Agreed, it seems to be deliberate to get people moved over to the big
providers, they are clearly discouraging independent email servers as
they clearly scored differently.
I have even been doing tests on various spare unused ip's and the
amount that get blocked by microsoft (but no other
>
> > > > > Is there a simple way? SpamAssassin version 3.4.2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
Here's a procmail recipe I use to mark large files
:0 fh w
* > 10
* ^Subject:\/.*
| formail -I "Subject: {* -BIG- *} $MATCH"
You can change the file size in the 2nd line to meet your needs.
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
08:07:17 up 14 days, 23:10, 1 user, load average: 3.29, 2.60, 1.69
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, kernel 5.4.0-58-generic
s is Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS Spamassassin
spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.4.4
running on Perl version 5.30.0
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
20:00:37 up 11:04, 1 user, load average: 1.50, 1.16, 1.02
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, kernel 5.4.0-58-generic
t; That is indeed v1.0.1
> >
> > > It's old, 20190704
Riccardo, after updating the issue has been resolved.
Thank you
Chris
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:43:53 up 1 day, 3:38, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 0.74, 0.71
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, kernel 5.4.0-48-generic
t; That is indeed v1.0.1
> >
> > > It's old, 20190704
I picked up 20200825 last night, just waiting for my new key.
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
09:37:02 up 17:31, 1 user, load average: 0.53, 0.39, 0.47
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, kernel 5.4.0-48-generic
.0.2, i.e. has the rdns chop [1] in the
> module.
>
> > Here's the message complete with body -
> > https://pastebin.com/CW7Vj7Yh
> > This written to my syslog - https://pastebin.com/M12PS1fK
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/spamhaus/spamassassin-dqs/blob/master/SH.pm
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 20:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> >
> > > > > > > spamd[435769]: dns: new_dns_packet
> > > > > > > (domain=o279.send.iheartdogs.co
On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 03:40 +, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>
> > > > > > spamd[435769]: dns: new_dns_packet
> > > > > > (domain=o279.send.iheartdogs.com..x
> > > > > > x/db
> > > >
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:49 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 18:54 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > > > The complete error looks like this:
> >
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:49 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 18:54 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > > > The complete error looks like this:
> >
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 18:54 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Chris wrote:
>
> > The complete error looks like this:
> >
> > spamd[435769]: dns: new_dns_packet
> > (domain=o279.send.iheartdogs.com..xx/dbl.dq
> > .spa
&g
doesn't hurt anything however I'm just curious as to what
might be causing it. It appears to have been going on all year so far
but as I said not with every incoming message just from certain domains
it seems.
Any ideas?
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
20:12:39 up 4:07, 1 user, load
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 16:14 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:17:09 -0500
> Chris wrote:
>
> > Since my update to Ubuntu 20.04 last Wed I've been seeing this in
> > every message that's run through spamassassin.
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/hy6WGXYH
should begin my research on this would be appreciated.
Thanks
Chris
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
09:05:49 up 17:43, 1 user, load average: 1.64, 1.39, 1.28
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, kernel 5.4.0-48-generic
age a few plugins of my own for installation on other systems
and hence you mangle the spamassassin package itself?
oh my lord..
[root@mail-gw:~]$ rpm -qa | grep spamassassin | sort
spamassassin-3.4.4-1.fc31.x86_64
spamassassin-bogofilter-1.0-8.fc31.20200204.rh.noarch
smart people would have opened koji, enter spamasssin,, select the F31
package from
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=554 and
downloaded
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/spamassassin/3.4.4/1.fc31/x86_64/spamassassin-3.4.4-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
or just used "dnf
On 2/4/2020 5:12 PM, Chris Conn wrote:
On 2/4/2020 5:09 PM, Damian wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7785 maybe?
Hello,
You were correct; using 3.4.3 on fedora with milter-spamc, pretty much
every email would match DKIM_INVALID when handled by the MTA
On 2/4/2020 5:09 PM, Damian wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7785 maybe?
Hello,
HM, very possible. I am using milter-spamc but the behaviour might be
similar. I will look to build 3.4.4 and see if I get better DKIM
returns. Thanks for this.
