01 PM, RobertHoltzman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious
groups. We know that's never happened.
Care to name one
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/10/2010 2:01 PM, RobertHoltzman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious groups.
We know that's never happened.
Care to name one (just for my
Can we stop feeding this thread before the troll claims a win, please?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 09:42:56PM +0100, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 RobertHoltzman hol...@cox.net
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious
groups. We know that's never happened.
Care to
On Jan 10, 2010, at 3:01 PM, RobertHoltzman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:02:13PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yeah, it's a good thing atheist regimes never do purges of religious groups.
We know that's never happened.
Care to name one (just for my own education)?
Many communist
Many communist regimes. I think there was a guy named Joseph Stalin who was
particularly good at this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin#Religious_beliefs_and_policies
Doesn't look like it to me
--MarkTraceur
On Jan 11, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Mark Traceur wrote:
Many communist regimes. I think there was a guy named Joseph Stalin who was
particularly good at this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin#Religious_beliefs_and_policies
Doesn't look like it to me
From the same article:
From the same article:
Continuous persecution in the 1930s resulted in its near-extinction as a
public institution (it = the Russian Orthodox Church)
Yes, but it seemed that your point was that atheists exhibited warlike
tendencies towards religious institutions, and you used Stalin as an
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
...
John, your message is spam, irrelevant to the concerns of this list, which
deals with problems in using OOo, open source
On 1/9/2010 5:46 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
...
John, your message is spam, irrelevant to the concerns of this list, which
My name is not John and I did not send the letter to you. Why are you
berating me?
- Original Message -
From: M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: 2010-01-09 15:46
Subject: Re: [users] FW: America]
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com:
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
Yet another reason not to send the crap to this list then.
Regards
Johnny Rosenberg
Misty Day wrote:
My name is not John and I did not send the letter to you. Why are you
berating me?
Misty, you are on a mailing list. Henris post went out to everyone.
One post to many readers.
It wasnt aimed at your directly.
Wade
--
Registered Linux User: #480675
Registered Linux
2010/1/10 Wade Smart w...@wadesmart.com:
Misty Day wrote:
My name is not John and I did not send the letter to you. Why are you
berating me?
Misty, you are on a mailing list. Henris post went out to everyone.
One post to many readers.
It wasnt aimed at your directly.
In fact, it
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:46 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
...
John, your message is spam,
John Boyle wrote:
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:46 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get
angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
...
John, your
On 1/9/2010 8:17 PM, Wade Smart wrote:
snip
John, all of that being said, its still a fact that your post is
inappropriate for this location. Free speech. All for it. I totally
respect anyone who fights for it. But we arent fighting for it here. We
are 'trying' to use to the best of our
On Jan 9, 2010, at 9:08 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:46 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/1/10 John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com
To ALL: Whether you like it or not, here it is, and you can get angry at me
for sending it to you, BUT THIS I BELIEVE!!! :o
To ALL who reacted negatively: First, I spent 21 years defending your right
to FREE SPEECH, BUT YOU DENY ME MINE!
1) You defend my right to free speech? I somehow doubt that you served
in the same army that I did.
2) You are free to speak on any appropriate forum. This is not an
appropriate
42 matches
Mail list logo
