Jo Rhett wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 2:02 AM, David B Funk wrote:
It still should not matter. So long as the client can authenticate to
the server's statisfaction, SA should honor its decision regardless of
how bogus the HELO or client's DNS entrys look.
That's your argument. That may not
Alan Munday wrote:
By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the
stock
rules. However, there have been additional channels created for
sa-update
to allow it to update the SARE rules as well. You just add the ones you
want to your sa-update channels file.
One
René Berber wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar problem as the one recently reported by J. Rhett in thread
skipping SPF checks for authenticated users. I'm trying to use Botnet plugin
and make it not score for authenticated users; having the same for SPF and RBL
would be even better.
So the problem
Henk van Lingen wrote:
Hi Daryl,
I restored my situation from two days ago, and the problem returned.
Your patch seems to fix the problem.
Thanks for confirming the fix Henk. Fixed in the 3.1 branch (3.1.8) and
trunk.
Daryl
Henk van Lingen wrote:
[14411] dbg: generic: unlinking 10_misc.cf
Insecure dependency in unlink while running with -T switch at
/usr/bin/sa-update line 1173.
Please try the attached patch and *please* let me know if it resolves
the problem.
Daryl
Index: sa-update.raw
Henk van Lingen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:55:36AM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Henk van Lingen wrote:
[14411] dbg: generic: unlinking 10_misc.cf
Insecure dependency in unlink while running with -T switch at
/usr/bin/sa-update line 1173.
Please try the attached
leemansvg wrote:
This might be a simple question for most of you. How would I prevent
spamassassin from scanning my internal mail
Don't pass the mail to SpamAssassin. SA is a mail filter, it'll filter
anything it's given.
Daryl
John Andersen wrote:
How is it these spams slip under the radar with such low scores?
They seldom score about 3.1 in my setup even with network tests
and bayes (SA 3.1.7).
I don't think I've seen such a spam pass as ham, although you've been
quite vague.
I wish I could find an effective
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Mark Martinec wrote:
Indeed. Also coupling it with p0f (passive operating system
fingerprinting)
Good idea. Should have thought of that. :-)
About p0f see:
Those who like SQL might like the stuff at
Mark Martinec wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea,
BTW... has anyone ever got the -Q option to have p0f itself listen on a
socket to work, instead of using their own wrapper?
The core problem is that p0f needs the full TCP session specification
in a query: client and server IP address, as well
Mark Martinec wrote:
Daryl,
Yeah, but I have the session info
Lucky you! But the difficulty of providing a p0f plugin for SA
Luck of the Irish Mark! :)
remains, SA can only obtain its information by parsing mail header,
so there are basically just two options:
- let MTA (or amavisd)
Patrick Sherrill wrote:
Using sendmail/amavis-new/SA with Dual MTAs. Unfortunately, we still
have a few relay domains unable to reasonably provide a userlist for us
and we have really been getting slammed over the last few days. I
realize this may be slightly off topic, but I could use some
Simon wrote:
Hi There,
Im slowly getting there with custom rulesets... Would someone be able
to check this out and offer any help if i have it incorrect?
Email is coming in with the subject Name wrote:, where Name is a
persons name.
Subject =~ /\b[a-z]+\s+wrote:/i
Thanks in advance
That'll
John Rudd wrote:
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, John Rudd wrote:
I've changed RelayChecker's name to Botnet (since that's its real
purpose: identify potential botnet submitted messages). Here's the
0.4 release.
... So, let me know what you think. Let me know if you find any
Rene Caspari wrote:
Yes, this seems to be the problem, for authentication we use an external
daemon for pop-before-smtp. Exim (3.36 - I know, its extremely outdated
:-) reads the database file for the IP to allow relaying.
So there is no authenticated content in the Received-headers, but a
new
On 11/19/2006 3:01 PM, thekillerbean wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 0:02
To: thekillerbean
Subject: Offlist: RE: Help with sa-learn when using Outlook 2003.
Point your self somewhere else then.
