Greetings,
On 10/17/2014 06:37 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/17/2014 12:13 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/17/2014 06:02 PM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
Greetings,
I'm receiving a specific type of spam which From header is always like:
From: service by foobar u...@example.org
These guys always use by
On 10/20/2014 11:40 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
Greetings,
On 10/17/2014 06:37 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/17/2014 12:13 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/17/2014 06:02 PM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
Greetings,
I'm receiving a specific type of spam which From header is always like:
From: service by
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:13:49 +0100
Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 22:37 -0700, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
The score is only 1.9, 3.5 required. What's going on here?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=3.5
tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
SInce this is about mail and spam, I thought this might be a good place
to ask about nolisting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolisting
I get ~ 7000 messages/day on my server, with ~70% getting tagged as spam.
This is really private mailserver for my side consulting business and
for all the
I'm getting FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD false positives for messages with yahoo received
headers that do not match the search pattern defined in
check_for_forged_yahoo_received_headers(). I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 with
latest rules as per `sa-update` rule channels `sought.rules.yerp.org` and
Am 20.10.2014 um 14:18 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
SInce this is about mail and spam, I thought this might be a good place
to ask about nolisting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolisting
I get ~ 7000 messages/day on my server, with ~70% getting tagged as spam.
This is really private mailserver
On 10/20/2014 02:26 PM, Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm getting FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD false positives for messages with yahoo received
headers that do not match the search pattern defined in
check_for_forged_yahoo_received_headers(). I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 with
latest rules as per `sa-update`
On 10/20/2014 02:26 PM, Quinn Comendant wrote:
Full mail headers available athttps://cloudup.com/cbmG8tJF71k
Pls put on pastebin - cloudup timesout
Am 20.10.2014 um 14:51 schrieb Axb:
On 10/20/2014 02:26 PM, Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm getting FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD false positives for messages with yahoo
received headers that do not match the search pattern defined in
check_for_forged_yahoo_received_headers(). I'm using SpamAssassin
3.3.2 with
On 10/20/2014 02:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.10.2014 um 14:51 schrieb Axb:
On 10/20/2014 02:26 PM, Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm getting FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD false positives for messages with yahoo
received headers that do not match the search pattern defined in
Am 20.10.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Axb:
On 10/20/2014 02:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
seems your recursor couldn't resolve it, so your MTA added unknown...
works for me:
Received: from nm46-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
(nm46-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.203])
what happens in
On 10/20/2014 04:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.10.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Axb:
On 10/20/2014 02:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
seems your recursor couldn't resolve it, so your MTA added unknown...
works for me:
Received: from nm46-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
here are the RBLs I am using:
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
is there a way to block *.eu and *.link ?
here is part of local.cf
# Set the threshold at which a message is considered spam (default:
On 10/20/2014 04:48 PM, motty cruz wrote:
here are the RBLs I am using:
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
is there a way to block *.eu and *.link ?
block means *reject*, right?
use Postfix access
Am 20.10.2014 um 16:43 schrieb Axb:
On 10/20/2014 04:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.10.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Axb:
On 10/20/2014 02:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
seems your recursor couldn't resolve it, so your MTA added unknown...
Received: from nm46-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Hello Axb,
yes you're right I am trying to reject emails that end with *.eu and
*.link. can I do a wild card *.eu? *.link?
Thanks,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/2014 04:48 PM, motty cruz wrote:
here are the RBLs I am using:
reject_rbl_client
Am 20.10.2014 um 17:00 schrieb motty cruz:
yes you're right I am trying to reject emails that end with *.eu and
*.link. can I do a wild card *.eu? *.link?
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/regexp_table.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/pcre_table.5.html
On Mon, Oct
Le 20/10/2014 17:03, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 20.10.2014 um 17:00 schrieb motty cruz:
yes you're right I am trying to reject emails that end with *.eu and
*.link. can I do a wild card *.eu? *.link?
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/regexp_table.5.html
Am 20.10.2014 um 17:17 schrieb John Wilcock:
Le 20/10/2014 17:03, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 20.10.2014 um 17:00 schrieb motty cruz:
yes you're right I am trying to reject emails that end with *.eu and
*.link. can I do a wild card *.eu? *.link?