Chris
I am
the MTA-level scan
by the milter would score it invalid and a commandline test of the .eml
would return a different value on the same spamassassin daemon?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
.4.3 they backported
the fixes to 3.4.2. I'm getting ready to file another bug report
requesting upgrade to 3.4.4 listing the CVE's affected and see what
happens.
>
> Then they would presumably backport the SHA-256 checksum handling,
> as
> it is a security issue...
>
>
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
17:12:12 up 2 days, 8:39, 1 user, load average: 1.41, 0.72, 0.54
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS, kernel 5.3.0-28-generic
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 00:56 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 9 Jan 2020, at 17:32, Chris wrote:
>
> > Since upgrading my Ubuntu 18.04.3 to ClamAV version 0.102.1
> > yesterday
> > I've been seeing this in my syslog:
> >
> > spamd[2455]: Use of uninitialized value
I am a fan of the Rule2XSBody plugin. Maybe
thats old fashioned, I don't know; but Centos/RHEL being so strict on
their versioning, Centos8 is stuck with 3.4.2 forever so I am happily
running 3.4.3 on it.
Best of luck in your build, hope this helps,
Chris
//) at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.26.1/File/Scan/ClamAV.pm line 227
Line 224 - chomp(my $r = $conn->getline);
Line 227 - if($r =~ /stream:\ (.+)\ FOUND/ix){
Is this an issue with ClamAV.pm or with ClamAV itself?
Chris
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
16:27:34 up 38 days, 7:10, 1 user, l
I've submitted a bug report to Ubuntu to get SA upgraded by the newest
version:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1856248
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:49:22 up 17 days, 10:32, 1 user, load average: 1.20, 0.91, 0.60
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 14:47 -0500, Dave Goodrich wrote:
> That looks very familiar, and exactly what I am looking for. I can
> make that script work with our log files, thank you.
>
> DAve
>
You're welcome.
--
Chris
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
17:28:20 up 3 days, 8:1
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:40:27 -0800
Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I’m relatively new to complex custom rules. I have plenty of simple
> and some multi-condition rules but need something custom.
>
> My approach to using my domain name is bad but I started it in the
> 90s so… I
not turning up
> anything for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DAve
>
Forgot to add what the output looks like
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:11:09 up 2 days, 9:54, 1 user, load average: 0.66, 0.42, 0.39
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS, kernel 5.0.0-
not turning up
> anything for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DAve
>
Here's what I use for my home system
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
18:06:20 up 2 days, 8:49, 1 user, load average: 0.90, 0.81, 0.84
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS, kernel 5.0.0-37-g
From: Martin Gregorie
Reply: mar...@gregorie.org
Date: December 4, 2019 at 4:12:22 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom rule help
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:40 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> I want a rule that scores if “sitename” is not in the From: line. If
> the
Hi.
I’m relatively new to complex custom rules. I have plenty of simple and
some multi-condition rules but need something custom.
My approach to using my domain name is bad but I started it in the 90s so…
I have some sites where I gave them my email address as “
sitename@mydomain.com” so I
ecanisms?
Cheers and thanks,
Chris
On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 16:10 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 10:29 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure how
On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 16:10 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 10:29 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure how
On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 10:29 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure how to exactly word the problem so the subject is the
> > best
> > I can do for now. Whenever a crojob is run a message is sent out
> > via
>
was rejected for
containing spam. Any ideas what was in the latest rule updates to cause
this?
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
11:56:52 up 1 day, 18:07, 1 user, load average: 1.21, 0.70, 0.65
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS, kernel 4.18.0-22-generic
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 18:29 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > This is the 2nd of these ransom spams I've received where the body
> > of
> > the message is a .jpg. Below is the body and also a link to the
> > heade
Fuz1=1 Fuz2=many
DCC Brand is x.dcc-servers
PYZOR Results are Reported 0 times.
I don't know if a rule exists for something like this or not.