It works for
Christian Aust wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using spamassassin 3.1.7 on Debian 3.1 w/ postfix 2.3.3 and GNU
MailMain 2.1.5. When I last sent out a message to the list participants,
I encountered this:
Two users having an local account on the same machine from which the
mail comes are subscribed to
What version of SA are you using?
Daryl
Philip Prindeville wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail1.microsoft.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp.microsoft.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] maila.microsoft.com
will that work?
It should.
Daryl
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 02:10 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
Charlie Clark wrote:
Looks like I'm on top of the resources problem but I am getting 421
delivery errors even though the e-mails are coming through. This
looks very similar to bug 3828 (which is Spamassassin + Exim
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:22:12PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates?
I posted this a while ago:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualRuleUpdates
It's even linked in from the Development Information link
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 09.11.2006 um 19:27 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
If your one and only child is busy doing an expire it can't scan
messages too.
ah, so I could increase the number of children running to do this?
You could, running at least 2 children if you've got the resources
Mark Merchant wrote:
i just upgraded spamassassin 3.1.0 to 3.1.7 ( Rh9 ) and seem to be
getting an extra line-break in the Content-Type header.
outlook apparently sees the semi-colon as a LF and doesn't render
the email correctly. evolution sees it as a semi colon and every-
thing works fine.
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I have already decreased the Bayes_50_Body rule from 5.0 to 2.5. I
don't want to decrease the scores with every Bayes rule because I think
I will start seeing some true spam delivered because it did not score
high.
Any ideas?
Don't screw with the bayes scoring that
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I have already decreased the Bayes_50_Body rule from 5.0 to 2.5. I
don't want to decrease the scores with every Bayes rule because I
think
I will start seeing some true spam delivered because it did not score
high.
Any ideas?
Daryl wrote:
Don't screw with the bayes
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm wondering which rules you have that flagged that so well. The same spam
message for me scored low: (X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=4.9
tests=BAYES_50, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, HTML_MESSAGE, TRACKER_ID
autolearn=no version=3.1.7). I'm using all
Charlie Clark wrote:
Looks like I'm on top of the resources problem but I am getting 421
delivery errors even though the e-mails are coming through. This looks
very similar to bug 3828 (which is Spamassassin + Exim). Except this bug
should have been closed a long time ago.
Without looking
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, November 03, 2006 5:43 PM + Justin Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw.
I don't see it either. What's the name of the rule?
I looked at this a few days ago when Theo mentioned it, and forgot to
Rose, Bobby wrote:
I believe the correct process here is that the moderators of the SA
listserver investigate why the listserver got listed on Spamcop. If it
is a case where there are addresses to spamtraps in the list, then maybe
the list needs to send out opt-in verification messages to
John Fleming wrote:
Real novice here - Would someone please explain how a stock spam was
able to use my whitelist to get a huge negative score? I do have a
whitelist, but the user shown below is not in it. I do have one
Italian (.it) domain in the whitelist, but it is a different/address
Steve Lake wrote:
Ok, this isn't right.
Agreed.
I upgraded my SA install to 3.1.17 day
before yesterday. I cycled the server and now all of a sudden I'm
getting 50% of the spam coming through that's getting completely
missed. Do I need to reset something or maybe bayes or is
Matt Kettler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
I've found a possible answer.
Spamassassin works with only 1 child.
Now I have add another child, 2.
And now all my mails have the header.
Is possible that spamassassin couldn't process all mails because has
only one child... so I have
Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:
Expecting some feedback on this.
You're a real funny man. :)
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:30 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: Wolfgang Uhr; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Age of a domain name - a new test?
