Re: Scoring Issues

On 26 Jan 2018, at 17:47 (-0500), Computer Bob wrote: My understanding is that spamassassin is configured for razor and uribl. amavisd-new is configured to call spamassassin so is spamassassin not doing the sub calls ? Not exactly. The command-line 'spamassassin' script is written in Perl

Re: Unchecked ??? [Was: Can't locate object method "trim_domain"]

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Ian Zimmerman wrote: What is this ***UNCHECKED*** goo in the subjects? Has someone played with the list manager configuration? That was probably a side effect of the ClamAV problem, that has been fixed. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

Unchecked ??? [Was: Can't locate object method "trim_domain"]

What is this ***UNCHECKED*** goo in the subjects? Has someone played with the list manager configuration? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the

Re: Scoring Issues

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote: Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on     M1-2.dettenwanger.inter-control.com X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level:

Re: From name containing a spoofed email address

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 16:26 -0600, sha...@shanew.net wrote: > Just a hunch, but did you make sure to add the "$self->register..." > line inside the "sub new {" block with all the others in > HeaderEval.pm? > Yep, sure did, thanks for that. All is well now. > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Chris wrote:

Re: Scoring Issues

My understanding is that spamassassin is configured for razor and uribl. amavisd-new is configured to call spamassassin so is spamassassin not doing the sub calls ? I see no docs on configuring razor directly in amavis. If you could tell me what to look for it would be appreciated. On 1/26/18

Re: Scoring Issues

Ok, I will look now, what am I looking for ? On 1/26/18 4:20 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote: Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on     M1-2.dettenwanger.inter-control.com

Re: Scoring Issues

I did not think so, but will check another day. 15 hours is enough for today. On 1/26/18 4:20 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote: Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on    

Re: From name containing a spoofed email address

Just a hunch, but did you make sure to add the "$self->register..." line inside the "sub new {" block with all the others in HeaderEval.pm? On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Chris wrote: On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 10:05 -0500, Rupert Gallagher wrote: This is my current solution for a problem that has been

Re: Scoring Issues

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, b...@inter-control.com wrote: Oh, here is the X-SPAM status from the command line: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on     M1-2.dettenwanger.inter-control.com X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=23.0

Re: From name containing a spoofed email address

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 10:05 -0500, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > This is my current solution for a problem that has been discussed > many times in this list.  > I wrote it last year, and it serves me well. Feel free to use it, if > you find it useful.  > > This part goes into your local.cf: > >

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Can't locate object method "trim_domain"

On 01/26/18 19:06, Dave Wreski wrote: > Hi, while learning an mbox on a recent 3.4.2 svn: > > # sa-learn --spam --progress --mbox junk-012618 >  28% [==   >   ] 5.53 msgs/sec 00m44s LEFTUse of >

Re: Scoring Issues

On 01/26/2018 02:39 PM, b...@inter-control.com wrote: Greetings to all, I have an issue with my setup somehow and it may be in amavis-new, most spam gets detected and delt with, some gets through and the scoring seems odd. The headers that get through are usually along the lines of:

Scoring Issues

Greetings to all, I have an issue with my setup somehow and it may be in amavis-new, most spam gets detected and delt with, some gets through and the scoring seems odd. The headers that get through are usually along the lines of: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level:

Re: New idea for stopping spam

On 01/26/2018 01:49 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Hi All, OK I've been doing some sociological analysis of the spam I've been getting on my honeypot, Bays feeder email boxes (dangerous, I know) and I've come up with what I think MIGHT be a way to fight spam that I wanted to run up the flagpole.

Re: New idea for stopping spam

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:49:07 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: [snip] > Do you think this approach might work? Not any better than Bayes. All your "spam archetype" examples are already easy to stop; we whack them all handily with Bayes. The annoying ones are more like: Subject:

New idea for stopping spam

Hi All, OK I've been doing some sociological analysis of the spam I've been getting on my honeypot, Bays feeder email boxes (dangerous, I know) and I've come up with what I think MIGHT be a way to fight spam that I wanted to run up the flagpole. We all know ONE basic thing about spam:

***UNCHECKED*** TEST TEST

*TEST message per moderator.*

***UNCHECKED*** Can't locate object method "trim_domain"

Hi, while learning an mbox on a recent 3.4.2 svn: # sa-learn --spam --progress --mbox junk-012618 28% [== ] 5.53 msgs/sec 00m44s LEFTUse of uninitialized value in lc at