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
20:04:36 up 9 days, 12:23, 1 user, load average: 1.15, 1.15, 1.12
Description
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 17:08 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2018, at 16:24, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:14 -0600, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 19:00 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> > > > On 11 Dec 20
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:14 -0600, Chris Pollock wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 19:00 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> > On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:37, Chris Pollock wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > >
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 19:00 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:37, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Anyway, as of today I've capped those 2 subrules at levels which
> > > leave ample
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 19:00 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:37, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Anyway, as of today I've capped those 2 subrules at levels which
> > > leave ample
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2018, at 18:23, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2018-12-09 at 13:06 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> > > On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:04, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is probably very trivial
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2018, at 18:23, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2018-12-09 at 13:06 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> > > On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:04, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is probably very trivial
On Sun, 2018-12-09 at 13:06 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:04, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > This is probably very trivial and doesn't affect anything except
> > maybe
> > the size of the headers but I have to ask. When looking at the
> > headers
>
listed? Couldn't each subtest be listed just once instead of
multiple times?
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
10:58:20 up 1 day, 15:22, 1 user, load average: 0.67, 0.49, 0.31
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.15.0-42-generic
signature.asc
Description
t; > installed
> > and sa-compile was installed later.
>
> I am using SA on Ubuntu 18.04 without any such problems. Looking at
> the package changelogs for SA 3.4.1-8 under Debian/Ubuntu they are
> identical except that, for Ubuntu 18.04, SA was rebuilt
> against openssl1.1.
I noticed in a post that Kevin McGrail made that the 'sought' rules are
no longer published. So, my update-channels file that SA-Update reads
should have only one entry:
updates.spamassassin.org
Is that correct
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
14:38:23 up 3
Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 20:45 Chris wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 11:03 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >
> > > Good Morning,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > On behalf of the Apache SpamAssassin Project Management
> > Committee, I
> >
>
urity announcement
> will
> follow within the next 24 hours.
>
> Apache SpamAssassin can be downloaded from
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi and via cpan
> (Mail::SpamAssassin).
>
I assume that once the Ubuntu folks get the security announcement
they'll build and r
r/bin/mail -s KAM_changes jpff
> /bin/systemctl -l reload spamassassin.service
>
> exit 0
>
> Sems to work OK; noting special
>
Thanks, looks good, I'll give it a try.
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2018, Chris wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have a script that I can run as a cro
Does anyone have a script that I can run as a cron job to update the
KAM.cf file?
Thanks
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
12:27:45 up 14:39, 1 user, load average: 8.88, 3.45, 1.40
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.15.0-32-generic
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 23:00 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:25:14 -0500
> Chris wrote:
>
> > Early on when SA-Compile was run I did manage to capture this:
> >
> > Running sa-compile (may take a long time)
> > Unescaped left brace in regex is d
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 14:46 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, Chris wrote:
>
> > Early on
> > when SA-Compile was run I did manage to capture this:
> >
> > Running sa-compile (may take a long time)
> > Unescaped left brace in regex i
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 17:54 +0100, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 17:34, Chris wrote:
> > I noticed last night while updating to 18.04.1 that there were
> > warnings
> > about SA Compile. I tried to copy to the clipboard however that
&g
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 17:54 +0100, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 17:34, Chris wrote:
> > I noticed last night while updating to 18.04.1 that there were
> > warnings
> > about SA Compile. I tried to copy to the clipboard however that
&g
ntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
11:18:49 up 13:48, 1 user, load average: 1.43, 1.26, 1.07
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.15.0-32-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
an get 3.4.x deployed.
Thanks again,
Chris
; got hit: "your business"
Apr 20 14:14:06.444 [27778] dbg: rules: ran body rule __HIGHBITS ==>
got hit: "â?¢ â?? "
Apr 20 14:14:06.590 [27778] dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so
far=4.
however, with Rule2XSBody enabled, on SA 3.3.1 on Centos6, it loops forever.
With or witout Rule2XSBody on Centos7 SA 3.4.0-2 bundled SA rpm, it
works correctly.
I am disabling Rule2XSBody for now while I rebuild Centos7 boxes.
Chris
On 4/18/2018 10:32 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Chris Conn skrev den 2018-04-18 16:00:
this is a relatively old install, SA 3.3.1 on Centos6 (stock RPMs)
maybe solved in centos7 ?
i do not use precompiled problems
Hello,
I believe I found the issue. On my Centos6 boxes with SA 3.3.1
, and eventually croaks with that msg.
