So apparently on my system—qmail as per qmailtoaster.com—it is by design not to
include the rDNS hostname in the Received: … header. See my discussion on the
QMT list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg38313.html.
So that degrades SA performance huh?
At least
On 10/22/2014 03:29 AM, Alex Regan wrote:
I have the database in a replicated mysql database for now. I'd like to
go to redis, but it's not quite ready for distributed configurations,
correct?
What do you mean by distributed configurations?
- many clients querying a central Redis DB?
- real
uriAXB_URI_MLW_DROPBOX/\/dropbox\/doc\.php$/
score AXB_URI_MLW_DROPBOX25.0
this rule will probably loose it's teeth pretty fast
enjoy
Chris,
Ran some spam and ham through 'spamassassin -D -t' today mainly looking
to see if there were any mention of dns issues as I had reported
earlier. At the end of the run I see this whether it's ham or spam:
Oct 21 19:30:09.086 [31076] dbg: check: tagrun - tag DKIMDOMAIN is
still
On 21.10.14 21:29, Alex Regan wrote:
I'm having some trouble with my bayes database, and thought it would
be a good time to just rebuild it. I'm wondering if anyone has any
good suggestions for the type of mail that should be used for
training.
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible.
On October 22, 2014 1:08:45 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
wrote:
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam from your
old account, it may start to classify ALL mail forwarded through that
This only correct if internal networks and or trusted networks is
Am 22.10.2014 um 13:15 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On October 22, 2014 1:08:45 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam
from your
old account, it may start to classify ALL mail forwarded through that
This only correct if internal networks and
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam from your
old account, it may start to classify ALL mail forwarded through that
On 22.10.14 13:15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This only correct if internal networks and or trusted networks is not
configured correct
oh, does BAYES
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:30:44 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam
from your old account, it may start to classify ALL mail forwarded
through that
On 22.10.14 13:15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This only correct if internal
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Sorry, yes bayes can be ignore all headers if one dont like it to track
origin senders or ips
Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Sorry, yes bayes can be ignore all headers if one dont like it to
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Sorry, yes bayes can be ignore all headers if one dont like it to
On October 22, 2014 3:05:56 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
wrote:
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:44:24 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On October 22, 2014 1:30:44 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
oh, does BAYES take care about these?
we are still talking about manually feeding BAYES, aren't we?
Am 22.10.2014 um 11:47 schrieb Axb:
uriAXB_URI_MLW_DROPBOX/\/dropbox\/doc\.php$/
score AXB_URI_MLW_DROPBOX25.0
this rule will probably loose it's teeth pretty fast
thanks, the same applies to googlebox
uri RH_URI_MLW_GOOGLEBOX1 /\/googlebox\/document\.php$/
score
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 12:25 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Chris,
Ran some spam and ham through 'spamassassin -D -t' today mainly looking
to see if there were any mention of dns issues as I had reported
earlier. At the end of the run I see this whether it's ham or spam:
Oct 21
As most have probably noticed, the SOUGHT rules are not being publish/
updated anymore. (you can shutdown your updates)
The reasons for this are beyond this msg.
An option was to run such a project under the Apache umbrella but it
makes it a VERY complicated process.
Thanks to Justin Mason
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 12:25 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Chris,
Ran some spam and ham through 'spamassassin -D -t' today mainly looking
to see if there were any mention of dns issues as I had reported
earlier. At the end of the run I see this whether it's ham or spam:
Oct 21
Chris,
Mark, now I'm confused. As you can see the 'action 0 .' takes place
before the DKIM lookup
Oct 22 09:16:14.220 [8459] dbg: check: tagrun - action 0 blocking on
tags DKIMDOMAIN
Yes, that's normal. It happens immediately after basic information
has been extracted from a mail header
Hi,
I'm having some trouble with my bayes database, and thought it would
be a good time to just rebuild it. I'm wondering if anyone has any
good suggestions for the type of mail that should be used for training.
be careful about forwarded mail, if possible. if you get many spam from
your
old
I noticed URLs from the TLD .link aren't properly classified on my mail
server. I wrote a simple URI rule to recognize that TLD which never
matched. I wrote a similar body rule, which did properly match.
Interestingly, I do see DNS queries going out for the URLs in question.
This is sa
On 10/22/2014 2:40 PM, Jesse Stroik wrote:
I noticed URLs from the TLD .link aren't properly classified on my
mail server. I wrote a simple URI rule to recognize that TLD which
never matched. I wrote a similar body rule, which did properly match.
Interestingly, I do see DNS queries going out
You can try replacing your RegistrarBoundaries.pm file with the one from
trunk. It should be kept up-to-date with the latest TLD craze. As far as I
know, it hasn't been tested with 3.2.2 but should work nonetheless.
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 13:40 -0500, Jesse Stroik wrote:
I noticed URLs from the TLD .link aren't properly classified on my mail
server. I wrote a simple URI rule to recognize that TLD which never
matched. I wrote a similar body rule, which did properly match.
Interestingly, I do see DNS
I am seeing duplicate emails when saved off into my Maildirs. My normal mail
application ignores these duplicates, but iOS 8 does not, so I need to figure
out what's going on.
1412808979.M904650P22299.mail.covisp.net,S=65189,W=66526:2,S
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
I am seeing duplicate emails when saved off into my Maildirs. My normal
mail application ignores these duplicates, but iOS 8 does not, so I need
to figure out what's going on.
1412808979.M904650P22299.mail.covisp.net,S=65189,W=66526:2,S
On 22 Oct 2014, at 19:38 , John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
I am seeing duplicate emails when saved off into my Maildirs. My normal mail
application ignores these duplicates, but iOS 8 does not, so I need to
figure out what's going on.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
Thanks, the questions help me focus on what is really happening.
Happy to help.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
On 22 Oct 2014, at 20:39 , John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote:
Thanks, the questions help me focus on what is really happening.
Happy to help.
Aha. It was procmail. but it was /usr/local/etc/procmailrc
:0c
/backups/imap.backups
if that FAILS, the
29 matches
Mail list logo
