On 09.02.09 22:09, RobertH wrote:
after a few, i kinda figured that it wasnt in 3.2.x yet i was still trying
to understand why on the website and then the download link page has that
info at the bottom.
because users tend to complain to authors who have no possibility of
affecting servers
RobertH wrote on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:09:02 -0800:
so the bottom line is that page should be edited / corrected and i am still
wanting to find the right example to make this file
/etc/mail/spamassassin/10_local_report.cf
am i chasing a ghost for no reason?
System Administrators
Please
On 9-Feb-2009, at 23:02, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
10_misc.cf isn't in 3.2, 3.1 was the last version to have it.
In 3.2 it's called 10_default_prefs.cf.
You should have it installed in the default rules dir, probably
/usr/share/spamassassin.
/usr/local/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf on
Jason:
you said if I came up with a patch (and this is the first one) for ooo
messages, I should send it to you.
consider that ooo messages, AND, read recipet messages will be generated
by the recipients MTA, will NOT include any of the original message, and
therefore cannot bw whitelisted
matus and others
i hadnt ever seen that info before and was just checking to see what it was
all about
first of all, the info on the SA website download area is outdated. bad
info.
second of all, i was trying to figure out if it was talking about getting
valid info to people and if it could be
What is it that you don't understand in this description?
Don't you find report_template ? Did you notice that is says
something like ?
Kai
kai
i was only trying to find out if there was something that could benefit
clients or people that email them and save our organization time
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 07:36 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
I have a cron event that sends output of pflogsum to me each day. I
don't have any special handling of these messages in procmail, so they
get processed by spamc/spamd along with everything else. Despite a
lot of training with sa-learn,
The information on the download page should be corrected to point to the right
file. Or perhaps removed entirely: when you build from source, the build
procedure prompts you for site contact information and puts it into the
10_default_prefs.cf file. It is also put into the sa-update script,
Hi,
I have been looking at installing spam assassin on a small network I have setup
at home. The machine that I am setting up spam assassin on does not have
internet access. So the question is how can I setup spam assassin or more
precisely how do I setup sa-update to link to a file I
Hello,
I've got SA with a few features installed and it's working great and
has been for a while.
However, over the past few weeks I've had a few select users complain
about receiving 3-4 thousand bounce messages per day from what appears
to be mail delivery error messages. From what I can
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Daniel Berry wrote:
The machine that I am setting up spam assassin on does not have internet
access.
Not to be snarky, but if it doesn't have internet access how is email
getting to it?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
Hello,
I've got SA with a few features installed and it's working great and
has been for a while.
Enable the vbounce detector.
See 20_vbounce.cf
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
|SECNAP Network Security
Finalist 2009 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 11:14 -0600, Johnson, S wrote:
However, over the past few weeks I've had a few select users complain
about receiving 3-4 thousand bounce messages per day from what appears
to be mail delivery error messages. From what I can tell it's the
spammer spoofing the sender
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Johnson, S wrote:
However, over the past few weeks I've had a few select users complain
about receiving 3-4 thousand bounce messages per day from what appears
to be mail delivery error messages. From what I can tell it's the
spammer spoofing the sender with their user ID
This isn't coming from within our network... Someone on the outside is
using these email addresses to send their spam. We just get the
responses when they try to send to a person that doesn't exist.
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Johnson, S wrote:
This isn't coming from within our network... Someone on the outside is
using these email addresses to send their spam. We just get the
responses when they try to send to a person that doesn't exist.
That's what I understood you to be saying.
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Johnson, S wrote:
However, over the past few weeks I've had a few select users complain
about receiving 3-4 thousand bounce messages per day from what appears
to be mail delivery error messages. From what I can tell it's the
spammer spoofing the sender
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:37:54 +0100:
pflogsum
postfix log summary
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Please DO subscribe to a mailing list before posting, to avoid
unnecessary moderation work and delays.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 18:57 +, Daniel Berry wrote:
I have been looking at installing spam assassin on a small network I
have setup
We're running Spamassasin on three machines, two Fedora 8 and one the
latest CENTOS. We're trying to move all of the SA installations to
CENTOS. These are MX servers that front an Exchange server.
The systems are all set up using the same .cf and init.d files, but
we're seeing a difference. We
On 2/10/09 at 8:38 PM +0100 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I don't see a problem to do this. Really wonder why that machine dos not
have Internet access, though. Not to be snarky either, but I'd be
interested in the answer to John's question, too. ;)
I can't speak for Daniel but I have an offline
[...] So the question is how can I setup spam
assassin or more precisely how do I setup sa-update to link to a file
I have downloaded via another machine ? [...]
Ah, after re-reading this -- I guess there's your issue right there. :)
sa-update doesn't need to be linked to the updated
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 15:04 -0600, Larry Nedry wrote:
On 2/10/09 at 8:38 PM +0100 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I don't see a problem to do this. Really wonder why that machine dos not
have Internet access, though. Not to be snarky either, but I'd be
interested in the answer to John's question,
Daniel, please keep the thread on-list, unless you intend to send a
private message. I am not the only one who can help you.
Oh, and do subscribe.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 21:30 +, Daniel Berry wrote:
Ahh ok, So what triggers SA to update if
Here's some great news for everyone who's thinking of
traveling to Amsterdam for this year's ApacheCon Europe. The Early Bird
deadline has been extended to Friday, February 13th - and remember,
there is a discount of 150 Euro on registration for anyone staying at
the Mövenpick Hotel. Register at
is anyone finding any value in scanning html picture spam of size 250kB to
500kB in size?
what are you using?
- rh
26 matches
Mail list logo