Thanks folks,
Chris
to be a function in Timeout.pm
this is a relatively old install, SA 3.3.1 on Centos6 (stock RPMs)
Any tips on how to troubleshoot the essence or root of this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
hich was useless also) or
call. You might try them though.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
15:31:38 up 9 days, 23:04, 1 user, load average: 0.94, 0.83, 0.74
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, kernel 4.13.0-32-ge
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 13:09 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 09:37 PM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > rules: failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test, skipping:
> > > (Can't locate object method
> > > "check_for_forged_gm
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 21:15 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 08:04 PM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > Yesterday there were no issues with my once a day update. Today it
> > exited with a code 4. Here is the output:
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/aXvk0QQu
Yesterday there were no issues with my once a day update. Today it
exited with a code 4. Here is the output:
https://pastebin.com/aXvk0QQu
Any ideas on what seems to be the problem?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
20:02:58 up 2:46, 1 user, load
after I changed the tmp dir to /var/tmp
instead of /var/lib/clamav/tmp
> On 30/01/2018 17:50, Chris wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing this - https://pastebin.com/86s7cVBj and I'm not sure if
> > it's an SA issue or a ClamAV issue.
> >
> > apt-cache policy cla
I'm seeing this - https://pastebin.com/86s7cVBj and I'm not sure if
it's an SA issue or a ClamAV issue.
apt-cache policy clamav
clamav:
Installed: 0.99.3-0ubuntu1~chris+1
Candidate: 0.99.3-0ubuntu1~chris+1
apt-cache policy spamassassin
spamassassin:
Installed: 3.4.1-3
Candidate: 3.4.1-3
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 16:26 -0600, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
> Just a hunch, but did you make sure to add the "$self->register..."
> line inside the "sub new {" block with all the others in
> HeaderEval.pm?
>
Yep, sure did, thanks for that. All is well now.
&g
> }
> }
>
> R.G.
>
Just for the heck of it I added the above to my SpamAssassin setup at
home. However my syslog shows:
rules: failed to run __F_DM1 test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "from_domains_mismatch" via package "Mail:
[...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgSt
n
> logs; I am quite confident that nothing was really seriously broken,
> but I understand that it may have annoyed some people.
>
Thanks for the explanation Alex, I wasn't annoyed, just baffled. As you
said, everything is back to normal.
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11
I started seeing this yesterday evening - https://pastebin.com/Q01t63uf
AFAICT it's happening on every message that is processed by SA. This
is:
spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.4.1
running on Perl version 5.22.1
Any ideas?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 13:17 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 01:09 PM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > Over the past few days I've been seeing the above. The complete
> > output
> > is:
> >
> > /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin:
> > erro
for this?
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
13:05:38 up 8 days, 2:06, 1 user, load average: 0.45, 0.72, 0.80
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, kernel 4.10.0-40-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 09:06 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 08:57 AM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 07:22 -0600, David Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > Great news! Last night's run finally produced a full
> > > 72_scores.cf.
> >
ruleset to my platforms and will monitor
> scoring/blocking over the next couple of days.
>
Hmm, the file doesn't seem to be able to be found unless of course I
did something incorrectly:
chris@localhost:~/Downloads$ wget http://sa-update.ena.com/${REV}.tar.g
z
--2017-11-16 08:51:50--
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 11:58 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:39 -0500, Chris wrote:
> >
> > It was installed by default when upgrading from 14.04LTS to
> > 16.04LTS
> >
> Then it may be best to just leave it there.
>
> >
&
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 15:22 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-09-20 17:02, Chris wrote:
>
> >
> > So, IIUC it would be a good idea to remove the resolv.conf symlink
> > in
> > /run/resolvconf ?
> Definitely _not_ a good idea while the resolvconf package
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:05 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 08:48 -0500, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 11:15 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 19:32 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > > >
be a good idea to remove the resolv.conf symlink in
/run/resolvconf ?
