-Original Message-
From: Jim Knuth [mailto:j...@jkart.de]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 6:38 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.1 available
schrieb Michael Scheidell:
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes --
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:25, Martin ma...@ntlworld.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Knuth [mailto:j...@jkart.de]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 6:38 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.1 available
schrieb Michael Scheidell:
On
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 11:58 -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
In my environment, postfix passes the message onto the exchange server
so once it releases the message, I don't have anything to train bayes
with since it's deleted.
Add an 'always_bcc' directive to your Postfix configuration to grab a
Michael Scheidell wrote on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:15:29 -0400:
I have a printscreen from that site (that for some reason I can't email)
Well, everyone can just go there and so for him/herself ;-)
http://www.takeyellow.com/
But the mirror is also there:
http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/
I
O
http://www.takeyellow.com/
But the mirror is also there:
http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/
I agree that combination looks fishy first. But I rather think that this
I think I would worry about the integrety of a mirror like that, but up
to SA folks. if they think its ok to use
Not officially released yet, so consider this RC quality. ports committers
always make minor changes before committing the port update.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144911
it incorporates the DKIM.pm patch to add back in unwhitelist_dkim
the pkg-install will try to ask you to
On 20/03/2010 12:34 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
O
http://www.takeyellow.com/
But the mirror is also there:
http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/
I agree that combination looks fishy first. But I rather think that this
I think I would worry about the integrety of a mirror like
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Mark Martinec wrote:
The offending rule is FILL_THIS_FORM_LONG from 72_active.cf.
I'll look into it.
Fix is in local masscheck testing.
Fix committed.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
try it, pretend you are looking for sa332.
Again, I'm pretty sure you're not supposed to be directed to a mirror
unless it has updated. Although a plain 404 would be better.
with all the problems lately, fake search pages, legit (yahoo search,
doubleclick, etc) serving up malware
