Michael Scheidell schrieb:
Wasn't there a standard at one time, return something different (test) if
you queries 2.0.0.127.{dnsblacklist}? If it returned (at least) '127.0.0.2'
and a list of other valid bitflags. that meant that the dnsbl was up and
running? Anything else and it wasn't?
See
Michael Scheidell wrote:
...and I bet there are still commercial anti-spam products using
dsbl.org because they haven't figured it out either :-)
Wasn't there a standard at one time, return something different (test) if
you queries 2.0.0.127.{dnsblacklist}?
There's a draft or two that
419 scammers are abusing the Yahoos I have a new email announce
service
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/scam1.eml.txt
The scammer sets the message and sends the spams thru yahoos servers
And the mails would go thru clean
Initially these were very few , but now the numbers are growing.
Yahoo
Jason Haar writes:
McDonald, Dan wrote:
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - Why didn't the
SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better. I for one am impressed
with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
maintain it. But most of them have real
Hi,
I seem to remember that SpamAssassin has a way to force the overall score of
an email to a particular value, regardless of which rules match - very
useful for testing how your mail setup deals with mail of different spam
levels.
Can anyone remind me how to do it please? I've spent some time
Adding
bodyCTYME_IXHASH eval:ixhashtest('ctyme.ixhash.net')
lets the scan times get significantly longer in SA 3.1.8 and 3.2.3 and
in SA 3.1.8 generates:
ixhash timeout reached at /etc/mail/spamassassin/iXhash.pm line 76
The timeout effect resembles last Wednesday when
mouss writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
[snip]
In fairness -- if you drop mail with no rDNS, you are dropping 3.6% of
legit email in general, going by the test results for our RDNS_NONE
rule... ;)
It just came to my mind that RDNS_NONE does not mean the client does not
have a
Wolfgang Zeikat schrieb:
Do others also see that effect with ctyme.ixhash.net?
yes, thats why i added
ixhash_timeout 10
to my configuration (maybe hardware/bandwith on ctyme will be upgraded)
regards
jd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jan Doberstein schrieb:
Wolfgang Zeikat schrieb:
Do others also see that effect with ctyme.ixhash.net?
yes, thats why i added
ixhash_timeout 10
to my configuration (maybe hardware/bandwith on ctyme will be upgraded)
regards
jd
local issue, should be OK by now.
Dirk
Gene Heskett schrieb:
Greetings;
I fired off this script, named sa-update.cron, but which has been disabled in
the crontab since someone here said it was a waste of time, and now it seems
to be hung. Running it as root this time.
Maybe you want to run sa-update -D or check your logs for
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:51:37PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
[Pardon the spam; thought this new blacklist might be worth at
least trying.]
Apparently Barracuda will be publishing a free-to-use sender
blacklist called BRBL:
http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl
In case someone shares my
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:13:29PM +0200, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm the author of the iXhash plugin, a piece of code that computes a
variety of 'fuzzy checksums' along the lines of the NiXSpam project (run
by the German IT magazine iX).
I would like to express my appreciation of
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:27:52PM +0200, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:13:29PM +0200, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm the author of the iXhash plugin, a piece of code that computes a
variety of 'fuzzy checksums' along the lines of the NiXSpam project (run
Original Message
Subject: Travel Assistance to ApacheCon US 2008 - 3 days to apply!
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:10:19 +1000
From: Gav... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*- Apologies to those PMCs that already got this email. The first attempt I
made was rejected by at
Vidar Tyldum Hansen schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:27:52PM +0200, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:13:29PM +0200, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm the author of the iXhash plugin, a piece of code that computes a
variety of 'fuzzy checksums' along the lines
Hi There,
I have recently been getting a huge increase in the number of emails
which are being marked as spam. In those emails I see that the headers
say RDNS_NONE. It seems that in most cases the remote servers in the
header do in fact reverse resolve. I have checked randomly in about 30
On 9/27/2008 5:27 PM, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:13:29PM +0200, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm the author of the iXhash plugin, a piece of code that computes a
variety of 'fuzzy checksums' along the lines of the NiXSpam project (run
by the German IT magazine
On 29.09.08 14:14, Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
I have recently been getting a huge increase in the number of emails
which are being marked as spam. In those emails I see that the headers
say RDNS_NONE. It seems that in most cases the remote servers in the
header do in fact reverse resolve. I have
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
I guess this list is the best place to ask those of you who use the
plugin for feedback. I'd appreciate any comments and information an
hit rates, FPs and such
Stats for the last 12 hours:
70% hitrate on spam.