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Chris
Roman Sozinov wrote:
Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
jasonegli wrote:
For example let's say that domain xyz.com wants to allow all messages
from
yahoo.com, but domain 123.com does not. Is there a way to allow FROM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Obtuse SMTPD (http://sd.inodes.org/) can
Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:46:28AM -0400, Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
Also is there an SA rule that scores messages that contain only a
single base64 part (as opposed to a base64-encoded attachment)? I
doubt many legitimate messages arrive with
Juan Mas wrote:
Im getting this odd behavior where spamd shuts itself down out of
nowhere. I cant really pinpoint what makes it shutdown just what Ive
found in the logs.
spamd[27466]: [spamd] fork: Cannot allocate memory at /usr/bin/spamd
I'd say that's a pretty good reason for it to stop
Nick Gilbert wrote:
[20193] dbg: bayes: first pass decided on 1382400 for atime delta
[20193] dbg: locker: refresh_lock: refresh
/home/nick/.spamassassin/bayes.lock
[20193] dbg: locker: refresh_lock: refresh
/home/nick/.spamassassin/bayes.lock
[20193] dbg: locker: refresh_lock: refresh
John Andersen wrote:
Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines:
Only from cron?
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in eval string at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in
Christian Quest wrote:
Are statistics that important ?
I'm not sure it is that important to get let spam go in. SA scoring is
based on huge corpus and gives good results. Bayes auto-adapts to the
spam and ham that is going thru the pre-filters one may set (like RBL
or greylisting). If there
Justin Mason wrote:
(In the meantime, I'm just going back to removing the BL, using
SpamAssassin instead, and using the Shortcircuit plugin to reduce CPU load
if RCVD_IN_SBL or RCVD_IN_XBL fires.)
Can you selectively short-circuit based on the user's prefs (ie. spam
traps vs not)?
Justin Mason wrote:
Jason Haar writes:
Obviously you have to have over-speced your mail servers to be able to
do this - something poor old Justin can't manage I think :-)
Yeah. If I could persuade someone to donate a server just for *my*
personal mail, that'd solve it, but in the meantime,
James Lavery wrote:
Hi all,
Version: 3.1.4
OS - Unslung 6.8 on a Linksys NSLU2 (Slug)
Running spamd with fetchmail and postfix
How much memory do one of those things have?
A couple of days ago the Slug hung with masses of disk activity; when I
looked at what was going on, it seemd that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I´m newbee to Spamassassin
I´ve install Spamassassin 3.1.5 a some spam are§not marked as a spam.
Whatś wrong in my settings of spamassassin
Especially this header:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list:
So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain?
I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users.
Afterall, if you have to whitelist them to avoid their messages being
marked as spam, what do you expect is going to happen when
James Lavery wrote:
Hi Daryl,
Aha - yes I think you've right. The Slug only has (I think) 32MB of memory,
and the symptoms are definitely of swap thrashing.
So I presume what I should do is reduce the max children, and put up with
reduced spamassassin performance when a lot of mails come in.
Kai Bolay wrote:
Hi!
I'm having trouble signing up at
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/createaccount.cgi - I never
receive the email with the randomly-generated password. I've tried with
various e-mail accounts - none of them gets any email.
Could someone check if this is borken?
An
Volker wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know if disabling skip_rbl_checks does stop razor 2
checks and DCC too even if razor2 and dcc are enabled in local.cf?
Run spamassassin in debug mode and find out.
Daryl
Matt Kettler wrote:
Another thing I've been noticing recently.. some idiot has been culling
the web archives of mailing lists, and is trying to send spam emails to
MESSAGE ID's of posts I've made. Check your mail logs!
I've been seeing this for about 9 months now. I'm now getting multiple
George R. Kasica wrote:
I've got my timeout here higher at 60 (slower box) and am not seeing
timeout errors or any K processes with 3.1.5 since switching back. It
only started with SA 3.1.7 so I'm thinking its something there thats
causing the issue.
I don't see anything in the 3.1.6/3.1.7
Mark wrote:
No, it's NOT good practice. Seriously. Without battering the point, it's
really perfectly legit for an MTA to use different HELO names (say, based
on hosting of virtual servers), whilst the IP address for that MTA has a
OK, we recognize the existence of virtual hosts. I know
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
*If* the system is set up to use the SPF plugin *and* enable/allow user
rules, it should still be possible for an end user to whitelist_from_spf.
You don't need to enable user rules for whitelist_from_spf, or any other
whitelist method, to work.
