nathang wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to setup an email account in cPanel so that I receive *all*
incoming emails that contain a specific word in the subject line.
It would be critical that I get 100% of the emails sent to me (that contain
a specific word in the subject line), and that none of them get
nathang wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to setup an email account in cPanel so that I receive *all*
incoming emails that contain a specific word in the subject line.
It would be critical that I get 100% of the emails sent to me (that contain
a specific word in the subject line), and that none of them
Warren Togami wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-beta1 is now available for testing
Builds cleanly on CentOS 5.4 64-bit w/ perl 5.10.0.
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, R-Elists wrote:
Nonsense. I had to score this list -2000 just to keep it from
scoring so darn high that it was hitting the 'automatic'
rejection at the SMTP gate before any of my whitelists could
function.
Charles,
you would be better off properly whitelisting the SA mailing
From: Warren Togami [mailto:wtog...@redhat.com]
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0-beta1 available
...
- if module Digest::SHA is not available, a module Digest::SHA1
will be used, but at least one of them must be installed;
a DKIM plugin requires Digest::SHA (the older
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Yes, this is the grand new frontier of e-mail marketing. Technically, you
*are* opting-in. It meets satisfactory criteria because you are using some
other form of identification to substantiate that you are *really* you
(you are buying stuff). But
Some of my users have people they normally to corrospond with, but who
also send large numbers of massivly CC'd jokes.
Does anybody have an example of a rule that would score messages with
large numbers of CCs higher, without hosing filtering for the user's
normal messages?
Thanks!
Terry
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
Some of my users have people they normally to corrospond with, but who also
send large numbers of massivly CC'd jokes.
Does anybody have an example of a rule that would score messages with large
numbers of CCs higher, without hosing filtering for the
Terry Carmen wrote:
Some of my users have people they normally to corrospond with, but who
also send large numbers of massivly CC'd jokes.
Does anybody have an example of a rule that would score messages with
large numbers of CCs higher, without hosing filtering for the user's
normal
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
Some of my users have people they normally to corrospond with, but
who also send large numbers of massivly CC'd jokes.
Does anybody have an example of a rule that would score messages with
large numbers of CCs higher, without
Per Jessen wrote:
Terry Carmen wrote:
Some of my users have people they normally to corrospond with, but who
also send large numbers of massivly CC'd jokes.
Does anybody have an example of a rule that would score messages with
large numbers of CCs higher, without hosing filtering for the
On 08/12/2009 16:35, Charles Gregory wrote:
Sadly, with such a diverse user base, I cannot use a single Bayes DB
that would work well for all our users. My SMTP gateway (Mail Avenger)
works best if mail is scanned for *all* recipients, and so it is not
possible to use individual per-user
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 08/12/2009 16:35, Charles Gregory wrote:
. My SMTP gateway (Mail Avenger) works best if mail is scanned for
*all* recipients, and so it is not possible to use individual per-user
Bayes.
In cases were there is only a single recipient, I run
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Yes, this is the grand new frontier of e-mail marketing.
Technically, you
*are* opting-in. It meets satisfactory criteria because you are
using some
other form of identification to substantiate that you are *really* you
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Save your bullets.
Habeas is history... it's been swallowed and the new mothership will
be in SA 3.3.0
meanwhile you'll probably want to disable the relevant rules.
How about the DNSWL rules? Are they toast as well, or might they have
more sane default scores?
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0-beta1
running on Perl version 5.10.1
Solaris 9 Sparc
I am getting the following errors in make test:
t/timeout.t ... 5/27 # Failed test 5 in t/timeout.t at line
63
t/timeout.t ... 7/27 # Failed test 7 in t/timeout.t at line
Hi,
I've just installed Spamassassin on an old/dedicated Mail Server. It runs fine.
When I compile rules on that box with sa-compile, it takes forever,
~2-3 hours per run.
I've got plenty of CPU lying around -- on different arch/OS-es.
Typically, for just cc tasks, I can use 'distcc' or Suse's
Assuming they below refers to Habeas. Please ignore this mail if it
refers to Return Path.
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
They have had the option to do this already for years, now, and have
elected to use implied threats to the world's ISP's, rather than
regularly participating on this list.
To
On Tuesday December 8 2009 23:27:19 Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0-beta1
running on Perl version 5.10.1
Solaris 9 Sparc
I am getting the following errors in make test:
t/timeout.t ... 5/27 # Failed test 5 in t/timeout.t at
line 63 t/timeout.t
Thanks for testing! Which version of a perl module Time::HiRes
do you have installed? See what is reported by:
$ perl -MTime::HiRes -le 'print Time::HiRes-VERSION'
Could you please try upgrading this module if yours is rather old,
and see if that helps.
P.S., does the following change to
Dear List Members,
As you are all aware there has been a lot of name calling going on
lately and, in my opinion, at least one instance of what could be
considered a threat. This is not acceptable behaviour in our community.
What you are probably not aware of is that there has also been a number
...if you feel the need to reply, please reply to this email. Not the
original one in the thread. There is no need to copy responses to
bo...@apache.org and priv...@sa.
Thanks!
Daryl
On 08/12/2009 11:01 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dear List Members,
As you are all aware there has been
22 matches
Mail list logo
