I've noticed just today that PHP has not been sending any mail at all
anymore if spamassassin is enabled. (I'm running it on Ubuntu Hardy,
through citadel, but everything is working fine there). I had a look
at /var/log/mail.log and it appears to be blocking the emails, marking
them as spam.
Is
On Friday 13 June 2008 12:00:18 Rob van der Linde wrote:
I know that mail sent from localhost is ok, because I created the PHP
scripts myself.
Well... no. If SA says they're not ok, then they're not ok.
You can fix your MTA to not pass outgoing mails to SA,
but neither can you fix SA, nor
On Friday 13 June 2008 12:39:39 you wrote:
can't you tell spamassassin to only check incoming mails, not outgoing
mails?
SA doesnt have outgoing and incomming. thats your MTA.
Besides SA does already HAVE a rule for mails sent from yourself.
ALL_TRUSTED should trigger on those mails.
That
On 12.06.08 23:15, nitin joshi wrote:
I am using spamassassin as a spam filtering tool with
sendmail. Spamassassin is filtering at MDA level with procmail. No other
filtering or scaning tool attached with sendmail or at any other level.
maybe the header come from sender or
On 12.06.08 18:51, Matthias Leisi wrote:
On the company mailserver, we take a very conservative approach, and
only Spamhaus SBL+XBL are used at the MTA level.
you should switch to ZEN in such case, SBL+XBL is obsolete now.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
On 12.06.08 10:25, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You may put other servers, not under your control, to trusted_networks,
if you trust them not to originate spam.
^
Matus, I believe that assertion is
On Thursday 12 June 2008 2:16 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
you should put at least your MX backups into trusted_networks AND
internal_networks, if there are any. You may put other servers, not under
your control, to trusted_networks, if you trust them not to originate spam.
For what it's worth, this appears to be happening on _every_ message
that comes through. In other words, no spam at all is getting tagged,
and we're running on RBLs, etc., alone. So I'd appreciate any and all
suggestions. :)
Thanks.
Chris St. Pierre
Unix Systems Administrator
Nebraska
On 12.06.08 16:22, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
About a year ago, I started this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200708.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
I kind of forgot about the issue, but it's cropping up again; we're
now on 3.2.4, and still having the problem.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
How do you use spamassassin, from procmail/maildrop? milter?
I call it from Postfix thusly:
--
main.cf:
--
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/spamassassin
--
I thought so, too. But
---8---
; DiG 9.3.4 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org ANY
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 8343
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 5
;; QUESTION SECTION:
I suspect Net::DNS cannot parse nameserver localhost. Try
nameserver 127.0.0.1
instead,
--j.
Vinogratzky writes:
I thought so, too. But
---8---
; DiG 9.3.4 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org ANY
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR,
I was told by Kintera, our email service, to email this address regarding a
problem I'm having with my spam score report. A report is generated with each
test email we send to ourselves via Kintera. The report lists things that may
trigger high spam scores. I was given the report below for an
I was told by Kintera, our email service, to email this address
regarding a problem I'm having with my spam score report. A report is
generated with each test email we send to ourselves via Kintera. The
report lists things that may trigger high spam scores. I was given the
report below
On 12.06.08 13:45, Amy Marcott wrote:
I was told by Kintera, our email service, to email this address regarding a
problem I'm having with my spam score report. A report is generated with each
test email we send to ourselves via Kintera. The report lists things that may
trigger high spam
In v310.pre, we had this:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
...amongst many other loadplugin lines. Through trial-and-error, I've
determined that commenting out the Pyzor line (along with the pyzor
config lines in local.cf) solves the problem.
Unfortunately, I really _liked_ Pyzor,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb:
On 12.06.08 18:51, Matthias Leisi wrote:
On the company mailserver, we take a very conservative approach, and
only Spamhaus SBL+XBL are used at the MTA level.
you should switch to ZEN in such case, SBL+XBL is obsolete now.
We use a local feed, so querying
Hmm, I'm on DSL, so, should I place my IP in trusted_networks?
No. Your IP address does not relay mail to you.
For
instance, I did have this trusted_networks 192.168/16 71.48.160.0/20,
however, looking at the received line of the post I initally made, my IP is
now 71.51.96.186.
Hi Amy,
At 10:45 12-06-2008, Amy Marcott wrote:
I was told by Kintera, our email service, to email this address
regarding a problem I'm having with my spam score report. A report
Usually, it's up to your email service provider to deal with such questions.
I put SA on my server and have had it running for a while now (couple
months). I have been training it with ham and spam this whold time time and
am probably up to a couple hundred messages of ham and a couple thousand
messages of spam.
What I am seeing is a TON of email that is obvious spam
You've presented good logic for acceping mail from self to self.
But you haven't explained by using the AWL for mail from self to
self is better than not having it.
On Jun 2, 2008, at 4:02 AM, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Because it can help discriminate between spam and ham addressed from
self
On 12-Jun-08, at 9:41 PM, mouss wrote:
if it really came from them, it's probably an isolated/unsupported
initiative from a marketer gone crazy.
report the problem to their abuse team (or anyone in their tech
team). In all companies I worked for, I've seen few guys coming up
with bad good
On Friday 13 June 2008 11:56 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Should I put the IP for mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com on the
trusted_networks line? That comes out to be 208.47.184.3. I also had this
as internal_networks internal_networks 71.48.160.0/20, is that correct?
Yes, if that
Thank you, now my trusted_networks line looks like this:
trusted_networks 192.168/16 208.47.184.3 208.47.184.2
Is that correct? Do I need the 192.168/16 entry?
I don't have it, my 10/8 lan network.. in my trusted.
I think your can throw it away.
On Friday 13 June 2008 7:09 pm, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Thank you, now my trusted_networks line looks like this:
trusted_networks 192.168/16 208.47.184.3 208.47.184.2
Is that correct? Do I need the 192.168/16 entry?
I don't have it, my 10/8 lan network.. in my trusted.
I think your can
I sent a post with the above subject about a week and a half ago and Justin
Mason stated that its apparently a Razor problem. I sent the same post to the
Razor list and received 'no' replies. I don't doubt Justin at all, however,
with no replies from the Razor list I'm turning back to the SA
One item of interest that I forgot. The below is from a message I posted to
the Razor list back on the 4th of June:
I have the razor plug-in enabled and razor-admin -v reports the version to be:
Razor Agents 2.84, protocol version 3
If I go and disable the razor plug-in and stop and start
archaic0 wrote:
I put SA on my server and have had it running for a while now (couple
months). I have been training it with ham and spam this whold time time and
am probably up to a couple hundred messages of ham and a couple thousand
messages of spam.
What I am seeing is a TON of email that
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You may put other servers, not under your control, to
trusted_networks, if you trust them not to originate spam.
^
Matus, I believe that assertion is incorrect...
Actually, that's
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
Hi,
just 10 minutes ago i received a false positive. First i was confused then i
figured that my SA setup didn't actually flag it, but the senders SA.
So, how could i tell SA to remove any X-Spam flags in case the mail has been
identified as non spam?
I just setup a server 2 days ago and had one active domain running in it.
I still get tons of spams, the hit rate was well below 10%. Out of every 10
spams, less than 1 was tagged in average.
My score to tag is 5, 8 to delete
Now I focus my customizations on plugins which I hope can
31 matches
Mail list logo
