can you change it to list reverse, so freemail domains is all other then
what is not freemail domain ?
this is imho more simple to knwo where to pay for email then to know with
domains is free :-)
this olso save us work to add new spamming and free email domains all time
else i can just say
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:01:32AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
can you change it to list reverse, so freemail domains is all other then
what is not freemail domain ?
this is imho more simple to knwo where to pay for email then to know with
domains is free :-)
I'm not sure if I follow
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:18:11AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:01:32AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
can you change it to list reverse, so freemail domains is all other then
what is not freemail domain ?
this is imho more simple to knwo where to pay for email then
On Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 ram wrote:
Since Last week spams are at 50% of what
they used to be last month. Is this what you all are seeing
We've had a high at beginnin of June, and now we're very low in spam
volume. Maybe they prepare a new burst for the holidays? Or they know
spamming in
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fredag, 20/6 2008, 10:04, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:12:45AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
That is correct, SPF checks are applied to the first untrusted host.
Matt, you should know better. ;) It's first _external_ host.
and is
Hello,
I have installed DCC and I think it should be working:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ spamassassin -D junk 21 | grep -i DCC
[7227] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_dcc.cf
[7227] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC from @INC
[7227] dbg: dcc: network tests on,
On 26.06.08 13:35, Florian Lindner wrote:
I have installed DCC and I think it should be working:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ spamassassin -D junk 21 | grep -i DCC
[7227] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_dcc.cf
[7227] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC from @INC
Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I have installed DCC and I think it should be working:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ spamassassin -D junk 21 | grep -i DCC
[7227] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_dcc.cf
[7227] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC from @INC
[7227] dbg: dcc:
That option wasn't removed from SA.. it was removed from the main conf
docs, as all of the AWL is now a plugin. That option is documented in the
docs for the AWL plugin, which is where it really belongs. (if the option
isn't valid without the plugin, then it in theory shouldn't be in the main
Hi all,
Is there a way to disable Spam Assassin for just one virtual domain?
Im on a centos 4.x box
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/diasble-for-virtual-domain-tp18134873p18134873.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 07:13 -0700, raulbe wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to disable Spam Assassin for just one virtual domain?
Im on a centos 4.x box
Yes.
Oh, your real question was how do I Well, that depends on how you
have integrated spamassassin. I use amavisd-new, so for me it is
Hi
In my local.cf I have
--
score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100
priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800
shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on
shortcircuit RCVD_IN_XBL spam
--
So I expect RCVD_IN_XBL to be evaluated after USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST ,
but
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam
using SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
required_score is set to high value of 9 to avoid false postives. Mail
which is detected as spam is being deleted.
All SA filtering is
Hi to all,
I have just set up a new server with postfix and spamassassin.
Spamassassin works fine but when I look at my mail.log I can see lots of
errors.
For every mail spamassassin scans, I get the message:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:02:18AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, June 25, 2008 23:39, Bob Proulx wrote:
By what method did you recieve that URL?
dsn bounce
Could you send the whole DSN, please?
My guess is someone's mail setup on this list is re-routing mails by Header
To: and
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam using SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
required_score is set to high value of 9 to avoid false postives. Mail which
is detected as spam
Thanks for everyone's tips.. Stupid question: what is the difference
between whitelist_auth and def_whitelist_auth?
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, June 23, 2008 08:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] bsaa42453.tk.mesh.ad.jp
On Thu, June 26, 2008 16:24, McDonald, Dan wrote:
I use amavisd-new, so for me it is as
simple as removing the domain from @local_domains_maps
in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf
spamassassin is still running spamtest with that, if one really like to
destingt domains from each other make a policy
On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote:
How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited rules
of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive
ones
make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and
10 would be tested before 0
Benny Pedersen wrote:
can you change it to list reverse, so freemail domains is all other then
what is not freemail domain ?
this is imho more simple to knwo where to pay for email then to know with
domains is free :-)
So... every time someone registers a new domain name for their start-up
Am 26.06.2008 um 18:26 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam
using SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
required_score is set to high value of 9 to
On Thu, June 26, 2008 18:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for everyone's tips..
tips will stop from me when you cc me and post on maillist
Stupid question:
there is only stupid answers
what is the difference between whitelist_auth and def_whitelist_auth?
