Hi!
My question was: Where to listen for the announcements?
Here on this list? Some other channel?
I've been getting RDJ updates via cron once a week for a while now. I don't
see how that can be construed as abusive, but I'm game to unhook it while
they figure out what to do. I'm not wanting
Hello,
We realy need some help here. It has come to our attention that our
bayes database is 2.4 GB big. It is really slowing down our servers and
they have a big cpu load.
Now we have tried the trick with the sa-learn --force-expire , and it
deletes a lot of entrys, but the file is not
Hi,
Same problem here with a 1.3G bayes_seen file.
No CPU load linked to this but a too big file is never good...
Can someone help to deal with this ? As long as I remember this problem were
discussed a lot of time here but I never saw a trick for this
-Message d'origine-
De :
bayes_seen just grows like topsy. All you need to do is delete it and
let SA recreate it.
Stop spamd / MailScanner / whatever.
check permissions on bayes_seen
rm bayes_seen
restart
do an sa-learn to make sure it still works (if it doesn't, reset
permissions on the newly created bayes_seen).
Hi Phil,
Thanks for this tip but what about the efficiency of the Bayes Database
after this operation ?
I was thinking that the most this file can remember, the most the bayes
filtering is efficient... In the limit of a reasonable file size of course !
As Richard said, with the sa-learn
Hi All
I have to make something after sa-update ?
like copy files to anywhere ?
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
hi
We are using MS Exchange 2003 server on windows 2003 server. We have
registered with domain service and using 50 mail users. We are getting lot
of spam mails. I want to know the configuring details of
Mail-spamassassin-3.1.7 and how to control the spam mails..
--
View this message in
Luis,
I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from source here,
most of the other relevant info is in the header of the mail I sent
before to test). Where did you get them?
[...]
But the main difference between the live run and the ones I did with
SA by itself (both as root and as
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote:
I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from
source on Redhat ES4 and running make test.
I'm wondering if this is the reason:
+ make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test
/usr/bin/perl5.8.7 build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src
Daniel J McDonald writes:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote:
I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from
source on Redhat ES4 and running make test.
I'm wondering if this is the reason:
+ make FULLPERL=/usr/bin/perl test
/usr/bin/perl5.8.7
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:29 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote:
I'm seeing the same kind of
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:45 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote:
I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from
source on Redhat ES4 and running make test.
I'm wondering if this is the reason:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:45 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 21:09 -0400, Rose, Bobby wrote:
I'm seeing the same kind of messages mentioned after compiling from
source on Redhat ES4 and running make test.
I'm
On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
So, you can't build the RPM as root.
I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user build
directory tree, compiled it under my username and it tested fine, at least
to the point
that it normally
Richard Smits wrote:
Hello,
We realy need some help here. It has come to our attention that our
bayes database is 2.4 GB big. It is really slowing down our servers
and they have a big cpu load.
Now we have tried the trick with the sa-learn --force-expire , and it
deletes a lot of entrys,
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 02:17 -0700, Emre BALCI wrote:
Hi All
I have to make something after sa-update ?
only if you used sa-compile, then you would have to run sa-compile
again.
like copy files to anywhere ?
Nope. sa-update puts them in the correct place.
If you are using a daemonized
Emre BALCI wrote:
Hi All
I have to make something after sa-update ?
like copy files to anywhere ?
If you use spamd, it needs to be restarted, but you don't need to copy
the files.
sg wrote:
hi
We are using MS Exchange 2003 server on windows 2003 server. We have
registered with domain service and using 50 mail users. We are getting lot
of spam mails. I want to know the configuring details of
Mail-spamassassin-3.1.7 and how to control the spam mails..
I'd offer to
i would also agree with Matt, to add a dedicated server running SpamAssassin
and tunnel all incoming mail through it,
OR: we're are using a proxy-Server: NoSpamProxy (NSP)
(http://www.nospamproxy.com/) to check all incoming and outgoing mails.
Incoming mails are also send to a dedicated
I am seeing this error. Any Idea how to fix this?
Freebsd 6.2
SpamAssassin-3.2.0
spamd[46771]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/usr/local/share/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: No buffer space
available
Thanks.
--
With best regards,
Mike Fahey - Systems Administration
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm that
there are no popular DUL lists showing 74.254.46.133 as
Well, I dint't have rbl_timeout set, but after your mail, I did. The
DNSs I have set in resolv.conf are mine, they both cache and work as
internal and external resolvers. But the UNLP NOC got screwed in the
last days, so setting the timeout a little higher wont't hurt. Thanks
for the suggestion.
