Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a filter server in a private LAN.
Just a quick observation - does the machine on the private lan have
Internet
Daniel J McDonald schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:32 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a filter
Ned Slider schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a filter server in a private LAN.
Just a quick observation - does the machine on the private
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin
are
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a filter server in a private LAN.
Basically, mail server receives mail via SMTP, and the mails are
checked on another machine.
I think
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a filter server in a private LAN.
You need to add the public and private IP's of
Duane Hill schrieb:
(...)
I run an SMTP server here on my workstation. This is how I have it
set up and works perfect:
clear_trusted_networks
clear_internal_networks
Is your amavisd-new on an external machine to the SMTP server?
I don't use amavisd-new. I was just talking about
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on
a machine with a public IP address, and
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Yes, I tried running spamassassin -D /tmp/email.eml
It checks against URIBL if there is a link inside the message body.
It doesn't seem to check against DNSBL at all.
Can you post a link to your .cf files and the spamd run arguments ?
Regards,
Rick
Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
Duane Hill schrieb:
(...)
I run an SMTP server here on my workstation. This is how I have it
set up and works perfect:
clear_trusted_networks
clear_internal_networks
Is your amavisd-new on an external machine to the SMTP server?
I don't use amavisd-new. I was
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a filter server in a private LAN.
You need to add the
Yes, I tried running spamassassin -D /tmp/email.eml
It checks against URIBL if there is a link inside the message body.
It doesn't seem to check against DNSBL at all.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
Check these type of things, this is a cut from one of our
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP
Hi!
I've noticed a strange behavior on a server I maintain and after 2 days
trying to figure it out by monitoring the server and searching the web I
still cannot determine the cause of the problem.
I'm running cPanel with Exim+Spamassassin.
In the last few days, during some specific periods we
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the wrong
users in the same thread.
For example usera has whitelist_from_rcvd *.sonic.net sonic.net setup. If
userb gets sent mail that is
processed by that
Please help - I don't know what to do about this. Am I
missing something fundamental? Can anyone offer some
insight? Thank you. --mark--
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Hedges [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
John Hardin wrote:
While shit has happened too many times, I don't see why a browser would
do PTR lookup when given an IP.
If security settings are defined by the server's hostname or domain name
you'd kinda have to, or else say that all numeric-IP URLs are inherently
untrustworthy.
In
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:33 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the
wrong users in the same thread.
For example usera has whitelist_from_rcvd *.sonic.net sonic.net
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:33 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the
wrong users in the same thread.
For example usera has whitelist_from_rcvd *.sonic.net sonic.net
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
To be a little more helpful and less snippy -- if you want more detailed
answers, and check if it might be a different bug than the one
mentioned, telling us about your SA version would be a smart first
move...
I wasn't
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:02 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
To be a little more helpful and less snippy -- if you want more detailed
answers, and check if it might be a different bug than the one
mentioned, telling us about
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:16:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
William, please search bugzilla for duplicates first. If you're positive
this issue hasn't been reported before, please feel free to file a new
bug, adding as much details as possible. Thanks.
I did search and could only
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:19 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:16:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
William, please search bugzilla for duplicates first. If you're positive
this issue hasn't been reported before, please feel free to file a new
bug, adding as much
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:31:03PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
However, given that other user settings actually do work, this might
even be isolated to some particular code, rather than a widespread oops.
I could be wrong but it seems to only be happening with the whitelist_from_rcvd
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:45:12AM -0700, martinezpt wrote:
Hi!
I've noticed a strange behavior on a server I maintain and after 2 days
trying to figure it out by monitoring the server and searching the web I
still cannot determine the cause of the problem.
I'm running cPanel with
Thank you for your suggestion!
I listed the content of the user's .spamassassin folder and found some files
that were not on the other user's folders, such as:
bayes_toks.new
bayes.lock
I renamed all the files and have been monitoring the server for over an hour
and the problem has not occurred
On 09/10/2008 11:57 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:33 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the
wrong users in the same thread.
For example
On 09/10/2008 12:16 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:02 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I replied with more information to Daryl's post but I must
have sent it directly to him instead of the list. I don't
29 matches
Mail list logo