2 diff scores
--
Benny
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 18:26 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam using
SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
On Thu, June 26, 2008 16:39, Jost Krieger wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:02:18AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, June 25, 2008 23:39, Bob Proulx wrote:
By what method did you recieve that URL?
dsn bounce
Could you send the whole DSN, please?
i deleted it, but see the openspf link
Am 26.06.2008 um 19:31 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 18:26 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my
spam using SA:
All mails are piped
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Generally speaking, it's a bad idea to fiddle with the threshold as all the
base rulesets are scored by the masscheck process with the assumption that
5 is spammy.
Sorry, I don't understand this. What is difference between changing the
threshold
On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 17:13, ram wrote:
How do I enforce SA to wait for results negative short circuited
rules
of higher priority before shorcicuiting mail as spam due to positive
ones
make priority positive not negative, default all
On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote:
That is not correct.
so then sagrey is brokken
Negative numbers come before positive numbers.
nope
order is positive to negative
you might find it is correct by testing more :)
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ?
On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and
10 would be tested before 0 :-)
And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote:
Negative numbers come
On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Larry Nedry wrote:
On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start
with, and
10 would be tested before 0 :-)
And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26,
On Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2008 Florian Lindner wrote:
Can I use two different bayes DBs? One for my family without training
(just the auto train functions) and one for me that is trained?
You don't want that, really. If you use a trained bayes, it helps all.
You do not have to have all spam
ram wrote:
Hi
In my local.cf I have
--
score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100
priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800
shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on
shortcircuit RCVD_IN_XBL spam
--
So I expect RCVD_IN_XBL to be evaluated after
On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote:
Benny, you might want to read the docs:
docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not working
so here
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Jun 25, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
then stop cc me
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
tests=FM_FAKE_HELO_VERIZON,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
designates 206.46.173.3 as permitted sender)
On Fri, June 27, 2008 02:08, Jo Rhett wrote:
I'm sorry, but you're a constant source of backscatter, Benny.
and you are a constant ignorant sending me cc
get a life
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Jun 26, 2008, at 5:43 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
and you are a constant ignorant sending me cc
get a life
Personal attacks are not relevant to the topic.
Sending someone a CC to a message they sent, and to which their mail
headers sets reply-to, is only a problem in Bennys mind. But he
Dave, what are you complaining about? This thread went sideways
without my involvement. I was replying to someone else's query about
Benny's mail servers sending back random SPF failure backscatter
messages.
On Jun 26, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Dave Koontz wrote:
Jo, didn't you get your answer
On Jun 26, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 23:09, Larry Nedry wrote:
Benny, you might want to read the docs:
docs needs updating, all test i have done is showing this is not
working
so here
Hmmm then you are running a faulty or modified version I guess,
On Fri, June 27, 2008 03:09, Jo Rhett wrote:
Personal attacks are not relevant to the topic.
hmm
AppleMail is the only mua i have seen that cant make a reply to maillist
without sending cc
you talk like its my problem right ?
is AppleMail the only option you have ?
if i had to use such bad
Fer the love of Pete guys, take this offline. This has *nothing* to do
with SpamAssassin other than making me wish my system would toss this
whole damn thread.
People and their delicate egos...
*grumble*
Rubin
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 04:13 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, June 27, 2008
On Fri, June 27, 2008 04:28, Rubin Bennett wrote:
?People and their delicate egos...
*grumble*
smile :)
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0-4.1mdv2008.1
another mua is found brokken
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 04:40, Matt Kettler wrote:
I'll attempt to do so. Didn't realize you disliked it.
its like asking 2 times for the same answer and wonder why no answer
Well then set a Reply-to header to point to the list when you post
here... That's
Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 18:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for everyone's tips..
tips will stop from me when you cc me and post on maillist
No big deal; use Procmail to suppress double-delivery instead of getting your
panties in a twist. Also
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 19:48 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
ram wrote:
Hi
In my local.cf I have
--
score USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -100
priority USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST -1000
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -800
shortcircuit USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST on
shortcircuit RCVD_IN_XBL
44 matches
Mail list logo