Dan Barker schrieb:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm that
there are no popular DUL lists showing
What O/S ? What kernel release ? Have you tuned any system parameters for
TCP buffers ? Is there high traffic on the server ? Somebody isn't trying
to DDoS your server are they ?
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:40 -0400, Mike Fahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing this error. Any Idea how to fix
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:07:15AM +0200, Stéphane LEPREVOST wrote:
Thanks for this tip but what about the efficiency of the Bayes Database
after this operation ?
The _seen database just tracks which mails have been learned from, and has no
effect on the ratings coming out of the Bayes system.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:45:25AM +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
If you want to use SARE rules, just take it easy with the frequency you
are getting the files with.
Or use sa-update instead of RDJ. :)
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Advice is a dangerous commodity.
pgp7JBmuFyEWS.pgp
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:25:32PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
The Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf is silent on this issue. Is there a way to
do this?
Set the scores for all rules querying the RBLs you want to disable to 0.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
He was like Tigger on 'ludes. - Carol Herre
Dan Barker schrieb:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm
that there are no popular DUL
Dan Barker schrieb:
Dan Barker follows up:
I think you confirmed that my delegated rDNS is proper and that the 421
message is in error. But I'm not certain. Can you please confirm your
assessment? My ISP provides me a /26 subnet out of the 74.254.46.0 class C,
so the rDNS delegation is done with
susan barnes wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Susan Barnes wrote:
The site rules should be in /etc/mail/spamassassin/
with a file updates_spamassassin_org.cf including the sets in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/updates_spamassassin_org
Also, updates don't live there, at least by default.
Hi there,
I get the following error when trying to use sa-learn.
SA Learn: Use of uninitialized value in hash element at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Metadata/Received.pm line 357.,
Use of uninitialized value in hash element at
At 07:42 12-06-2007, Dan Barker wrote:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
That IP address is not dynamic. The reverse DNS is correct.
Does anybody recognize the
Luis,
Namely with 22 RBL results coming back, the last one
(which was the crucial URIBL test) had a timeout of 0
and was ignored even though dns result did arrive.
Moreover, there is a bug in Mail::SpamAssassin::Dns, where
a late-spawned URIBL queries (which only start after Razor,
Hallo all,
is there a way to higher score the email sent to non-existent local
recipient (detected via ldap)
and
even so collect them to honex pot, smamaccount for re-feed the bayes.
especially if the sender is the same ..
thanks for ideas...
cheers
Marco
--
View this message in context:
* mbano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo all,
is there a way to higher score the email sent to non-existent local
recipient (detected via ldap)
and
even so collect them to honex pot, smamaccount for re-feed the bayes.
especially if the sender is the same ..
Depends on your MTA, with postfix
Dan Barker wrote:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
In case there's any doubt about whether or not the Botnet plugin tripped
up on the PTR record situation (and
Just wondering how long it's going to take to get SA 3.2.1 into CPAN?
Thanks for yet _more_ confirmation. However, if botnet is depending on DNS
pulling the right stuff, and someone's DNS is pulling the wrong stuff,
then it still could be botnet; just not directly.
Definitions:
right: follow the CNAME to get a PTR
wrong: return the CNAME as an answer.
I'm trying
Dan Barker schrieb:
Definitions:
right: follow the CNAME to get a PTR
wrong: return the CNAME as an answer.
Yes thats what I meant, the script on the other side seems to be to
stupid to realise that the first lookup isnt the final answer, in this
wrong answer it finds the own ip and
Marc Perkel writes:
Just wondering how long it's going to take to get SA 3.2.1 into CPAN?
oops. forgot to upload it. ;)
--j.
Hi all
I just upgraded to 3.2
Now every message is timing out-
If anyone has any ideas can you CC me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As no messages are coming in THANKS
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY
Sorry all
I just panicked -
I didn't know that upgrading would replace my startup script - So I just
added the arguments back into the startup script.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:41 PM
To:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I didn't know that upgrading would replace my startup script - So I just
added the arguments back into the startup script.
Most distro packages include a place for you to put startup options that
override the default ones, and don't get overwritten on upgrades. This
Hello,
After upgrading SA from 3.0 to 3.1, I get the attached logs when I restart
spamd.
This seems to be a configuration error. In fact, the local.cf file has been
wrote for the 3.0 version.
Can someone help me with it ?
Thanks.
