On 4/5/2017 11:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
* when you subscribe you get a welcome message
* that message explains it and says "keep me stored"
* HOW did you subscribe? the same way you unsubscribe
And if I subscribed 2 years ago, do you honestly think I remember how I
subscribed?
* every
True that, but it's not entirely obvious how to view the message headers in
many of today's mail clients. Of course, if you're on this list, you'd think
you'd understand where to find them...
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017
Why not just add the blocked email address to the blocked sender list
for your Hotmail account?
On 7/30/2015 12:28 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:21:35 -0500
Al B wrote:
I have 2 accounts:
myaccount@gmail.commyacco...@hotmail.com
I've been using Spamassassin with both accounts and all
I use NameCheap for my own domain registrations and recommend it to
others, so I can guarantee that at least my family's email isn't spam...
Bret Miller
Manager, Information Technology
Grace Communion International
Email: bret.mil...@gci.org mailto:bret.mil...@gci.org
Phone: (626) 650-2343
On 11/14/2011 12:23 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 11/14/2011 3:07 PM, Mike Koleszar wrote:
Hi all, I would like to put together a script that will show me the spam
score of emails that come in. I was hoping that someone could help push
me in the right direction to do this. I'm hoping there is a
You could say
header __LOCAL_MAILENGINE ALL =~ /mailengine.+\.com/i
to match anything between mailengine and .com.
Bret Miller
Manager, Information Technology
Grace Communion International
On 10/21/2011 9:13 AM, R - elists wrote:
There are a couple of ways to do it.
If you know
Well, I don't actually subscribe to any active techtarget lists, but I
do still get marketing garbage from them. Got one on the 19th that
looked fine here.
Bret
On 7/22/2011 8:50 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
any of you subscribed to techtarget or crm emails?
seems on june 16th or 17th,
(Sorry about the top post...)
One of the big issues with RBL services like this is the rules that use
them change over time. We quite nicely fit into free use, but I realize
that there are many others who do not. It might be a good enhancement
to SA to be able to make a way to disable all
On 4/20/2010 8:10 AM, John Rudd wrote:
Are you the ISP for the IP address, or the client/user?
According to SORBS, requests for removal from the DUHL should come
from the ISP that owns the IP space, not the end user that rents it.
See: http://www.au.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml
End users (non ISP
On 4/20/2010 9:05 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tir 20 apr 2010 18:00:23 CEST, Bret Miller wrote
them as an organization. You need your email to be delivered reliably
to everyone on the internet and that's the only way it's going to
happen.
not correct, hotmail gmail yahoo works without isp
On 4/20/2010 3:09 PM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
Hi all.
I noticed Spamhaus made available a new URIBL. I updated my SA package
(debian testing) to the latest version and I wanted to implement check on
the DBL list too.
How do I configure spamassassin to do that?
Thanks,
-JK
Get SA 3.3.1. Run
I didn't try to make spamc with mine. If
you're doing that, it is possible that there could be a configuration
situation that prevents it. I'm not sure why else it would fail. For
the few items I had to manually compile and install I used Visual
Studio 2008 Express.
Bret
On 3/22/2010 10:40
On 3/19/2010 5:25 AM, weirdbeardmt wrote:
I'm trying to install SA 3.30 on W2k8 64-bit. I have ActivePerl 5.10.1 with
dmake 4.12 (since nmake won't run on 64-bit). I am quite new to this so
sorry if I'm asking something stupidly obvious.
I've installed Net-DNS, IP-Country, Mail-SPF, Error,
You might try running ppm insteractively.
Perhaps Win32-Registry-File is already installed, or ppm is unable to
load the package database from ActiveState?
I know both those packages exist because I have them installed on
ActivePerl 5.8.8.820.
Bret
On 2/15/2009 5:42 AM, Jim wrote:
I'm
On 1/15/2009 1:36 AM, Rasmus Haslund wrote:
SM wrote:
"Botnet Plugin" sounds like a plugin that detect botnets ... If
Rasmus is finding that many false ositives, then he's using the wrong tools.