> Finally (and getting really OT), it helps to keep relevant /etc files
> under version control, so you know when the system helpfully shifts
> the
> ground under you.
>
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
16:42:52 up 19:55, 1 user, load average: 0.65, 0.59, 0.83
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS, kernel 4.10.0-35-generic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
nethack 3.4.2-2 2 ogra -
pubip0.6 28thibran-
snappy-debug 0.31.4-snapd2.26.9 70canonical -
snapweb 0.26-11-dev 307 canonical -
speed-test 1.8.0 16bartaz -
wallpaper
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 23:04 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2017, at 22:36, Chris wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 04:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 20.09.2017 um 02:32 schrieb Chris:
> > > >
> &
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 11:15 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 19:32 -0500, Chris wrote:
> >
> > Hi Martin, here's what I see:
> >
> > sudo systemctl status dnsmasq
> > [sudo] password for chris:
> > ● dnsmasq.service
> &g
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 04:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 20.09.2017 um 02:32 schrieb Chris:
> >
> > I then installed dnsmasq (apparently it wasn't installed)
> frankly clean up your mess - you recently posted dnsmasq as well as
> named listening on different int
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 19:32 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 00:40 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:44 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks Martin, here's what I get, it appears to not b
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 00:40 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 16:44 -0500, Chris wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks Martin, here's what I get, it appears to not be running.
> >
> > sudo systemctl stop dnsmasq
> > [sudo] password for chris:
&
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 15:40 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 08:41 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> >
> > On 09/19/2017 08:25 AM, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 08:16 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 14:47 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Chris wrote:
>
> > I'm getting different outputs each time I run dig +trace
> > 65.43.116.208.iadb.isipp.com
> >
> > 65.43.116.208.iadb.isipp.com. 3600 IN A 127.0.1.255
> >
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 22:07 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 15:40 -0500, Chris wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > &g
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 08:41 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 08:25 AM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 08:16 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 07:45 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 08:16 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 07:45 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> >
> > On 09/18/2017 06:03 PM, Chris wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > localhost dnsmasq[2323]: started, version 2.75 cachesize 150
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 07:45 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 06:03 PM, Chris wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > localhost dnsmasq[2323]: started, version 2.75 cachesize 150
> > localhost dnsmasq[2323]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus
> > i18n IDN DHCP DHCPv6
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 12:32 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 11:52 AM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 11:40 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > On 09/18/2017 11:14 AM, Chris wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
&
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 11:40 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 11:14 AM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 11:11 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18 Sep 2017, at 10:57, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > >
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 11:11 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2017, at 10:57, Chris wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > >
> > > I am receiving many hits on *_IADB_* rules just fine recently for
> > > emails
> > > from constantcontact.com and others.
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 09:28 -0500, David Jones wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 09:12 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >
> > On 9/16/2017 4:36 PM, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm also seeing issues with ISIPP which is in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf.
> > > I've
> > > atta
On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 16.09.2017 um 16:27 schrieb Chris:
> >
> > named[1284]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE resolving
> > '165.170.166.108.iadb.isipp.com/A/IN': 168.150.251.35#53
> > named[1284]: host unreachable resolving
>
On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 09:45 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Chris & all,
> I have opened a bug about this:
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7471
>
> I believe scoring it 0 for now will disable the rule but that's just
> hiding the issue.
&g
since as I said at first it's not causing any other issues it's just something
that had been nagging at me since I keep seeing it and wondering why.
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092 ft)
19:44:07 up 7 days, 3:12, 1 user, load average: 0.55, 2.25, 2.56
Descrip
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 18:20 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 9/15/2017 5:50 PM, Chris wrote:
> >
> > It's not a 'show stopper' it's just annoying to keep seeing this
> > and
> > wondering what the cause is.
> You have configured your installation with the Bara
ede...@mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net> for
chris:1000
localhost named[1284]: connection refused resolving
'190.129.2.198.bb.barracudacentral.org/A/IN': 64.235.154.72#53
Is this an issue with an SA rule or some kind of an issue with Bind?
I'm only using it as a caching name server. When running the message
t
1 - 100 of 1758 matches
Mail list logo
