listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
i was testing with a sample message, and noticed that when running
manually with --debug, there seem to be numerous differences in the
results, such as scores for the same tests differing, visual ordering
of results differing [is this significant?], and
On 12/2/2014 10:59 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/12/2014 12:10, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Likely in antique versions of debian and Redhat (which again will
have bigger issues), there surely must come a time when the line is
drawn and say - you're unsupported from this_date, give them plenty
of
I am really boggled by people wanting to run LTS versions of code with
old versions of tools and expecting to run newer versions of other
things.
More constructively, it's perfectly possible to build newer perl in a
different prefix. Just because there's an old perl in the base system
doesn't
Am 03.12.2014 um 15:28 schrieb Greg Troxel:
I am really boggled by people wanting to run LTS versions of code with
old versions of tools and expecting to run newer versions of other
things.
More constructively, it's perfectly possible to build newer perl in a
different prefix. Just because
On 12/2/2014 8:49 PM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
I've got a Postfix/Amavis/Spamassassin/Clamav setup running on an fc20
machine. It's all working except for the SA part, which is working
that is it tags messages as spam or in my case not spam I see the
headers.
The problem is I'm using a
It would be very rare, and if so you would ever more rare CC the
entire list of addresses on your spam message - sure this was a lot more
common in years gone by, but I've not seen any such evidence of it in
almost 10 years, and if you did, well, that's not my problem, its the
problem of your
It would be very rare, and if so you would ever more rare CC the entire
list of addresses on your spam message
Really? I see it all the time, often with a message body of TAKE ME OFF
THIS LIST (because four exclamation points will convince a spammer to
stop, while three just amuse the
What I haven't noticed anyone else mention is that I was getting that
error message even though the perl on my Ubuntu 14.04 system is 5.18.2.
--
Jim Clausing
GIAC GSE #26, GREM-Gold, CISSP
GPG fingerprint = 4780 13A4 F33E BF4E AE86 0D64 0EFD B3E3 03BF 407A
On or about Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Noel