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:04:11 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
a perfect trained bayes on the inbound spamfirewall
* after recently a account was hacked and sent spam
(luckily not massive by rate-limits) which would have
been clearly caught by SA/spamass-milter i consider
to
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm getting FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD false positives for messages with yahoo received
headers that do not match the search pattern defined in
check_for_forged_yahoo_received_headers(). I'm using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 with
latest rules as per `sa-update` rule
Am 20.10.2014 um 18:03 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:04:11 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
a perfect trained bayes on the inbound spamfirewall
* after recently a account was hacked and sent spam
(luckily not massive by rate-limits) which would have
been clearly caught by
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:39:57 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 17.10.14 10:08, jdebert wrote:
Will URIBL_BLOCKED cause [SPAM] to be inserted into Subject?
no, it will more likely cause [SPAM] _not_ to be inserted, because it
wouldn't be detected.
Good. Had me worried
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:18:51 -0400
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
SInce this is about mail and spam, I thought this might be a good
place to ask about nolisting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolisting
I get ~ 7000 messages/day on my server, with ~70% getting tagged as
spam.
On 10/20/14, 9:46 AM, jdebert wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:39:57 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 17.10.14 10:08, jdebert wrote:
Will URIBL_BLOCKED cause [SPAM] to be inserted into Subject?
no, it will more likely cause [SPAM] _not_ to be inserted, because it
The complete error shown in my syslog is:
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53
failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: bad dns reply: Connection
refused
Up until this time I saw no issues. Running SA 3.4.0 on
On Oct 17, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Michael Opdenacker
michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On 09/01/2014 01:39 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On 31 Aug 2014, at 14:38 , Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote:
Doesn't ok_languages and ok_locales do the job? It does for me.
Not with UTF-8 encoding, that
Am 20.10.2014 um 20:06 schrieb Chris:
The complete error shown in my syslog is:
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53
failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: bad dns reply: Connection
refused
looks like
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 13:06 -0500, Chris wrote:
The complete error shown in my syslog is:
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53
failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: bad dns reply: Connection
refused
On 10/20/2014 2:06 PM, Chris wrote:
The complete error shown in my syslog is:
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53
failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: bad dns reply: Connection
refused
Up until this time
On 10/20/2014 2:06 PM, Chris wrote:
The complete error shown in my syslog is:
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53
failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives
Oct 20 11:41:44 localhost spamd[2155]: dns: bad dns reply: Connection
refused
Up until this time
Am 20.10.2014 um 20:09 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
I don’t understand why Apple’s Mail.app, for instance,
defaults to Win-1252 here in the US. That’s braindead
well, ask the Firefox developers why they use to
say charset is windows-1252 in recent releases
while in fact the http-headers as
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
SInce this is about mail and spam, I thought this might be a good place to
ask about nolisting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolisting
I get ~ 7000 messages/day on my server, with ~70% getting tagged as spam.
On 2014-10-20 05:18, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
SInce this is about mail and spam, I thought this might be a good
place to ask about nolisting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolisting
I get ~ 7000 messages/day on my server, with ~70% getting tagged as spam.
I did some experimentation a few
On October 20, 2014 4:48:51 PM motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote:
here are the RBLs I am using:
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
is there a way to block *.eu and *.link ?
Would you listen to my
On October 20, 2014 4:51:35 PM Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
use Postfix access tables (hash/pcre/regex)
If he reject he will not listen to what he ask for, pointless
Hello Benny,
I tried to find a legitimate way to reject or drop spam email. I was
getting tons of very spammy emails, with very low score. I take very
serious your advise and suggestions. I joined this forum because I want to
listen to experts.
going through the configuration files I realize I
2014-10-20 20:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
[...]
sorry, no, but what i face repeatly are messages like below
in fact only if the machine has more than 1 dns in resolv.conf
configure it to just use 127.0.0.1 and that won't happen
Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: no callback for id
38 matches
Mail list logo