Well I am not using the botnet plugin because i am not sure how to
implement
No... I'd say if it's working for you, then no worries. I'll have to try
installing it again when I have a chance. Perhaps it matters what kind
of compiler you use for installing too...
Bret
On 11/10/2008 6:04 AM, Dan Barker wrote:
I read it on the internet (so it has to be trueg) that
What are your experiences with SA on Windows Platform, since i am not
using it for now. Would you recommended it or are there too many caveats?
I have run SA on Windows for several years. Most built-in stuff works just
fine. With a couple small modifications, you can even store your bayes and
New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
Running fine here on Windows Server 2003 with CommuniGate Pro. :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Yesterday (at least that's when it was noticed), we started having timeout
issues with SpamAssassin again. My average scan time went from 8.5 seconds
last week and the week before to 20.5 seconds yesterday with many messages
(primarily ham) running near the 120 second range. What happened in
I'm trying to get received headers to parse correctly
because the ones from
CommuniGate Pro don't always. And, since I'm already
modifying the headers
in my connector due to the MTA not being able to do RDNS
without rejecting
based on it, I'm not aware that certain types of headers
I'm trying to get received headers to parse correctly because the ones from
CommuniGate Pro don't always. And, since I'm already modifying the headers
in my connector due to the MTA not being able to do RDNS without rejecting
based on it, I'm not aware that certain types of headers don't parse
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bret Miller wrote:
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bret Miller wrote:
Bret Miller wrote:
* 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam
* 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam
Is there a way of updating spamassassin automatically to adapt to new
ways of spamming.
For instance, when picture spam came I had to install
fuzzOCR, now with
PDF and RTF, new modules are required.
I also heard about rules-du-jour or something, do I always have to
manually compile, add and
I'm going to propose you another great idea which will
probably radically change the spam-detection technics.
No, come one: I'm just kitting. :) I think this idea could
eventually help in better detecting the kind of spam in which
some words are garbled in order to deceive their
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bret Miller wrote:
Bret Miller wrote:
* 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam
* 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam
* 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam
and nonspam
Before you look at this as just another blacklist - the real
power is in the white and yellow lists. First - an overview.
My list returns these codes:
* 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam
* 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam
* 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam
* 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam
* 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam
* 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam
and nonspam
* 127.0.0.4 - brownlist - all spam - but
not yet enough
to
Bret Miller wrote:
* 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam
* 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam
* 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam
and nonspam
* 127.0.0.4 - brownlist - all spam - but
not yet
I keep saying that I have false positives with botnet, but haven't
substantiated that to date. So, today I'm spending a little time making
exceptions since I would like this to work. Here are todays:
Americanpayroll.org, sent from IP 67.106.104.135, resolves to
67.106.106.135.ptr.us.xo.net #OK,
Bret Miller wrote:
Enews.webbuyersguide.com (part of Ziff-Davis Media), sent from IP
204.92.135.90, resolves to smtp22.enews.webbuyersguide.com
#not sure why
this got a BOTNET=1 flag, but it did. Also find hosts 92,
75, 70, 74, 93,
86, and others. All similarly resolve
At 12:36 21-08-2007, John Rudd wrote:
# nslookup www2mail.wordreference.com
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: www2mail.wordreference.com
Address: 75.126.29.11
baddns.
There's an authoritative answer for www2mail.wordreference.com.
# nslookup server.nch.com.au
Non-authoritative
Apparently I must be a spammer since I can't send e-mail to perkel.com...
At least this response has been delayed since 9:16 a.m. pacific time
yesterday. Oh well... Here's the response.
Bret
-Original Message-
From: Bret Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 9
I am running SA 3.1.7. I need to upgrade it. I have to stop
the current running SA. how to stop the service?
