On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 13:06 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Why does svn update pull in Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.0.tar.gz?
Err, what do you mean exactly? You know, sometimes it really helps
explaining your issue in detail. Anyway, svn update sure doesn't pull in
any such archive here.
On 2010-02-13 04:24, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
panic.chaosreigns.com. IN SPF v=spf1 a:64.71.152.40 -all
No. MTX defines 64.71.152.40 as a legitimate transmitting mail server,
regardless of the domain in the envelope from, From: header, etc..
Popular misconception, it seems.
The SPF
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 12:42 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having trouble getting my mail server to scan outbound emails for spam,
incoming works fine (in as much as that it captures spammy email). Any
feedback would be appreciated. My setup as follows:
[550 lines
On 2010-02-13 04:24, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Still http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
I still have the following comments (wich you didn't answer previously):
* I think there should be a way to tell the world wether you are using
the scheme for a domain (not host) or not. This could
On 2010-02-13 21:48, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like it ties the helo domain to the delivering IP, breaking (broken)
forwarding just like SPF?
Tying the HELO domain to an IP has does not break forwarding. The host
name (including domain) used in HELO is independent from the domain
only does this on ONE system. all have similar setups, same ram, same
cpu, same rev or re2c, same os.
so out of hundreds of systems, why does this one die? why with sa 330
and not sa 325?
(yes, its a sares rule, yes, we don't need them anymore), but sa-compile
is seeing something that is
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 09:45 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
only does this on ONE system. all have similar setups, same ram, same
cpu, same rev or re2c, same os.
so out of hundreds of systems, why does this one die? why with sa 330
and not sa 325?
(yes, its a sares rule, yes, we don't
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
(And of course, if this catches on, you'll have to provide RFC style
documentation.)
See Justins posting from two days back:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark-04.txt
That
Sorry this is off-topic but has anyone successful applied for the Yahoo
Email Complaint Feedback Loop?
On the one hand their website says they have an ISP program based on IP
addresses and CIDR ranges that does not require emails to be signed with
DomainKeys or DKIM and then, on the other
* Jeff Koch jeffk...@intersessions.com:
Sorry this is off-topic but has anyone successful applied for the
Yahoo Email Complaint Feedback Loop?
Yes, I did.
On the one hand their website says they have an ISP program based on
IP addresses and CIDR ranges that does not require emails to be
- Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
(And of course, if this catches on, you'll have to provide RFC
style
documentation.)
See Justins posting from two days back:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
On 02/14, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
The SPF record above says that a host using panic.chaosreigns.com in
HELO should not be allowed to send mail unless it has the IP address
64.71.152.40, regardless of the domain in the envelope from, From:
header, etc..
That's not exactly the same as your
On 02/14, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
Personally I think it is a great idea and anything to help combat the
spam is always a worthwhile effort. Is it possible to resurrect that
proposal and worth with the original authors and perhaps combine
Very simple, via HTTP and a small perl script:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/#blacklist
It's currently empty.
On 02/14, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 02/14, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
* I think there should be a way to tell the world wether you are using
the scheme for a domain (not host)
On 2010-02-14 20:06, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I remembered why (else) I didn't want to do that. It effectively says
Everything else should be rejected. Which will discourage some people
from using it. So you would at least need to provide a way to say Yes,
I'm participating, but
On 02/14, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
1: The participation record is optional, so you only use it if you want
everything else to be rejected.
Yeah. I'm thinking of using the 4th octet to indicate participation, and
the third octet to indicate delegation.
Check for the MTX record first, and if it
Hi,
After upgrading SpamAssassin to 3.3.0 on FreeBSD 8-Stable, spamd doesn't
start anymore and exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of a
PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems that I have to run sa-update first in
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 13:58 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else using this combination, and who uses attachment to,
in particular for low score spam, seeing
no results in the initial warning.txt, as ...
(no report template found)
instead of the SA report?
If you do, I ask
On 02/14, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
* I think you should follow conventions in DNS naming, using an
underscore to signify that the DNS record is a special type of record.
This is quite common.
I didn't like this idea, but I have realized it's the right thing to do.
Now should I use _mtx, or
Nabble allows off-list replies, and apparently even makes it easy to
use? WTF, shouldn't the default be list reply, and anything else
guarded by serious confirmation dialogs?
Awesome, and it even breaks threading. How utterly annoying.
Please keep the thread on-list, replying to the list. Do
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/participant/
Let me know what you think.
I'd really like suggestions on something to use other than participant.
--
If one out of every two hundred American men have the guts to fight
for freedom alone, in secret and from ambush, this country will never
be
On 13/02/2010 6:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
$ sa-update
http: GET http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/909775.tar.gz request failed:
404 Not Found
There was an issue on the source host that has since been resolved.
Daryl
On 2/14/10 9:50 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Bad RAM?
well, it didn't start till SA 3.30, and deleting those two rules stopped
the seg fault and crash..
more likely a bad ST 504 controller.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
*| *SECNAP Network Security
On 02/14, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Now should I use _mtx, or MTAMark style _smtp._srv?
DNS records containing underscores are apparently a pain. In my Bind
config I had to add check-names ignore;. My secondary DNS provider is
responding with REFUSED (I asked them to fix it).
Is it worth
Mbeis wrote on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:19:44 -0800 (PST):
It seems that I have to run sa-update first in order for SA to work. But
sa-update exits with an error too, sa-update -D gives:
I think I have seen a few messages over this weekend about update
problems. There must have been/be some server
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, mbeis wrote:
Feb 14 22:12:46.522 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed:
0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = NOERROR
Feb 14 22:12:46.525 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed:
mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org = NOERROR
channel: no 'mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org' record found, channel
On Saturday February 13 2010 21:42:35 shawnbor wrote:
I'm having trouble getting my mail server to scan outbound emails for spam,
incoming works fine (in as much as that it captures spammy email).
FreeBSD 6, postfix 2.3.2, amavisd-new 2.4.2, spamassassin 3.1.3, mysql 5
How do you know it is
On 02/14, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Is it worth the hassle to have the underscore?
Response from my secondary DNS provider:
Thank you for contacting us. An underscore is only legal for specific
types of DNS records, such as 'SRV'. 'A' records should only contain
letters, numbers and
From: Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net
Sent: Sunday, 2010/February/14 15:27
On 2/14/10 9:50 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Bad RAM?
well, it didn't start till SA 3.30, and deleting those two rules stopped
the seg fault and crash..
more likely a bad ST 504 controller.
Somebody is
MM The usual procedure is:
MM perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install
Ah, that now works only once! Now only
set -e; perl Makefile.PL; make clean; perl Makefile.PL; make; make install
will work each time, even if a few months pass between one's upgrades.
Hmmm, they might want to
On 2/13/2010 9:49 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
ok looks like my problem is because I'm reprocessing a message that already
has an X-Spam-Languages: nothing header in it.
I expected that it wouldn't matter that it was there as it would be removed
and populated accordingly but that is only
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 18:51 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jeff Koch jeffk...@intersessions.com:
Sorry this is off-topic but has anyone successful applied for the
Yahoo Email Complaint Feedback Loop?
Yes, I did.
On the one hand their website says they have an ISP program
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, mbeis wrote:
Feb 14 22:12:46.522 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed:
0.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = NOERROR
Feb 14 22:12:46.525 [11706] dbg: dns: query failed:
mirrors.updates.spamassassin.org = NOERROR
channel: no
33 matches
Mail list logo