Daryl
George R. Kasica wrote:
I've dropped back to 3.1.5 last evening about 2200 CDT and no problems
since. I'm also running FuzzyOCR 2.3b here and did not see the problem
until I got to 3.1.7 I'll cc this to the FuzzyOCR list and see if
anyone there is seeing this
If someone(s) can
Jeff Fulmer wrote:
I'm getting occasional spam in my inbox that doesn't run through spam
assassin. I turned on procmail and discovered that spam assassin is dying
with -6. Details from the logs:
procmail: Executing /usr/local/bin/spamassassin
__db_assert: 0 failed: file
Sandy S wrote:
Daryl -
I switched back to 3.1.5 after my last post, and am sorry to report that I'm
still seeing the same issue under 3.1.5. After running a while, the
processes in a state of K start building up until I manually kill them.
That's great! ;) At least we know that this wasn't
To start, again, I have *nothing* against RDJ. I just like things to be
as efficient as practical (it's how I live and make a living), which is
why I like sa-update. I'll explain why sa-update is more efficient...
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I don't know that there is much difference in the
Chris Purves wrote:
How do I properly set trusted_networks when my mail server has a dynamic
IP address?
Assuming your dynamically address mail server is your only mail server,
and SA actually sees your public address, auto detection will probably
work fine.
If it's NATed and SA sees the
OpenMacNews wrote:
i've SA 317 installed on OSX 10.4.8.
i currently use RDJ to update SARE rules w/o error.
i use sa-update w/ channel=updates.spamassassin.org, also w/o error.
i'm switching to SARE updates via sa-update DOS's channels.
on exec of sa-update + SARE channels, i get multiple
OpenMacNews wrote:
after a clean install of SA 317, my DATADIR ((...)/SA/Dist/)
contains:
What's this DATADIR? Are you referring to what would normally be
something like /var/lib/spamassassin/ ?
DATADIR is what i've specified as my DATADIR @ build time.
Mmm... it's not too often that
If you're seeing subroutine redefined warnings you're loading the same
rules more than once, period.
Run spamassassin --lint -D and make note of what directories it's
loading rules from. Then go and blow away those directories (be careful
not to delete things you don't have a copy of... like
Jo Rhett wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
So perhaps I didn't get the Received header that will be added by this
host.
Yeah, so how did it get to SA? That's the problem. How can SA be
scanning it, if it hasn't reached this host yet?
Does this matter? SA *IS* scanning it,
Jo Rhett wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Unless you specify it in the configuration, SA has no idea what
servers are local for you. In this case, it has to make a guess so it
makes the (fairly reasonable) assumption that the most recent received
header comes from a local MX.
Oh. I get it. We're
Chris Santerre wrote:
I'm embarrassed to ask but, what cf file is that from?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rulesets]$ grep SARE_GIF_STOX * -R | grep meta
70_sare_stocks.cf/20060803.cf:meta SARE_GIF_STOX (
SARE_GIF_ATTACH __IMG_ONLY )
70_sare_stocks.cf/200608271034.cf:meta SARE_GIF_STOX
Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 17 oktober 2006 5:37
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: Jo Rhett; Magnus Holmgren; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED creating a problem
As discovered today, Jo's milter isn't adding
R Lists06 wrote:
Im a little confused in this thread now... please clarify this...
Does this mean my SA config is not correct if I do not have the ip address
of the SA box which is also the main SMTP box in the local.cf in that
trusted host config line?
*that* trusted host config line? Do
R Lists06 wrote:
Do you put the loopback 127.0.0.1 in your configs?
Yeah.
Diffenderfer, Randy wrote:
Folks,
I, too, have been having somewhat similar issues with 3.1.7. On a RH ES
3.0u7 box, kernel 2.4.21-40.ELsmp, I see these symptoms in syslog
(spamd running with -s local2):
Oct 14 21:42:01 samler1 spamd[18694]: prefork: child states: III
Oct 14 21:42:01 samler1
Diffenderfer, Randy wrote:
Well, if it is, they think it is fixed... :-)
I'm not sure why Duncan originally marked the bug as a dupe of 4370, but
I closed bug 4476 since (i) I couldn't reproduce it on my system after
reporting it and (ii) no-one else had reported having problems. A lot
of
Jo Rhett wrote:
Included below is a legitimate e-mail on a legitimate payment that I did
make.
