Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread mamalos
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mamalos wrote on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:01:53 -0800 (PST): and at least one of the Greek words is not capitalized, Greek? In a subject? Encoded, unencoded? I assume that through this list, someone who is an editor of these rulesets may be informed and correct this

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread Mike Cardwell
On 19/01/2010 09:11, mamalos wrote: and at least one of the Greek words is not capitalized, Greek? In a subject? Encoded, unencoded? I assume that through this list, someone who is an editor of these rulesets may be informed and correct this misbehavior. You can submit it as a bug. But

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread mamalos
Mike Cardwell-16 wrote: On 19/01/2010 09:11, mamalos wrote: and at least one of the Greek words is not capitalized, Greek? In a subject? Encoded, unencoded? I assume that through this list, someone who is an editor of these rulesets may be informed and correct this misbehavior.

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread Mike Cardwell
On 19/01/2010 10:07, mamalos wrote: I just pasted that email into spamalyser.com and it gave this: http://spamalyser.com/v/u32d10ix/mime The subject looks fully capitalised to me when decoded? I'm not overly proficient on my Greek though. -- Mike Cardwell: UK based IT Consultant, LAMP

Problems with false positives

2010-01-19 Thread Taylon Silmer
Hello guys! I have a lot of mail servers running spamassassin and I never had false positives problems. Recently I installed more one server and I'm having a lot of false positives problem with it. I understand that spamassassin is a software and it can get wrong sometimes, the another servers

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread mamalos
Mike Cardwell-16 wrote: On 19/01/2010 10:07, mamalos wrote: I just pasted that email into spamalyser.com and it gave this: http://spamalyser.com/v/u32d10ix/mime The subject looks fully capitalised to me when decoded? I'm not overly proficient on my Greek though. -- Mike Cardwell

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Mamalos wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:11:49 -0800 (PST): The mail is encoded as well as the subject. Here is an example: Yeah, and they are lower-case, I see. So, where should I report this bug? I think the problem here is determination of capital/non-capital letters in other scripts than

Re: Problems with false positives

2010-01-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.01.10 10:52, Taylon Silmer wrote: I have a lot of mail servers running spamassassin and I never had false positives problems. Recently I installed more one server and I'm having a lot of false positives problem with it. I understand that spamassassin is a software and it can get wrong

Re: [Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)]

2010-01-19 Thread Jason Bertoch
On 1/18/2010 6:38 PM, mouss wrote: David B Funk a écrit : On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote: Can a list admin disable the spamassas...@hundredacrewood.willspc.net account as we're still getting bounces? Original Message Subject: Delivery Status Notification

Re: Problems with false positives

2010-01-19 Thread Jason Bertoch
On 1/19/2010 7:52 AM, Taylon Silmer wrote: Hello guys! I use: Postfix 2.3.3 Amavis 2.6.4 Spamassassin 3.2.5 CentOS 5.4 with linux kernel 2.6.18 The spamassassin rules are updated and the amavis and postfix configuration files are the same in all servers (so, make no sense to be some problem

Re: Problems with false positives

2010-01-19 Thread ram
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:52 -0200, Taylon Silmer wrote: Hello guys! I have a lot of mail servers running spamassassin and I never had false positives problems. Recently I installed more one server and I'm having a lot of false positives problem with it. I understand that spamassassin is

Re: problem with a date rule

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Kai Schaetzl wrote: rp wrote on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:07:17 -0800: Anyone else having this problem? You should have read the list or googled first. Kai Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with

That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The local.cf fix did not change anything after restarting spamassassin. For some reason

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, Robert Ober ro...@robob.com wrote: Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The local.cf fix did not change

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Daniel McDonald wrote: On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, Robert Oberro...@robob.com wrote: Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The local.cf

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread Charles Gregory
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Mike Cardwell wrote: : Then I don't know the Greek alphabet. The relevant subroutine from : SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeaderEval is below: :$subject =~ s/[^a-zA-Z]//g; # only look at letters I think the 'issue' is that spamassassin *should* have some 'higher level'

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Warren Togami
Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well. Warren

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Warren Togami
On 01/19/2010 10:47 AM, Robert Ober wrote: Warren Togami wrote: Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well. Warren I did not think it was enabled on that machine but it was. I ran sa-update and problem solved. Sorry to 'bother y'all, I should have checked for

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 1/19/10 9:19 AM, Robert Ober ro...@robob.com wrote: Daniel McDonald wrote: On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, Robert Oberro...@robob.com wrote: Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 from that

Re: Wrong functionality of SUBJ_ALL_CAPS in mixed English and Greek subject

2010-01-19 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Mamalos wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:19:30 -0800 (PST): $subject =~ s/[^a-zA-Z]//g; # only look at letters The relevant part seems to be this. It removes all other characters (i9ncluding the Greek ones). As I said, it's hard to determine capitals for each and every language. So,

Re: problem with a date rule

2010-01-19 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I suggest you read the homepage: http://spamassassin.apache.org/ If this didn't help you, then please give more details about how you use SA and what you did to correct the problem. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Robert Ober wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:19:57 -0600: score FH-DATE-PAST-20XX 0.0 which is wrong, the rule has underscores. Read the article on http://spamassassin.apache.org/ Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Spamassassin, no new version ?

