Re: [ovirt-users] Change HostedEngine Storage

Hi Guys, Got his sorted out again. Just need to checkout what we can change about the ca_subject, CN that was previously used when setting it up. If anyone has info there would be nice. Cheers, Matt 2017-06-24 0:05 GMT+02:00 Matt . : > Hi guys, > > > When you want to

[ovirt-users] Change HostedEngine Storage

Hi guys, When you want to move your hosted_engine storage you can copy stuff over but you still need to change the image which contains all config files. Is there some documentation about how to do so ? Thanks, Matt ___ Users mailing list

Re: [ovirt-users] Info on live snapshot and agent interaction

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:09 PM Michal Skrivanek < michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 4 May 2017, at 17:51, Gianluca Cecchi > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > supposing to have a Linux VM with ovirt-guest-agent installed, File system freezing is implemented using

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: > Hello Adam and Karli, > > I will remap uid and gid of NFS to 36 and try again with NFS sharing. > > But this does not make much sense, because on iSCSI this should not > happen. There are no permissions involved and

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello Adam and Karli, I will remap uid and gid of NFS to 36 and try again with NFS sharing. But this does not make much sense, because on iSCSI this should not happen. There are no permissions involved and when oVirt runs the hosted-engine setup it creates the ext3 filesystem on the iSCSI

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Den 23 juni 2017 22:47 skrev Adam Litke :On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:Den 23 juni 2017 21:08 skrev Vinícius Ferrão :Hello oVirt folks.I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good alternatives for

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello Adam, Since the NFSv3 server is running on a FreeBSD based system I don’t want to mess with permissions (that installation was only a test). So I’ve mapped all users to root and all groups to wheel: everyone has permission to do anything on any file. # cat /etc/exports /mnt/pool/ovirt

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: > > > Den 23 juni 2017 21:08 skrev Vinícius Ferrão : > > Hello oVirt folks. > > I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good > alternatives for XenServer hypervisors. I was aware of

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: > Hello Adam, > > Since the NFSv3 server is running on a FreeBSD based system I don’t want > to mess with permissions (that installation was only a test). So I’ve > mapped all users to root and all groups to wheel:

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Den 23 juni 2017 21:08 skrev Vinícius Ferrão :Hello oVirt folks.I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good alternatives for XenServer hypervisors. I was aware of KVM for a long time but I was missing a more professional and appliance feeling of the product,

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Please provide links to the files /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log and /var/log/sanlock.log on the host you are attempting to use. Does the problem happen in the same step when using NFS vs. ISCSI? How are you configuring the NFS export that you give to hosted-engine to use? On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:53

[ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello oVirt folks. I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good alternatives for XenServer hypervisors. I was aware of KVM for a long time but I was missing a more professional and appliance feeling of the product, and oVirt appears to deliver exactly what I’m looking for.

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt split brain resolution

Hi Denis, I receive permission denied as below: gluster volume heal engine split-brain latest-mtime /e1c80750-b880-495e-9609-b8bc7760d101/ha_agent Healing /e1c80750-b880-495e-9609-b8bc7760d101/ha_agent failed:Operation not permitted. Volume heal failed. When I shutdown host3 then no split

Re: [ovirt-users] Dell firmware update problem

This is a multipath issue. I’d suggest to stop multipathd service before applying Dell updates. This will not affect currently running multipath devices. On 23/06/2017, 13:32, "users-boun...@ovirt.org on behalf of Davide Ferrari" wrote:

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt split brain resolution

Hello Abi, On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Abi Askushi wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a 3 node ovirt 4.1 setup. I lost one node due to raid controller > issues. Upon restoration I have the following split brain, although the > hosts have mounted the storage domains: > >

[ovirt-users] oVirt split brain resolution

Hi All, I have a 3 node ovirt 4.1 setup. I lost one node due to raid controller issues. Upon restoration I have the following split brain, although the hosts have mounted the storage domains: gluster volume heal engine info split-brain Brick gluster0:/gluster/engine/brick

Re: [ovirt-users] SPICE keymap ?

Am 2017-06-22 um 13:23 schrieb Matthias Leopold: hi, i'm looking for a way to change the SPICE keymap for a VM. i couldn't find it. i couldn't find a way to change it in the client either (linux remote-viewer application). this is probably easy, thanks anyway... matthias

Re: [ovirt-users] is arbiter configuration needed?

Thanks a lot Kasturl On 06/23/2017 03:25 PM, knarra wrote: On 06/23/2017 03:38 PM, Erekle Magradze wrote: Hello, I am using glusterfs as the storage backend for the VM images, volumes for oVirt consist of three bricks, is it still necessary to configure the arbiter to be on the safe side?

Re: [ovirt-users] is arbiter configuration needed?

On 06/23/2017 03:38 PM, Erekle Magradze wrote: Hello, I am using glusterfs as the storage backend for the VM images, volumes for oVirt consist of three bricks, is it still necessary to configure the arbiter to be on the safe side? or since the number of bricks is odd it will be done out of

[ovirt-users] Dell firmware update problem

Hello I'm trying to update the BIOS firmware on a Dell PowerEdge with CentOS (just upgraded to 7.3) running oVirt 4.0 and it fails with an error mount: /dev/sdb is already mounted or /tmp/SECUPD busy The problem is acknoleged by Red Hat and there is a solution for it

[ovirt-users] is arbiter configuration needed?

Hello, I am using glusterfs as the storage backend for the VM images, volumes for oVirt consist of three bricks, is it still necessary to configure the arbiter to be on the safe side? or since the number of bricks is odd it will be done out of the box? Thanks in advance Cheers Erekle

Re: [ovirt-users] Hot Memory add and Physical Memory guaranteed

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > "Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto" writes: > >> i just tested the memory hot add to a vm. This vm had 2048 MB. I set >> the new memory to 2662 MB. >> I logged into the vm and i've seen that hasn't

Re: [ovirt-users] Hot Memory add and Physical Memory guaranteed

And I believe the virt team is working on "hotplug" support for the guaranteed memory so mom will start changing the balloon size accordingly. Michal: is there a bug tracking that? Regards, Martin Sivak On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > "Luca

Re: [ovirt-users] Hot Memory add and Physical Memory guaranteed

"Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto" writes: > i just tested the memory hot add to a vm. This vm had 2048 MB. I set > the new memory to 2662 MB. > I logged into the vm and i've seen that hasn't been any memory change, > even if i said to the manager to apply memory expansion

[ovirt-users] qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.10.1 now available

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1 has been tagged for release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors. This release addresses a security issue (CVE-2017-7718) which has a security impact rated important. See

[ovirt-users] GDeploy, thin provisioning and pools

Hi, I'm trying to get gdeploy working for my servers (3 of them) using the following configu linked below: https://gist.github.com/ekarlso/9bfa0e0560b84ec286ef34ab790d But it seems I need to have 1 pool metadata lv pr volume group? Regards Endre