There were 7 binding +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has passed.
I will add the files to the dist release repo and create the final tag
shortly, updating the website once the release has synced to the CDN.
Robbie
Great, thanks Roddie.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 08:49, Roddie Kieley wrote:
>
> With it not being a regression and a jira to look into it further I think I'm
> +1 for this release in that case.
>
> On 2022/03/21 07:56:10 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff.
> >
> >
With it not being a regression and a jira to look into it further I think I'm
+1 for this release in that case.
On 2022/03/21 07:56:10 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff.
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 05:46, Cliff Jansen wrote:
> >
> > I can reproduce the problem
Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 05:46, Cliff Jansen wrote:
>
> I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35.
>
> It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression.
>
> If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py
I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35.
It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression.
If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py driver program, the failure
goes away. In my opinion, this is a flaky test that Python 3.10 triggers
more
I haven't, I'm using 3.9.
I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with
0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed.
Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't
personally had it fail locally.
Unless someone with more of a clue
+1
I compiled and tested the 0.37.0-rc2 git tag:
Both with C++ and Python bindings.
* FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE x86_64 (clang 11.0.1)
* Successfully Built RelWithDebInfo and tested with valgrind
with no failures.
* Successfully Build RelWithDebInfo with ASAN, but testing
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:40 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
I checked signature and
Similar, but not complaining about Too many open files in the last part,
instead it's complaining about subprocesses that are still running
[rkieley@z820 4]$ ctest -VV -R c-fdlimit-tests --repeat-until-fail 10
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:35 AM Jiri Daněk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:20 AM Roddie Kieley wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> > python 3.6+ as per:
> >
> > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> >
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:20 AM Roddie Kieley wrote:
> Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> python 3.6+ as per:
>
> -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
>
Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify python
3.6+ as per:
-- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0", minimum
required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development Development.Module
Development.Embed
but on Fedora 34 with
+1
Built and tested with new TLS library.
Did basic soak test with Quiver and Qpid Dispatch 1.19 RC2: high message
throughput alternating with 250 simultaneous connections.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:34 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid
+1
Built, ctest, validated - all good.
Ran dispatch-router + broker stress test - worked!
Dispatch and Skupper-router in repo CI tests - yes!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:05 AM Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 3/15/22 13:33, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have put together another spin
On 3/15/22 13:33, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The files can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
The JIRAs assigned are:
+1
I checked things out as follows:
- Verified the signature + checksum files.
- Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files present in the archive.
- Ran the build + tests and installed.
- Built Qpid Dispatch 1.19.x against it and ran the tests.
- Ran Qpid JMS 1.5.0 HelloWorld example against the built
Hi folks,
I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The files can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
The JIRAs assigned are:
The vote is cancelled due to the issues confirmed and still awaiting
further investigation. I will cut a new candidate for voting when
appropriate.
Robbie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For
Still waiting for the other issue, but it does seem likely its a bug
in the updated codec bits from the detail available and would be a
regression...so coupled with the python issue, I've decided it makes
sense just to cancel the vote for now and get those fixes.
Robbie
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at
This one it seems isnt a regression, though has been described as
'potentially nasty', noted. Still waiting on more details around the
other thing which would be a regression. Will leave the vote open
further still and decide when that one is clear.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 10:23, Jiri Daněk wrote:
+- "?"
A GitHub PR has been opened, which suggests there might be a refcounting
issue in the Python binding. https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/360.
Looking at the history of the relevant code, it looks to me that the PR is
trying to fix reference counting in code last updated in
Will be leaving it open longer while a potential regression, possibly
related to something else seen and fixed just before the vote, is also
looked into.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 13:27, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> If it isnt a regression and not considered a blocker then the release
> will currently
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:34 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> If it isnt a regression and not considered a blocker then the release
> will currently be continuing. It presently has the votes needed and
> has been open long enough already to proceed, but I'll leave it open a
> little bit longer yet in
If it isnt a regression and not considered a blocker then the release
will currently be continuing. It presently has the votes needed and
has been open long enough already to proceed, but I'll leave it open a
little bit longer yet in hope of some more responses.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 19:26,
This is interesting and may indicate an issue specific to Fedora (or
the versions of dependent libraries on Fedora) as the Travis CI runs an
ASAN job on Ubuntu 20.04 with the clang compiler which does not see any
failure. It also runs a TSAN job but there the python tests are
disabled for some
+1
Built and ran tests, including the new TLS library and associated example.
Ran some quiver soak tests against the Dispatch router, including 1, 3, and
125 arrow pairs.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:17 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton
I can reproduce. I also get failures for Proton 0.36 on the same system.
In my opinion it is not a regression and not a reason to fail this RC.
I will raise a Jira to get this resolved for the next release.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:29 AM Ken Giusti wrote:
> +- "?"
>
> Just want to rule
+- "?"
Just want to rule out any error that may be creeping in between my grey
matter and my keyboard, but I'm hitting errors running the
python-integration-tests.
Anyone else getting these?
$ cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/kgiusti
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DRUNTIME_CHECK=asan
On 2/24/22 08:17, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The files can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc1/
The JIRAs assigned are:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 13:17, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc1/
>
> The
Hi folks,
I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The files can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc1/
The JIRAs assigned are:
31 matches
Mail list logo
