Re: Autowhitelist based on Return-Path: (envelope sender) for mailing list

2011-07-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.07.11 18:05, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path: header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists? [ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ] No. Have you never been subscribed to someone's mailing

Re: spamassassin 3.3.2 rpms for el4 / centos4 etc ???

2011-07-12 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 7/11/2011 7:53 PM, R - elists wrote: It's removal was based at least in part on a belief that it was not actually usable for anybody. You could take it up with the dev list, particularly if you're up for maintaining it in a way that's useful for the major rpm platforms. Either way you

Disable Botnet? (enquiry about fixing IPv6 problem)

2011-07-12 Thread Kārlis Repsons
I wonder how good or bad is my idea to temporarily not load Botnet module? That results in some repeated warnings, but if I load it, there are even more warnings like these: spamd[2882]: Argument 2607:fe70:0:4::a isn't numeric in multiplication (*) at

Re: spamassassin 3.3.2 rpms for el4 / centos4 etc ???

2011-07-12 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:51:55 -0700, R - elists wrote: apologies we missed the memo(s) evidentally doing an rpmbuild -tb after downloading the 3.3.2 tarball doesnt work for rhel4 / centos4 et al? wow... always seemed like a 3 minute process to me anyways, i think ive about exhausted a week

Re: Autowhitelist based on Return-Path: (envelope sender) for mailing list

2011-07-12 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote: On 08.07.11 18:05, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path: header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists? [ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ] No. Have you

RE: spamassassin 3.3.2 rpms for el4 / centos4 etc ???

2011-07-12 Thread R - elists
warren thanks for the info where is the .spec posted ? any tips on the .spec and modifying the tree to get 3.3.2 working with EL4 until such time as EL6 server can be installed and tested please? EL6 isnt that old (comparitively) and lab testing will start on it soon - rh

RE: spamassassin 3.3.2 rpms for el4 / centos4 etc ???

2011-07-12 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:48:51 -0700, R - elists wrote: warren thanks for the info where is the .spec posted ? any tips on the .spec and modifying the tree to get 3.3.2 working with EL4 until such time as EL6 server can be installed and tested please? EL6 isnt that old (comparitively) and

DecodeShortURLs plugin

2011-07-12 Thread Jezz
Hi folks, I've been getting a bit of spam lately that is slipping easily past my SpamAssassin - mostly work from home stuff that is just plain text and a single URL which uses a URL shortening service, and it doesn't hit on much. I've tried to add the DecodeShortURLs plugin (from

Re: DecodeShortURLs plugin

2011-07-12 Thread darxus
On 07/12, Jezz wrote: So my question is this: is there any way I can get the DecodeShortURLs plugin working without the Syslog module requirement? Eg. can I get this plugin to only view Syslog as an optional and not mandatory prerequisite? I certainly don't need the Syslog functionality of

Re: DecodeShortURLs plugin

2011-07-12 Thread Martin Hepworth
Put SA on a dedicated gateway machine then you have problems of SA using up resources on the main mailserver, maybe would sort the issue??? Martin On Tuesday, 12 July 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 07/12, Jezz wrote: So my question is this: is there any way I can get the

Re: DecodeShortURLs plugin

2011-07-12 Thread Axb
On 2011-07-12 15:21, Jezz wrote: Hi folks, I've been getting a bit of spam lately that is slipping easily past my SpamAssassin - mostly work from home stuff that is just plain text and a single URL which uses a URL shortening service, and it doesn't hit on much. I've tried to add the