RE: Resource class vs CND

2015-11-16 Thread Olaf
Hi Guillaume, That does sound like use cases well suitable for Sling. I would indeed not opt for custom node types (yet), as simply using sling:resourceType is flexible and allows quickly changing the content structure. Indeed, authentication should not be an issue as well. Even it here was no

RE: Resource class vs CND

2015-11-16 Thread Jason Bailey
After spending 6 months working with AEM and MongoDB. I would be hesitant to recommend it as a solution. -Original Message- From: Olaf [mailto:o...@x100.de] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 10:49 AM To: users@sling.apache.org Subject: RE: Resource class vs CND Hi Guillaume, That does

RE: Resource class vs CND

2015-11-16 Thread Olaf
Hi Jason, That sounds interesting! Would you mind providing a bit more detail as to why you would advise against it? Regards, Olaf -Original Message- From: Jason Bailey [mailto:jason.bai...@sas.com] Sent: Montag, 16. November 2015 17:04 To: users@sling.apache.org Subject: RE: Resource

Re: Resource class vs CND

2015-11-16 Thread Guillaume Lucazeau
Thank you Olaf for your answer. I have currently little information about the app. What I know is that it will mostly manage documents, organized like this: - network (a dozen) -- documents: around 1,500 --- pages: around 15,000 (total) components (graphs, map, picture etc.): 1 to 4 per