Hi,
I ran sa-update and nothing was wrong . After completing its work I run
stat /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/ and show following results:
File: `/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/'
Size: 4096Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 802h/2050d Inode: 8503299
Thank you for all you answers.
SA is setup as a demon.
I have managed to solve this problem after turning on debug mode for bayes
(-D bayes).
I was able to correlate that 10% of my messages not scanned by bayes are
connected with this error:
bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB R/O:
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
anything but a spam and on the top seems like from same spamers as
they picked emails that they thought would be good to spam and keep
on spaming them
Different domains -- are these
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 10:33 +0430, amir reza rahbaran wrote:
I ran sa-update and nothing was wrong . After completing its work I
run stat /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/ and show following results:
Please note that sa-update is silent, unless there are errors --
regardless whether there was an
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 01:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
You need to have it learn at least 200 messages of both 'ham' and 'spam'
before it has enough data to switch to working mode. So sort them into
separate directories, and have it learn both a clean inbox as ham, and an all
spam
Please keep list-posts on list, please Reply to List.
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 19:27 +0430, amir reza rahbaran wrote:
yes, you`re right and the sa-update exit with code 1 and this is the
result of
Yes, an exit code of 1 means there is no update. It does *not* indicate
any error.
update report
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
As you can see, formail has added the Delivered-To: header on the top
of the message, before the From_ header and that it is what is
corrupting the message.
That is very odd.
Any suggestions?
Run the formail command in your procmail
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
With most backends, mail storage formats -- be it local or IMAP --
moving spam out of the Inbox isn't sufficient to have it *clean*. The
source message that's just moved out often still physically remains in
the folder, unnoticed, until one
Hi
since a small time, my spamassassin server said me :
Apr 21 18:56:53 spam-1 spamd[523]: pyzor: check failed: internal error
i don't know why ;=) anyone know what is the process for resolv this
probleme with
my spamassassin ?
bye
jerome
When I run sa-compile with some of the non-standard rule sets, I'm getting
these two errors:
FreeBSD: Registering installation in the package database
Cannot create directory
/var/db/pkg/bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin-CompiledRegexps-body_0-1.0: File exists
FreeBSD: Registering installation in the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2009, alexus wrote:
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
anything but a spam and on the top seems like from same spamers as
they
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, alexus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2009, alexus wrote:
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out of box SA, i have few domains that i dont get
anything but a spam and on the top
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, alexus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2009, alexus wrote:
i'm trying to teach my SA whats spam
it's a brand new out
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, alexus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2009, alexus
alexus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote:
an example
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 97779, pid: 97780, t: 3.8809s
scanners: regex: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95/m:50/d:9252 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
By looking at the sub-rules' names I got the impression they are just
random. But maybe they actually are somehow based on the rule's content?
Never checked. Justin?
Justin Mason replied:
yep, they're derived from a hash of the string.
Is that documented, or could
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 21:25, James Wilkinson
sa-u...@aprilcottage.co.uk wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
By looking at the sub-rules' names I got the impression they are just
random. But maybe they actually are somehow based on the rule's content?
Never checked. Justin?
Justin Mason
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
claym c...@pfd.net wrote:
When I run sa-compile with some of the non-standard rule sets, I'm
getting these two errors:
FreeBSD: Registering installation in the package database
Cannot create directory
RW-15 wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
claym c...@pfd.net wrote:
When I run sa-compile with some of the non-standard rule sets, I'm
getting these two errors:
FreeBSD: Registering installation in the package database
Cannot create directory
Set export DISABLE_BSDPAN=1 in your scripts.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:41 PM, claym wrote:
When you install a cpan package outside of the FreeBSD ports/
packaging
system, a entry is made in /var/db/pkg/, so you can deinstall it with
pkg_delete. For some reason the same thing happens when you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you know if are there something like the old 'Top200 SpamCop
Relays' 70_sc_top200 ?
It seems to me 70_sc_top200 is an automatic rule, which
tautologically shouldn't involve any ninja at all in its updating.
YES! I've actually been working on
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, alexus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, alexus wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
it gave BAYES_99, yet it still think it's autolearn=no, and it still
doesnt think this is SPAM
Autolearn can't trigger from BAYES hits because it's used to
Thank you very much Katsten :)
2009/4/21 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de
Please keep list-posts on list, please Reply to List.
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 19:27 +0430, amir reza rahbaran wrote:
yes, you`re right and the sa-update exit with code 1 and this is the
result of
Yes, an
24 matches
Mail list logo
