On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
I'm not repeating for the 5th time that there are no trusted
mailservers. Only this host.
That's a contradiction, because this host is a mailserver.
Clearly you have a trusted mailserver.
However, in the interest of moving the discussion
Dear spamassassin users,
we are using spamassassin on a site-wide basis. It is invoked via a
script from postfix and is simply called by spamassassin -e -x.
Suprisingly, when executing it by a user named filter and executing it
by root, different tests are executed (See below). Why could
Hello Guys,
im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
application.
Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
because of RBL checks, for example:
Content analysis details: (8.4 points, 8.0 required)
pts rule name
On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:32 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Guys,
im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
application.
Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
because of RBL checks, for example:
On 02.05.08 17:13, Matt wrote:
When already running Spamassassin with Razor how much would adding
Pyzor and DCC to the mix help?
DCC adds much. Pyzor helps a bit too, however is not so effective. I
recommend turning on both
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Nigel Frankcom escreveu:
On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:32 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Guys,
im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
application.
Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
On Sun, May 4, 2008 01:55, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
I think you got it wrong this 201.11.150.2 is my customer,
which really is in a DSL dynamic ip address line. This is NOT my mail
server. My mail server is on a static ip address which has no problem at
all with RBLs.
does
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
I'm not repeating for the 5th time that there are no trusted
mailservers. Only this host.
That's a contradiction, because this host is a mailserver. Clearly
you have a trusted mailserver.
However, in the interest of moving the
Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rob McEwen wrote:
(on-list follow-up)
By proactive listings, I discovered in my off-list conversation with
Dallas that this refers to URIBL-Gold listings... where items are
listed in uribl-gold in advance of seeing them in actual spams. But
this uribl-gold list isn't
