Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 10:22 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
So, yes, the scores are higher again -- and have been for over 2
years
now. ;) However, I wouldn't say creeping back in, cause it never
has been manually fixed or adjusted, but
Per Jessen wrote:
That's still ham. Did you see a FP due to these rules plus others
(which ones?), or are you merely about the cumulative score for these
on their own?
I noticed an FP on a mail from networksolutions, and judging from my
logs, on the 18Sep I had 9 emails that scored just
Hi,
I've searched the FAQ, but found no help. At least that I understand.
I've a Ubuntu 8.04.1 server, running plesk .
When I first rented the server, I forgot to buy the spamassassin key for
plesk. Now, they tell me I've to change to a different server, paying much
more to use spamassassin.
I've
Hi,
I have an mbox with about a 100 messages in it from a few days ago.
The mbox is a combination of spam and ham. What is the best way to run
SA through these messages again, so I can catch the ones that have
URLs in them that weren't on the blacklist at the time they were
received?
Must I
Hi,
Do you just want to re-scan the whole mbox and see what rules hit now
for research reasons?
That's a good start, but I'd like to see if I can break out the ham to
train bayes.
There's no way to (directly) get SA to modify email that's already in an
mbox file. The mass-check and sa-learn
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
I have an mbox with about a 100 messages in it from a few days ago.
The mbox is a combination of spam and ham. What is the best way to run
SA through these messages again, so I can catch the ones that have
URLs in them that weren't on the blacklist at the time they
You probably want spamassassin --mbox. :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
spamassassin --mbox infile outfile.
If you're talking about sa-learn, though, it also knows --mbox.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:46 PM, MySQL Student mysqlstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah,
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
Do you just want to re-scan the whole mbox and see what rules hit now
for research reasons?
That's a good start, but I'd like to see if I can break out the ham to
train bayes.
There's no way to (directly) get SA to modify email that's already in an
Hi,
You probably want spamassassin --mbox. :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
spamassassin --mbox infile outfile.
My apologies if it wasn't clear, but these messages have already been
marked by SA. Some are ham, and the rest are FPs that I'd like to
Hi,
You probably want spamassassin --mbox. :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
spamassassin --mbox infile outfile.
My apologies if it wasn't clear, but these messages have already been
Wait, my mistake. I read that too fast. Does that work, and rewrite
On Sep 20, 2009, at 20:45, MySQL Student mysqlstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you all for your help. The mbox split suggestion is a good
one. I'll follow that route and post my experience later.
formail -s is the way to go.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
You probably want spamassassin --mbox. :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
spamassassin --mbox infile outfile.
If you're talking about sa-learn, though, it also knows --mbox.
Yes, but he's got mixed spam and nonspam in one mbox.
On 19/09/2009 3:33 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/16/2009 11:47 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the
On man 21 sep 2009 04:47:23 CEST, MySQL Student wrote
Wait, my mistake. I read that too fast. Does that work, and rewrite
the X-Spam-Status header?
imho spamassassin always remove its own known headers, but only once
it can add self so yes the trick is to retest, where you will see if
its
14 matches
Mail list logo