I've looked at the rule, and I can't figure out why it failed.
After unwrapping the mail included in your message body, I can't
reproduce this under SA 3.1.8-r454679 using the ruleset
Jo Rhett wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Included below is a legitimate e-mail on a legitimate payment that I
did make.
I've looked at the rule, and I can't figure out why it failed.
After unwrapping the mail included in your message body, I can't
reproduce this under SA
Jo Rhett wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Is there any part of this rule that might be affected by using
Amavisd or testing via Milter? (I do both)
If whatever handled the message for scanning didn't fudge the
Received: from bigfootinteractive.com header like it should
Jo Rhett wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
this case, it's just a coincidence that I happen to provide the SARE
sa-update channel infrastructure too.
Well Thank You for that. I love sa-update.
Thank Theo, he's behind sa-update. I like it too, which is why I'm
willing to support the SARE
Jo Rhett wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I overlooked a couple ways that you could legitimately break a --lint
between updates, nobody else caught it either, so sa-update was (the
only thing) broken for some people in the SA 3.1.6 release. SA 3.1.7
reverted to the simpler --lint check
Jo Rhett wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I've been having some issues with the restarts, and when that happens
mail is down.
I'd say that's an issue of it's own, regardless of what sa-update does.
eh?
eh... The socket issues experienced during restarts have nothing to do
with sa
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
The autodetection is totally broken actually, and needs to be fixed.
I've added a comment to the Wiki to let people know about this.
Erm, Jo.. I assume you're referring to this:
---
''Comment: auto detection appears to be broken in
Gary V wrote:
body GV_MAKE_K / how to (generate|make) 1\.5 - 3\.5k /
score GV_MAKE_K 3.5
uri GEOCITIES /^http:\/\/(..|www)\.geocities\.com\/+.+/i
describe GEOCITIES Geocities URL
scoreGEOCITIES 3.5
FWIW, if you process large quantities of mail, scoring on just the
Geocities URI
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, October 14, 2006 12:18, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
How to disable ALL_TRUSTED ?
no
local.cf:
clear_internal_networks
internal_networks 127.0.0.0/8
clear_trusted_networks
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8
trusted_networks ip-of-your-mx-host
This is incorrect.
Gary V wrote:
I failed to find an example where a client or clients can be excluded
from a network that is configured in internal_networks. Some stupid NAT
boxes proxy the mail so it appears to come from that host. I would like
to include the internal network in internal_networks, but exclude
Frank Bures wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running sa-update once a day as a part of my daily housekeeping script.
Today, first time since I've been using spamassassin, the spamd would not
restart and the spam started pouring in.
Error message:
Starting spamd:
Toll, Eric wrote:
hello list:
I just set up a box who is:
FreeBSD 6.1
Perl 5.8.7
Spamassassin 3.1.6
and when I: spamassassin -D --lint, I get the following:
[67350] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL from @INC
[67350] dbg: plugin: registered
Jason Haar wrote:
I've been waiting for anyone else to bring it up - but no-one has.
If Spamhaus lose this lawsuit (which they are ignoring as they are
UK-based and this is some judge in Chicago), they may very well lose
their .ORG domain - which would have a rather large impact on our
Antispam
Larry Rosenman wrote:
3.1.6 on FreeBSD:
Oct 9 12:54:42 lists spamd[46015]: prefork: ordered child to accept, but
child reported state '1' at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScalin
g.pm line 450.
Any ideas on what this means?
Previous prefork status:
Oct 9
Email Lists wrote this to me instead of the list:
-
- This is normal behaviour when running --lint.
-
- Daryl
Side note, when running
spamassassin -D --lint
How do we get that to log to a file in a bash shell. Everything I have tried
so far has failed.
