On 11/04/2014 02:31 AM, David Jones wrote:
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 4:01 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hacked sites: dropbox/googlebox/banking
Am 03.11.2014 um 22:55 schrieb John
hello-
i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be
identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while
the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe the
headers and content of the two messages to be identical. i can see
On 11/4/2014 11:33 AM, btb wrote:
i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be
identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while
the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe
the headers and content of the two messages to be
On 11/4/2014 11:33 AM, btb wrote:
hello-
i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be
identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while
the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe
the headers and content of the two messages
2014-06-03 09:43, Christian Laußat wrote:
I'm trying to improve my rules for DMARC policy checking. For now I
only use the Authentication-Results header from the OpenDMARC milter
as described here:
https://kvm.laussat.info/2014/05/19/using-dmarc-in-spamassassin/
To get ride of this dependency,
On 2014.11.04 11.37, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I didn't look at the emails but most of these appear to be reactive
network-based tests like RBL and Razor/Pyzor. It would make complete
sense that it might slip by and then be caught in the future.
On 2014.11.04 12.00, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Since
Hello, I would like to set BAYES_999=0.2 score higher than 0.2; I searching
for file but I can't find it in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin (am using
FreeBSD)
Thanks for your support,
Motty
Am 04.11.2014 um 19:39 schrieb motty cruz:
Hello, I would like to set BAYES_999=0.2 score higher than 0.2; I
searching for file but I can't find it in
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin (am using FreeBSD)
local.cf or any other file ending with .cf there
that applies for *all* rules and scores
Everyone,
We're having problems with auto learning on v3.4.0 that we aren't
having on v.3.3.2. The number of spam e-mails being auto-learned has
dropped significantly, and the amount of spam being let through (false
negatives) is higher as well.
For reference, here is a snippet from
--As of November 4, 2014 10:39:56 AM -0800, motty cruz is alleged to have
said:
Hello, I would like to set BAYES_999=0.2 score higher than 0.2; I
searching for file but I can't find it in
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin (am using FreeBSD)
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Another poster
I get spam where the subject and beginning of the body is clearly spam,
but then at the end there is a paragraph or two of text taken from a
news article, stackoverflow technical text, etc. The total bayes score
for messages like these is often fairly neutral.
Is there a way to weight bayesian
11 matches
Mail list logo