That really depends on how you are calling SA. I know you run it on Windows,
but what mail server, and how is it called. I use CommuniGate Pro with
CGPSA. To stop SA, I have to kill the
Hi, I have tried to install plugin in this mode:
- I have put .cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin
- I have put .pm file in /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8
Put it in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
- I have edit v310.pre and I have add the line:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::PDFInfo
Then try:
I ran across the script (pasted below, and watch wrapping) on
this list about a year ago or so. I use it to parse
attachments forwarded as attachments from MS Outlook. It
worked very well until I upgraded to SpamAssassin 3.2.1
I imagine they changed something in the way that the
find_parts
I'm starting to see a lot of AOL mail getting pushed into the
review folder (above 4.0 score) with the FORGED_AOL_TAGS rule
hitting, and apparently on real AOL e-mail. At least the
e-mails were SPF_PASS and received from an AOL server...
Add this to local.cf, all fixed:
score
I'm starting to see a lot of AOL mail getting pushed into the review
folder (above 4.0 score) with the FORGED_AOL_TAGS rule hitting, and
apparently on real AOL e-mail. At least the e-mails were SPF_PASS and
received from an AOL server...
Here are two examples:
Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful
in the Spam Wars?
You're in luck! I just installed them yesterday. Had been meaning to for
a while, but things have been too busy to get the script written to
update
Bret Miller wrote:
Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful
in the Spam Wars?
You're in luck! I just installed them yesterday. Had been
meaning to for
a while, but things have been too busy to get
OK, I don't use MySQL, but I do use SQL for Bayes and AWL. Here are my
settings (which are working currently in 3.2.1):
# auto_whitelist settings
auto_whitelist_factory Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
user_awl_dsn DBI:ODBC:Driver={SQL
Server};Server=MAIL;Database=sql-database
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 18:03 +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Can someone tell me for sure which way this needs to be
and how to get
sa-update to look at /usr/local/share/spamassassin again
if that is what
I need to do?
I'm using FreeBSD here
The subject says it. I installed 3.2.1 on Windows Server 2003 with
ActivePerl 5.8.8.820 yesterday. No problems since installing. Good job
as usual.
Bret
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:30:10AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Cans rules_du_jour work?
Still getting a no update state.
SARE is back up (knock on wood). Delete your .cf files and
re-run RDJ...
--
Dallas Engelken
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sg wrote:
hi
We are using MS Exchange 2003 server on windows 2003 server. We have
registered with domain service and using 50 mail users. We
are getting lot
of spam mails. I want to know the configuring details of
Mail-spamassassin-3.1.7 and how to control the spam mails..
I'd
i got a question , Domainkey is now unsupportet, Dkim is
supportet, and
Domainkey compat.
when i use this plugins with spamassassin, what are the main
differents
between using this plugin for checking sign on incoming
mails, and checking
it via a MTA (and domainkeys).
Normaly the Mta,
Hi!
Below the debug output of my sa-update -
what about this ('require' failed) lines -
do I have to install Perl modules to get this Spamassassin modules?
I don't see anything in the debut output that indicates that it failed.
The missing requires are all optional modules AFAIK, so it all
Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or
does it just fix
the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl 5.8.8 ?
You might try it and see if it helps with the performance.
Since it does
fix the UTF-8 issue it won't be doing as much logging and
grinding. let us know if it
Is there a standard perl version that the SA team aspires to
and uses as a baseline or some sort?
If so, is it the 5.8.8 or newer or ???
For running on Windows, 5.8.8 is highly recommended. 5.6.1 can work, but
it is rather unstable. Can't really comment on what runs best for other
Someone mentioned issues with config files in
/etc/mail/spamassassin in regards to the newer 3.2.0
I understand what you mentioned about what should be in .pre
files and .cf files
Did you find any other issues with just general alternatively
named .cf files or problems with them?
It's
Thanks for the info Bret. What I've come up with is this:
header _FROM_DOMAIN From ~= /example\.com/i
header _SPF_TRUE /\bSPF_FAIL\b/
meta DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE (_FROM_DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE)
score DOMAIN_SPF_TRUE 10.0
Will this work?