0,1% hitrate on ham.
3000 emails in corpus.
0.1%
ram wrote:
419 scammers are abusing the Yahoos I have a new email announce
service
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/scam1.eml.txt
According to the Received headers, it travelled via: GB, India, Korea,
US, then Taiwan before getting to its destination (munged by you for I
don't know what
Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
Hi There,
I have recently been getting a huge increase in the number of emails
which are being marked as spam. In those emails I see that the headers
say RDNS_NONE.
unless you modified the score, this is irrelevant. the default is
score RDNS_NONE 0.1
Justin Mason wrote:
mouss writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
[snip]
In fairness -- if you drop mail with no rDNS, you are dropping 3.6% of
legit email in general, going by the test results for our RDNS_NONE
rule... ;)
It just came to my mind that RDNS_NONE does not mean the client does not
With the LogScannedMessages plugin - is there a way to capture the
contents of a message *after* SA scans it?
Cheers,
-r
--
Roy McMorran
Systems Administrator
MDI Biological Laboratory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roy McMorran writes:
With the LogScannedMessages plugin - is there a way to capture the
contents of a message *after* SA scans it?
if you scan it with the command line scanner, using the same
configuration, the results should be identical ;)
--j.
Jan Doberstein wrote:
Wolfgang Zeikat schrieb:
Do others also see that effect with ctyme.ixhash.net?
yes, thats why i added
ixhash_timeout 10
to my configuration (maybe hardware/bandwith on ctyme will be upgraded)
regards
jd
For what it's worth I'm the one who is providing
Hi all:
I'm learning a bit of SpamAssassin and its plugins. I'm not pretty sure
if some of them are really working (i.e. SPF plugin) so I run:
# spamassassin --lint -D 21 | less
... looking for error/warning messages and I found some of them.
I would specially like to know if
Hello All,
There were so many messages regarding this new Block List, I have to
admit I have not read them all. I get the general idea that this new
Barracuda Reputation Block List isn't all that hot.
For instance, how do Barracuda generate their Block List? I don't think
this has been answered
On Monday 29 September 2008, Matthias Haegele wrote:
Gene Heskett schrieb:
Greetings;
I fired off this script, named sa-update.cron, but which has been disabled
in the crontab since someone here said it was a waste of time, and now it
seems to be hung. Running it as root this time.
Maybe
Jason Voorhees wrote:
Hi all:
I'm learning a bit of SpamAssassin and its plugins. I'm not pretty sure
if some of them are really working (i.e. SPF plugin) so I run:
# spamassassin --lint -D 21 | less
... looking for error/warning messages and I found some of them.
I would specially like to
hi,
is there some kind of tool, that can monitor spamassassin and tell, how many
mails are processed and how much is marked as spam ...
Many thanks
BR Niels
hi,
is there some kind of good working plugin/module/software that quarantines spam
mails on server and sends a e.g. a daily, or weekly spam report to the
according user, and the user can release some of the mails or delete them ?
BR Niels
Niels Przybilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there some kind of tool, that can monitor spamassassin and tell,
how many mails are processed and how much is marked as spam ...
Depending on how SA integrates into your mail flow, and how/where it
logs, grep(1) along with wc(1) should suffice. You
Niels Przybilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there some kind of good working plugin/module/software that
quarantines spam mails on server and sends a e.g. a daily, or weekly
spam report to the according user, and the user can release some of
the mails or delete them ?
Yes, but without knowing
Hi Sahil,
I am sorry ... i forgot ...
I use a centos Server where all the mails go through and then are delivered to
mailboxes on the system.
BR Niels
34 matches
Mail list logo
