On 11/20/2015 1:06 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
So my only other question is: does the "-u" option to spamc *only*
control the user that the spamc process runs as? Or does it interact
with the --virtual-user-config spamd option in any other way?
spamc's "-u" option passes the
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:31:01 -0500
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 1:06 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> > So my only other question is: does the "-u" option to spamc *only*
> > control the user that the spamc process runs as? Or does it interact
> > with the --virtual-user-config spamd option in
I set selinux to permissive and the same error persists. So we can rule out
selinux.
clamdscan -c /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf eicar.txt
/home/dan/eicar.txt: lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 0
Total errors: 1
Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s)
Also
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
What user is clamd running as because why would it have access to /home/dan?
Overall you appear to have a basic clamd functionality issue.
If it *is* a problem with clamd functionality, I'd suggest there's still a
bug in SA. It should not be
What user is clamd running as because why would it have access to /home/dan?
Overall you appear to have a basic clamd functionality issue.
Regards,
KAM
On November 20, 2015 8:08:55 PM EST, dans wrote:
>I set selinux to permissive and the same error persists. So we can
>rule
clamdscan -c /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf eicar.txt
/home/dan/eicar.txt: lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR
It looks to be related to clamdscan performing a chroot() and the files
you're referencing not being available from within that chroot. Try
passing the --stream option.
-bash-4.3$