Kinda, with few changes:
I need to look at setting up a custom rule based on a SPF
result. If mail is sent from domain xyz.com and the SPF
record matches, let it pass as per normal. If on the other
hand the SPF record fails for xyz.com, add +5 to the score.
This has to happen ONLY for domain xyz.com. All others will
Is anyone noticing small, medium, or large improvements in
how well 3.2.0 does it's job compared to 3.1.8 ???
I'm seeing less spam slipping through in 3.2.0 rc3 than with 3.1.8. Of
course, that could be coincidental, but I'd rather attribute it to the
SA upgrade.
Bret
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:52:39PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - I did this with Exim rules but the same trick could be
used in SA.
I figured out a trick that catches 419 spam with amazing accuracy.
...
So - who uses one freemail address with a reply-to of another? 419
spammers. So
One of my users is supposed to get messages from this person, but they
often get marked as spam. So I want to whitelist, and I can use
whitelist_from, but I want to use whitelist_from_rcvd. BUT, it doesn't
work for me.
I said:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
Which I think means
One of my users is supposed to get messages from this person, but they
often get marked as spam. So I want to whitelist, and I can use
whitelist_from, but I want to use whitelist_from_rcvd. BUT, it doesn't
work for me.
I said:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
Which I think
Hi, list, I know this is one of those egg and chicken kind
of questions, but having now the possibility of checking the
impact of various setups, I was wondering if it is more
convenient to let the MTA perform the RBL checks, or disable
them and let SA do this job.
Currently I am using
the actual server it's receiving from. SA, in many cases, checks
farther back, so you may hit RBLs in SA that you wouldn't on your MTA.
I use zen.spamhaus.org and list.dsbl.org on the MTA.
Bret
Thanks
Bret Miller wrote:
Hi, list, I know this is one of those egg and
chicken kind
snip
Regarding sa-update, which channels are you using? I'm
currently running on saupdates.openproect.com. Any
suggestions on this subject?
I Use:
updates.spamassassin.org
00_FVGT_File001.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
99_FVGT_meta.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
How's this working out? Any good/bad reports?
Just installed, tested and deployed this today on CommuniGate Pro on
Windows 2003. So far, seems to be running well. Only time will tell if
it's better or worse than 3.1.8.
I actually managed to get DKIM support installed on Windows this time
Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
Like maybe no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx
Exit codes are not evident when simply typing sa-update on the command
line...
I created my own simple batch file for windows.
It runs sa-update.
Checks the
I'm having trouble figuring out why my whitelist_from_rcvd statement
doesn't work on this message.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.cems.wamu.com #Washington
Mutual Statements
Message Headers:
X-Spam-Tests: tests=AWL=0.427,BAYES_00=-2.599,DBL_12_LETTER_PGIMG=0.2,
Any issues installing SA on a Microsoft Small Business Server
with their Exchange version?
I can't think of any.
Any recommendations pros/cons will be appreciated.
Get the latest ActivePerl (5.8.8.820) and perl modules.
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/InstallingOnWindows
See
Kenneth Porter wrote:
I'm looking for an MTA I can install in an all-Windows
SOHO. Open source
and free preferable. Ideally with hooks for SpamAssassin.
(At home I
have a Linux box with sendmail, but a friend has no Linux
on his LAN.)
Free for a small number of user accounts (5 I
Bret Miller wrote:
[snip]
CommuniGate Pro is not open source, but offers a free community
edition license (i.e., no key required) for 5 or less
users. It runs
fine on Windows (I use it at the office), has free
3rd-party add-ons for
SpamAssassin (http://www.tffenterprises.com/cgpsa
I received an odd email that makes spamd fall over. I'm
using the SAWin32 port, and was wondering whether other users
could also see the same problem with this message or whether
the problem is peculiar to the Windows port.
The glaring weirdness with this email is obviously the RSET
in the
using the DAG site and rpm -U, I updated spamassassin and
spamassissin-tools to
3.1.7-1
Things don't look so good. Here is what happened when I
restarted spamd
spamd[26917]: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM, shutting down
spamd[27082]: persistent_udp: no such method at
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
Yes.