2010-01-19 Thread Stephane MAGAND
Hi Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project are dead ? I wan change my mail server, actually with a old version of spamassassin. Can you say me the best choice for best result ? SpamAssassin + ? what rules.cf Pyzor ? Razor ? Dcc ? What RBL ? If i

Re: Spamassassin, no new version ?

2010-01-19 Thread Mikael Syska
Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stephane MAGAND stmagconsult...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project are dead ? Are you even reading the mailing list? or 3.3.0 should published soon. I wan change my mail server, actually with a

Re: Spamassassin, no new version ?

2010-01-19 Thread Aaron Wolfe
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mikael Syska mik...@syska.dk wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stephane MAGAND stmagconsult...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project are dead ? Are you even reading the mailing list? or  

Re: [Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)]

2010-01-19 Thread mouss
Jason Bertoch a écrit : On 1/18/2010 6:38 PM, mouss wrote: David B Funk a écrit : On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote: Can a list admin disable the spamassas...@hundredacrewood.willspc.net account as we're still getting bounces? Original Message Subject: Delivery

Re: That Future Bug

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Ober
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Robert Ober wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:19:57 -0600: score FH-DATE-PAST-20XX 0.0 which is wrong, the rule has underscores. Read the article on http://spamassassin.apache.org/ Kai Thanks, I cut and pasted that from someone's forum post. Fortunately

Re: [Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)]

2010-01-19 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 21:48 +0100, mouss wrote: Jason Bertoch a écrit : This is an list administration problem, not something that every poster here should have to fix locally. Unfortunately, that's only partially true. - if the problem is at the MTA side, then it will show again and

RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread Res
Greetings, Can anyone tell me how the bogon list in this rule is updated? Does it query a live bogon DNS server? The wiki does not explain or say much at all about it. Thanks -- Res What does Windows have that Linux doesn't? - One hell of a lot of bugs!

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread RW
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:19:14 +1000 (EST) Res r...@ausics.net wrote: Greetings, Can anyone tell me how the bogon list in this rule is updated? Does it query a live bogon DNS server? The wiki does not explain or say much at all about it. Thanks It appears to be just a regular

Re: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0 Press Release - Quotes Needed

2010-01-19 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 18/01/2010 1:05 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: How About: As the per-seat costs for any available commercial spamfilter solution exceed the margin for a retail Internet service account, SpamAssassin is the only spamfilter solution usable by ISPs Nothing like the truth, eh? ;-) I'm sure

Re: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.0 Press Release - Quotes Needed

2010-01-19 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
We've delayed when we're going to do the press release so I'm still open to (and looking for) quotes for use in the press release. Please send quotes my way... it's a good way to get free publicity for your organization. Daryl On 17/01/2010 4:45 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Hi All, I'm

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread Res
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, RW wrote: It appears to be just a regular expression: sub check_for_illegal_ip { my ($self, $pms) = @_; foreach my $rcvd ( @{$pms-{relays_untrusted}} ) { # (note this might miss some hits if the Received.pm skips any invalid IPs) foreach my $check ( $rcvd-{ip},

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Res wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, RW wrote: It appears to be just a regular expression: sub check_for_illegal_ip { my ($self, $pms) = @_; foreach my $rcvd ( @{$pms-{relays_untrusted}} ) { # (note this might miss some hits if the Received.pm skips any invalid

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:00:46PM -0800, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Res wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, RW wrote: It appears to be just a regular expression: sub check_for_illegal_ip { my ($self, $pms) = @_; foreach my $rcvd ( @{$pms-{relays_untrusted}} ) { # (note

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread Res
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote: (?:[01257]|(?!127.0.0.)127|22[3-9]|2[3-9]\d|[12]\d{3,}|[3-9]\d\d+)\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+ Thats crazy! It's wrong since 1/8 is now allocated, it also does not detect most other bogon ranges, What is the point of this... Another rule I now need to

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:16:29PM +1000, Res wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote: (?:[01257]|(?!127.0.0.)127|22[3-9]|2[3-9]\d|[12]\d{3,}|[3-9]\d\d+)\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+ Thats crazy! It's wrong since 1/8 is now allocated, it also does not detect most other bogon ranges, What is

Re: RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP Question

2010-01-19 Thread Res
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote: DNS checks would be overkill for a list that doesn't change that often. http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/ has good info, Yes agreed, we have used Robs templates for a long time :) -- Res What does Windows have that Linux doesn't? - One hell of