--
Emmanuel Lesouef
DSI | CRBN
t : 0231069671
m : [EMAIL
Sorry all
I just panicked -
I didn't know that upgrading would replace my startup script - So I just
added the arguments back into the startup script.
-Original Message-
Now that I added the arguments back to my startup script for SA my CPU usage
is getting nailed
43
From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
So, you can't build the RPM as root.
I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user
build
directory tree, compiled it under my username and it
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:07 -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
So, you can't build the RPM as root.
Very interesting, but I ran into this problem on a Solaris
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 6/12/2007 3:53 AM -0800:
Luis,
I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from source here,
most of the other relevant info is in the header of the mail I sent
before to test). Where did you get them?
[...]
But the main difference between the live
Well caught, Mark!
I'd come to similar conclusions even without digging into the code when
I saw DNS-related strangeness when I was testing SA 3.2.0 a few weeks
back.
I'll second your request that SA process all results it has collected on
timeout, instead of discarding them.
Cheers,
Phil
Bill,
Mark, just curious if you are running Botnet? I found that some
messages cause the Botnet RDNS test to timeout after hanging for about
30 seconds, and then network test randomly fail (primarily URIBL
tests). I found that if I disable Botnet, then all network tests will
run fine on
Bill,
I was getting this sort of symptom without using Botnet.
It's almost as if something's deadlocking somewhere in SA (until the
timeout kicks in).
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2007 22:47
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
At 11:04 AM 6/12/2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Marc Perkel writes:
Just wondering how long it's going to take to get SA 3.2.1 into CPAN?
oops. forgot to upload it. ;)
--j.
This it? We going back in versions?
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 6/12/2007 3:05 PM -0800:
Bill,
Mark, just curious if you are running Botnet? I found that some
messages cause the Botnet RDNS test to timeout after hanging for about
30 seconds, and then network test randomly fail (primarily URIBL
tests). I found that
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Jerry Durand wrote:
This it? We going back in versions?
Spam detector and markup engine
Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.9
Nope. Bugfix release for 3.1.x series.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174
Hi,
for a while i've been watching my spamassassin perform great on almost
all spam - i've never had any false positives and also a very low count
of false negatives.
So I thought about rejecting sure spam during the SMTP session and came
up with a few bits of shellscript code thats rejecting
Bill,
Mark, I patched Dns.pm but this didn't resolve the issue for me.
You can test with the sample messages I posted to bugzilla:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5506
Yes, it is the same problem as I describe in
That wouldn't be TCP buffers. It's doing file I/O not network I/O.
Since it's file buffers, which on nearly every OS are dynamic, it
implies Mike's machine is out-of-memory.
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
What O/S ? What kernel release ? Have you tuned any system parameters for
TCP buffers ? Is there
arni wrote:
Hi,
for a while i've been watching my spamassassin perform great on almost
all spam - i've never had any false positives and also a very low count
of false negatives.
So I thought about rejecting sure spam during the SMTP session and came
up with a few bits of shellscript code
Before I put my foot in my mouth to my ISP, I'd like to make sure I'm right.
From the headers below, what does Embarq/Synacor consider to be ALL_TRUSTED?
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.embarq.synacor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECA115F5EC
If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3.2.1 portfile, you
can download it here:
http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa321.tgz
Instructions: rm everything in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin,
untar above there, make or portupgrade it.
Some dependencies that have not been committed to
I've installed spamassassin 3.1.8 as distributed with opensuse linux
10.2. Following the installation, I used sa-update to download what I
thought were the latest updates available in the default
updates.spamassassin.org channel. These were downloaded to
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008. The
Hi arni,
once you are reading the .qmail file, the mail message has been accepted and
queued.
You can use qmail-scanner (which runs before queuing the message) to reject
Wolfgang Hamann
Hi,
for a while i've been watching my spamassassin perform great on almost
all spam - i've never
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:44:43PM +1000, Hans Holt wrote:
I've been running sa-update daily ever since, sa-update claims that no
newer updates are available. The version sa-update downloaded the
There haven't been 3.1 updates in a while, fwiw.
first time was 507739 but on
Hi,
I been using a script to pull updates from SARE, but it
seem to be stuck every night for a night now I am see wget process stuck
on www.rulesemporium.com.
Are they just down? Or gone for the
count?
www.britishscifiexchange.com
All,
I have several remote users in a country well known to inject spam mail.
These users are connected via dialup links to our backend Exchange
Server and they are able to send email. The Exchange Server relays all
email to the front end mail server running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4
and
65 matches
Mail list logo