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad
icon, but the original cf files I have in my ftp, has no icon.
I generally have to use Wordpad with cf files supplied by others
Please give me some simple advice - I've upgraded 3.0.3 to 3.1.7 from
backports.org for my Debian Sarge (stable) installation. I'm
still using my former local.cf.
I've noticed that my ham is no longer being tagged with
X-Spam headers, but
the spam is getting these headers - at the top of
I am looking for an easy way for my spamassassin to relearn messages
marked as spam that users would like to get. Would it be
safe and avoid
bayesian poisoning if I were to setup an email box such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and have users forward nonspam emails to this email
address and then
Forwarding is not a good idea, it adds and or changes the
headers in
the mail.
Forward as attachment(s) could be a solution since original mail
headers are kept intact. I've asked a similar question on this list
some days ago, but nobody could say if there's a common practice how
Answer n when it asks about building spamc.
Or try this port: http://physics.ucsd.edu/~epivovar/anti-spam.htm
Bret
Im trying to install SpamAssasin under Windows,I installed
perl and nmake.
But I'm getting these errors:
---
C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe version.h.pl
version.h.pl: creating
i'm getting some problems with the spamassassin spf modul
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF) maybe i can resolve this problem by
asking the list.
Please take a look at this header:
--- start cut ---
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:45:20
Chris Lear wrote:
* Oliver Schulze L. wrote (18/12/06 15:42):
Nice stats!
How do you generate them in SA 3.1.7 ?
I use this:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt
Chris
Does this require using spamd instead of invoking
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 11:35 am, Bret Miller wrote:
Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)?
I'm running it
in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here
had an opinion
before doing anything serious with it.
TIA,
Bret
Bret, on my home
- why doesn't Spam Assassin recognize all these with the same
subject/body as spam?
Did you train your bayes database on one or more of these messages to
tell it they were spam? It scored bayes_00 meaning it thinks it's not
spam.
- any suggestions/advice?
www.rulesemporium.com. Get the
I have a bayes question I am hoping someone may be able to
answer for me. Since implementing bayes it has been doing a
very good job except for one thing.
One particular spam email is not getting tagged as spam. My
rules are scoring the email high enough to be tagged as spam,
but it is
Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)? I'm running it
in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an opinion
before doing anything serious with it.
TIA,
Bret
Has anyone here tried MSRBL (http://www.msrbl.com/site/)?
I'm running
it in trial now, but thought I'd ask to see if anyone here had an
opinion before doing anything serious with it.
I ran it here for a few hours with rblsmtpd and it got 0 hits, which
also means 0 FP's on a very busy
In my above example, SPF did nothing useful. And, my example shows
exactly why SPF does not help at all with the spambot
problem. If I'm a
spambot wrangler, I create a group of throw-away domains, put in SPF
records for them that say +all, and then send out my storm of spam.
Then I
Has anyone managed to build DomainKeys or DKIM modules for Windows. I
managed to build the OpenSSL libraries OK, but can't get
Crypt::OpenSSL:RSA to install, so DomainKeys won't either... Any ideas?
Bret
I should probably submit this to bz, but I thought I'd ask here first in
case it's obvious... Why is SFP_PASS not firing on this?
X-Spam-Tests:
tests=AWL=-1.710,BAYES_50=0.001,BOTNET=0.5,BOTNET_BADDNS=0.01,
BOTNET_NOSPF=3.5,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.708,
Bret Miller wrote:
I should probably submit this to bz, but I thought I'd ask
here first in
case it's obvious... Why is SFP_PASS not firing on this?
Run the message through spamassassin -Dspf and find out.
Daryl
OK. It says:
[2840] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=65.17.198.50
Bret Miller wrote:
I should probably submit this to bz, but I thought I'd ask
here first in
case it's obvious... Why is SFP_PASS not firing on this?
Run the message through spamassassin -Dspf and find out.
