Recommendations for mail with only an image

Hi, Apparently our users use email quite a bit to share pictures. These emails typically contain no subject and no body, just the image. This hits all sorts of rules (perhaps correctly), and was just looking for input on how it should be handled. There are a few rules that seem to overlap in

Re: Live upgrade safe?

On 9/15/15, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.09.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Nick Edwards: >> On 9/15/15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 12.09.15 15:27, Reindl Harald wrote: >> and no, i am not the package maintainer but the first person who

SA Ignoring Config In LOCAL_RULES_DIR

Hello, and thank you in advanced for looking into the below, I've been pondering over this issue for the past number of days, and don't feel I'm getting anywhere now. I am a system administrator and have been using a Exim/ClamAV/SpamAssassin setup for around 8 years, over which time I had felt

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Hi. If you don't want change DNS resolver for all DNS queries from your server you can add in SA config line: dns_server x.y.z.k:53 where z.y.z.k is IP DNS server using to resolve only by SA. Then in resolv.conf you can use different (ex. ISP) DNS server. More info:

Re: [Announce] SA-Plugins: RedisAWL, RuleTimingRedis

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:41 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2015-06-09 17:57 +0200, Benning, Markus wrote: > > > RuleTimingRedis - collect SA rule timings in redis > > I'm trying this out. I have a little annoying problem: the logs > beginning on line 178 seem to go to stdout or stderr as well

Re: New warnings after Perl upgrade to 5.20?

Larry Rosenman wrote: Getting the following on sa-learn: each on reference is experimental at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URILocalBL.pm line 353. keys on reference is experimental at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URILocalBL.pm

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

On 9/15/2015 6:51 AM, Marc Richter wrote: Hi everyone, I recently read the following in all my filtered Mail: 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. So I read what's

Re: SA Ignoring Config In LOCAL_RULES_DIR

On 9/15/2015 3:55 AM, Nathan wrote: What I am finding is any config saved in the "/etc/mail/spamassassin/" folder is loaded during a "spamassassin --lint -D" but ignored during operations. For example I have a "addresses.cf" file for whitelist_to & from as well as blacklisted_to & from and

URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Hi everyone, I recently read the following in all my filtered Mail: 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. So I read what's written there and setup a local DNS server, as

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

On 09/15/2015 12:51 PM, Marc Richter wrote: Hi everyone, I recently read the following in all my filtered Mail: 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. So I read what's

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Yes Am 15.09.2015 um 13:30 schrieb Axb: On 09/15/2015 01:23 PM, Marc Richter wrote: Also, you shouldn't make assumptions without measuring something: 1. without forwarding: ;; Query time: 543 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) 2. with forwarding to my ISP's servers: ;; Query time: 2

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Marc Richter skrev den 2015-09-15 13:23: That's 271 times faster than root-servers's lookup. hmm maybe your server is heavy loaded of spam ?, and your isp is not ? lets check this so: dig +trace uribl.com show me how it is for you note +trace do not care of forwards at all what version

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Marc Richter skrev den 2015-09-15 12:51: But even the IP of my server was sending just 2 requests for incomming spam since I have integrated BIND, these messages contain this ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE also. How can I hit the free usage limit by just 2 requests?

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Hey Reindl, if you are trying to insult people at all costs, you should read and understand their posts in full before doing so at least, to not look like a jackass additional to an impolite person. What I wrote is: >> ... but created the exemptions as listed at the very bottom of that >>

Re: [Announce] SA-Plugins: RedisAWL, RuleTimingRedis

On 2015-06-09 17:57 +0200, Benning, Markus wrote: > RuleTimingRedis - collect SA rule timings in redis I'm trying this out. I have a little annoying problem: the logs beginning on line 178 seem to go to stdout or stderr as well as syslog. The result is that cron sends me email every time spamd

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Am 15.09.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Marc Richter: I recently read the following in all my filtered Mail: 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. So I read what's written there

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

On 09/15/2015 01:23 PM, Marc Richter wrote: Also, you shouldn't make assumptions without measuring something: 1. without forwarding: ;; Query time: 543 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) 2. with forwarding to my ISP's servers: ;; Query time: 2 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

Am 15.09.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Marc Richter: if you are trying to insult people at all costs really? you would recognize it when i intend to do so *any* expierienced mailadmin out there has a local recursion nameserver on his MTA or at least somewhere in his LAN to use a central local

New warnings after Perl upgrade to 5.20?

Getting the following on sa-learn: each on reference is experimental at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URILocalBL.pm line 353. keys on reference is experimental at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URILocalBL.pm line 377. keys on reference is

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

However you did not empty your ISP's dns server cache. That 2 msec response time is from his cache, the 543 msec for your server is when it's not in your server's cache. So you're not making a fair comparison. A response from a cache is always going to be faster, that's why people use caching