Angle brackets?
spamassassin -D
Kenneth Porter wrote:
I noticed today an unusually high incidence of spam subject lines of
Re: Hi, and I don't see a rule for this in the distribution. Do others
see this much in legitimate mail? Or could it make a good rule?
I see enough legit mail with such a subject go through my systems
Monty Ree wrote:
Hello..
I have operated sendmail + procmail + SA at linux.
and sometimes, it seems that SA doesn't work well.
At that times, I can see so lots of procmail processes.
But after spamd restart, SA works well...
So is there any script or tool to monitor spamd works well or
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Monty Ree wrote:
Hello..
I have operated sendmail + procmail + SA at linux.
and sometimes, it seems that SA doesn't work well.
At that times, I can see so lots of procmail processes.
But after spamd restart, SA works well...
So is there any script or tool
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
When I test spamassassin setup by running spamassassin -D --lint, I
get these complaints about spf:
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo
check
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF check
[6100] dbg:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.6 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.1.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200610050918
The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.
md5sum of archive files:
Mike Grau wrote:
Since upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.1.6, running sa-update yields
# sa-update
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_50
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule BAYES_05
...
error: lint check of current site config failed, cannot continue.
I assume
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Could you just add appropriate ifplugin lines for a more permanent fix?
Unfortunately, no. Everything in the local site config dir is loaded,
including the pre files. The default rules aren't loaded though... a
poor attempt at not bothering to lint rules that are
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
For now you'll have to disable the score lines while you do sa-update.
Temporarily renaming whatever.cf to whatever.cf-disabled is probably the
easiest way to go about it.
BTW, you could also delete or comment out the exit 2; around line 375
of sa-update.
Daryl
Fletcher Mattox wrote:
Hi,
How does one decrease the default Pyzor timeout of five seconds?
(without editing the source code :) )
The Pyzor SpamAssassin plugin documentation seems to mention a
pyzor_timeout option.
Daryl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I've discovered that if I attempt to forge the From: header in an
email
message that it ends up being considerably delayed when sent thru my providers
Email to SMS Gateway. I strongly suspect they have in place measures to
identify SPAM that will cause the
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:59:13PM +0200, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from
spamming the rest of the world?
While you can sell we block spam from your inbox to people as a reason to
pay you money, you can't sell
Rob McEwen wrote:
(CCing Marc Perkel because I seem to recall him knowing about this)
Not that I'd ever outright block based on this one factor alone, but...
Does anyone have any stats about what percentage of spam is directed towards
the highest MX Record? (that is, where there is more than
Steve Ingraham wrote:
If anyone has a simple way of updating rules for spamassassin I would
welcome your input. I still need to update the rules as I have been
getting a great number of emails coming through to users. Specifically,
we are getting a lot of the pharmaceutical spam and the
On 9/20/2006 8:00 PM, Salatiel Filho wrote:
I'm having troubles with spamassassin ,
Here it is the spam header:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably USER_IN_WHITELIST
is adding -100 to the total sum. But i have no idea why.
There's no griffield.biz http://griffield.biz on my
On 9/21/2006 12:46 AM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
I just found POPAuth plugin, it sound very nice and is exactelly what
I was looking for.
I'm looking for Rescue Me season 1 and 2 on DVD! :)
http://www.amazon.com/o/registry/2UUNX1ZJ2Y6S4
My only question is, when running spamd, whis is the
thekillerbean wrote:
jdow wrote:
Trust in-mtaX.MYISP.com.au.
{^_^}
Thanks a ton.
Now I know that I can simply type in the FQDN!
No, you can't. Single IPs or IP ranges using CIDR notation only.
I called my ISP and asked
for the subnet range they use for their mail servers and that's
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
thekillerbean wrote:
Now I know that I can simply type in the FQDN!
No, you can't. Single IPs or IP ranges using CIDR notation only.
Oh yeah, you can use one, two, or three parts of a dot quad, with a
trailing dot, for /8, /16, or /24s too, but IP ranges
501 - 600 of 1074 matches
Mail list logo