Daryl
OK. It says:
[2840] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip
Question 2: someone asked why my module is Botnet instead of
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Botnet. The answer is: when I first
started this (and this is/was my first SA Plugin authoring
attempt), I
tried that and it didn't work. If someone wants to look at it, and
figure out how to make
Hello, I was wondering if there is a way to write a rule for
HTML source code contained in an email. I am getting many of
these Buy This Stock emails and I am finding that the
pictures contained in them all have a portion of a line of
source that says...
src=cid:
Thanks in advance for any
, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP, RCVD_IN_XBL
X-Spam-Level:
Best Regards,
Leon Kolchinsky
-Original Message-
From: Bret Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:04 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to extract
Is there any automatic way (using a script), to extract the
Reverse DNS hostname for the host that delivered the message to
my network?
The top Received header should contain the server you received the
message from. That's the one that needs to go in the whitelist_from_rcvd
line.
Bret
Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 16:04 schrieb Amos:
(...)
Actually, it's getting to the extent that some at work are raising
questions as to whether our SA setup will be able to
maintain adequate
protection from this growing onslaught.
Amos
Only AFTER adequate initial RBL filtering.
am using CGPro as mail server, and i need some help and advice
I am planning to implement CGPSA on our ingate servers and am
not quite sure if it is a good idea
we recieve almost 7000 email per hour and i don't know if
spamassassin is going to miss anything
another question
for the amount
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
FWIW, it happens to be the official tool since no one
ever submitted
RDJ to be the official tool, so we had to write our own.
I would have offered, had I known there was any interest.
Chris T.
I'm glad it isn't the official tool since it doesn't run natively on
I would like to change the scores on the following.
Could you tell me what file they are located in or how to
modify the score?
Thank you
HOST_EQ_DSL HOST_EQ_DSL_
HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D
HOST_EQ_PACBELL_DSL
HOST_MISMATCH_NET
I am running Redhat enterprise 4 with SpamAssassin 3.1.4 with
I've been getting lots of porn site spam containing words with doubled
letters, like this one:
Orrgy pornn parrties! Lotts of
sttupid bitchees gangbangged by queue of guyss.
annal_nailing and cum__swallowing orgiees.
archiive of group_ssex
...omissis...
How about the FuzzyOCR plugin? That has been discussed quite a bit
here recently.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
--
Bowie
And, by the way, it seems to work!
Actually, the only limit I see is the own-made FuzzyOcr.words
(and, maybe, the fact
I just install a new version of spamassassin.
What do I need to do, so it learns everything?
You may wish to run sa-update:
Or install additional add-on rules:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Or run sa-learn against a recent set of ham (non-spam) and spam
messages. The
I came across a situation that seems non-intuitive;
Two emails this am were spam, but hit BAYES_00. So they were
(presumably) learned as Ham somewhere along the way.
Not a valid presumption. The tokens may have been learned as ham from
other messages, but there is no implication that this
Me again. Since I'm not getting any responses I better keep
posting more
information as I've made some more investigating today.
Sometimes when I run sa-learn --force-expire I get this
response almost immediately:
Bus error (core dumped)
When I run again the process just hogs until I break
I used to have problems with bayes locking and journaling. When it
finally corrupted the database, I decided it was time to put
it into a
real SQL database instead of using DB_File. Haven't had a
single problem
with bayes CPU or locking since.
Maybe it's time you consider using MySQL?
I have SA 3.1.5 installed on Windows Server 2003, but
I'm running ActivePerl 5.8.8.817. Guess it's time to check for 819... May I have
the "perl makefile.pl" output, please?
Bret
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Thomas Meier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having trouble
installing Spam
First, thanks all that sent me help to get a test message to
work. I was
able to successfully get SA to trigger.
It appears that SA is only currently working on my local mail accounts
and not the alias/forward emails.
So what I have is an Hosting provider which hosts my domain, that I
A poll for the list: do you consider it reasonable for a plugin to
require ghostscript?
(Assume for the sake of argument that rendering postscript is
necessary to the analysis the plugin is performing.)
I don't see how it's any more of a problem than requiring gocr...
Actually, probably
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
