On 21. dec. 2014 23.41.21 Almond almond27...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote this post on CentOS forum
Suggest using tmpwatch in /tmp, the above is not mailqouta
du -lh
this was the situation on /tmp before tmpwatch installation:
[root@myhostname ~]# du -lh /tmp
4.0K /tmp/.Test-unix
4.0K /tmp/.ICE-unix
4.0K/tmp/systemd-private-U6z6hx/tmp
8.0K/tmp/systemd-private-U6z6hx
20K /tmp/mywww/blog/wp-content/uploads/wpcf7_captcha
24K
Almond skrev den 2014-12-22 13:43:
this was the situation on /tmp before tmpwatch installation:
[root@myhostname ~]# du -lh /tmp
11M /tmp/systemd-private-jr1YKi/tmp
11M /tmp/systemd-private-jr1YKi
is this 11M mail ?
[root@myhostname ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail
Almond wrote:
3) ...spamd[28040]: plugin: eval failed: error writing to
/tmp/.spamassassin28040V31F7ftmp:
Disk quota exceeded at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm
line 965, GEN840 line 1575.
this was the situation on /tmp before tmpwatch installation:
hi Mark,
do you mean this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs
but tmpfs have no quota... as you can read on that page, i'm confused...
so, that's done by default on CentOS ?
indeed, I didn't see any tmpfs on CentOS 6, as I remember...but I could
be wrong.
Do you think that if
Am 22.12.2014 um 17:04 schrieb Almond:
do you mean this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs
but tmpfs have no quota... as you can read on that page, i'm confused...
so, that's done by default on CentOS ?
indeed, I didn't see any tmpfs on CentOS 6, as I remember...but I could
Hi Reindl and all of you,
[root@myhostname ~]# df -hT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 ext4 1.8T 37G 1.7T 3% /
devtmpfs devtmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs
check bash profile, and or systemmd that change how and where temp
files are stored, is dovecot started via systemmd ?
export | grep tmp
[root@myhostname ~]# export | grep tmp
declare -x PWD=/tmp
what is the homedir of user running this ?
/home/username/
possible you have set spamd /
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Almond wrote:
hi Mark,
do you mean this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs
but tmpfs have no quota... as you can read on that page, i'm confused...
so, that's done by default on CentOS ?
indeed, I didn't see any tmpfs on CentOS 6, as I remember...but I
Hi David,
so you mean to move the /tmp partition from /dev/md2 to another
partition, since /var/spool/mail and quota control are on the same
partition?
and what size to reserve to the new /tmp... ?
thank you
On 22/12/2014 18:46, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Almond wrote:
hi
Am 22.12.2014 um 19:08 schrieb Almond:
so you mean to move the /tmp partition from /dev/md2 to another
partition, since /var/spool/mail and quota control are on the same
partition?
and what size to reserve to the new /tmp... ?
well, we have it on tmpfs like below on our inbound mail-gw and
Yes, that's exactly what you need to do.
As your system already has tmpfs type partitions for things such as '/run'
just set up a new config for '/tmp' which is modeled on the config for '/run'.
As to the size, that will depend upon your system activity and configuration.
I'd try starting with
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.12.2014 um 19:08 schrieb Almond:
so you mean to move the /tmp partition from /dev/md2 to another
partition, since /var/spool/mail and quota control are on the same
partition?
and what size to reserve to the new /tmp... ?
well, we have it on
Am 22.12.2014 um 19:32 schrieb David B Funk:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, we have it on tmpfs like below on our inbound mail-gw and use in
any SA/ClamAV related service (milters and so on) explicit
Environment=TMPDIR=/tmp to make sure even /var/tmp is not used
also
Hi, last questions please.
let me understand better.
tmpfs is not RAM but HD?
those
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 33M 16G 1% /run
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 33M 16G
Am 22.12.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Almond:
Hi, last questions please.
let me understand better.
tmpfs is not RAM but HD?
tmpfs = RAM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tmpfs
those
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 33M 16G 1% /run
tmpfs
On 22. dec. 2014 19.45.42 Almond almond27...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, last questions please.
Please dont
let me understand better.
tmpfs is not RAM but HD?
Tmpfs is a filesystem, ramdisk is /dev/shm
those
tmpfs tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 16G
Hi all,
I suspect at least one of my customers has been hit with CryptoWall 2.0,
and wondered if anyone had any experience with it, and understand the
level of protection the latest SA provides?
What can I look for either in the mail logs or actual email archives as
an indication of
SA offers no protection whatsoever for CryptoWall or any other similar malware.
ClamAV is the tool for that if you want free. SA is only a classifier. The
user's setup or that of the ISP using SA uses that classification to pigeonhole
spam. To the extent that CryptoWall comes in a message that
On 23/12/2014 12:00, jdow wrote:
And ClamAV is better than nothing. Safe browsing is more pertinent. Dual AV
programs also help, but slow the machine down dramatically. Some of the newer
tools that use other levels of analysis from typical AV tools can also
materially help.
I wouldn't
On 2014-12-22 19:38, Noel Butler wrote:
On 23/12/2014 12:00, jdow wrote:
And ClamAV is better than nothing. Safe browsing is more pertinent. Dual AV
programs also help, but slow the machine down dramatically. Some of the newer
tools that use other levels of analysis from typical AV tools can
21 matches
Mail list logo
