Re: [Users] sanlock leases on VM disks

2014-01-27 Thread José Luis Sanz Boixader
On 01/17/2014 11:43 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/10/2014 08:44 PM, José Luis Sanz Boixader wrote: I have an oVirt testing setup with 3 hosts running for a few weeks: CentOS 6.4, oVirt 3.3.1, VDSM 4.13.0, iSCSI based storage domain. I have just realized that sanlock has no leases on VM disks,

Re: [Users] sanlock leases on VM disks

2014-01-27 Thread Itamar Heim
On 01/27/2014 01:06 PM, José Luis Sanz Boixader wrote: On 01/17/2014 11:43 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/10/2014 08:44 PM, José Luis Sanz Boixader wrote: I have an oVirt testing setup with 3 hosts running for a few weeks: CentOS 6.4, oVirt 3.3.1, VDSM 4.13.0, iSCSI based storage domain. I have

Re: [Users] sanlock leases on VM disks

2014-01-17 Thread Itamar Heim
On 01/10/2014 08:44 PM, José Luis Sanz Boixader wrote: I have an oVirt testing setup with 3 hosts running for a few weeks: CentOS 6.4, oVirt 3.3.1, VDSM 4.13.0, iSCSI based storage domain. I have just realized that sanlock has no leases on VM disks, so nothing prevents vdsm/libvirt from

[Users] sanlock leases on VM disks

2014-01-10 Thread José Luis Sanz Boixader
I have an oVirt testing setup with 3 hosts running for a few weeks: CentOS 6.4, oVirt 3.3.1, VDSM 4.13.0, iSCSI based storage domain. I have just realized that sanlock has no leases on VM disks, so nothing prevents vdsm/libvirt from starting a VM on two different hosts, corrupting disk data. I