+1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie.
Thanks!
El Miércoles, 20 de mayo, 2015 20:02:21, Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca escribió:
On 20/05/2015 20:22, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Not yet a stable build?
Because SOGo v2.3.0 is not released.
Why?
Because there's virtually *no*
When there's less than 4 Gigabytes of RAM, the empirical evidence I have is
that an x86 distributtion offers a better performance than an amd64 one. For
deployments of light load or simple exploration environments, it could be
convenient also, taking advantage of existing hardware available
SOHO: using my hardware as long as it does what i want it to do like i
want it to do. and small groups don't need big hardware.
Thanx to all of you for your great work!
J. Feldner
__
Am 21.05.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Tanstaafl:
On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J.
On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J. rodolfo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
+1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie.
Why on earth would anyone intentionally run an i386 version of anything
on a server today???
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Am 21.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Zhang Huangbin:
On May 21, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I see no problem with vendors with limited resources refusing to support
ancient/antiquated environments (unless it can be scripted and done with
little to no effort)...
On 21/05/2015 15:38, André Schild wrote:
- You have to make the scripts
Checked.
- The builds can break for whatever reason
s/can/always/
- There might be 32/64Bit issues which need tracking,debugging,fixing
s/might be/are always/
Ludo
--
Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca ::
On May 21, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I see no problem with vendors with limited resources refusing to support
ancient/antiquated environments (unless it can be scripted and done with
little to no effort)...
Just curious, does SOGo team build packages
On 5/21/2015 10:41 AM, Zhang Huangbin z...@iredmail.org wrote:
On May 21, 2015, at 10:13 PM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J.
rodolfo...@yahoo.com wrote:
As far as I know the naming of the Debian port depends on the
underlying microprocessor architecture. In https://www.debian.org/ports/
the
hi,
i've created an inssue in bugzilla
http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3218
hope the packages will be released soon
fous
2015-04-27 19:58 GMT+02:00 Dominik Breu dominik.b...@hbs-buko.info:
Hello,
i ask this question far back in mid march no awnser till today. But i
ran Sogo on my
On 20/05/2015 07:12, Jan Krcmar wrote:
i've created an inssue in bugzilla
http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3218
hope the packages will be released soon
Jessie builds are now available for x86_64:
http://inverse.ca/debian-nightly/pool/jessie/
We do NOT plan to release i386 builds for
Hi,
now that Debian Jessie is considered stable, are there any plans on
releasing Jessie packages with the next release?
Is anyone running the SOGo packages included in Debian (1.3.16 in
Wheezy, 2.2.9 in Jessie)? My major concern is if there are safe upgrade
paths for such version jumps.
If yes,
11 matches
Mail list logo
