On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 21:20:49 +0200
Yves Goergen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've received a notification e-mail from stackexchange.com
> (stackoverflow.com) with a high spam score. It has this line in its
> report:
>
>5.7 URIBL_BLACKContains an URL listed in the URIBL
> blacklist
5.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: stackexchange.com]
I guess that's not supposed to be like that. I can't change anything at
it, just for information for somebody in the position to fix that.
It is indeed
Hello,
I've received a notification e-mail from stackexchange.com
(stackoverflow.com) with a high spam score. It has this line in its report:
5.7 URIBL_BLACKContains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: stackexchange.com]
I guess that's not
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:12:42 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 28.07.18 17:06, RW wrote:
> >I don't see anything on the site to suggest that it avoids listing
> >dynamic IP addresses. And here:
> >
> > https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/357.html
> >
> >commenting on listing history
On 28.07.18 17:06, RW wrote:
I don't see anything on the site to suggest that it avoids listing
dynamic IP addresses. And here:
https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/357.html
commenting on listing history it says:
"One also has to remember that IP addresses change hands. Many ISPs
I don't see anything on the site to suggest that it avoids listing
dynamic IP addresses. And here:
https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/357.html
commenting on listing history it says:
"One also has to remember that IP addresses change hands. Many ISPs
assign IP addresses to
