Re: Score maths

score 3 > wasn't blocked. So the 2.9 indicates that it's not 3 ;) > > Kind regards, > >Tom > >> On 25-04-17 10:27, Geoff Soper wrote: >> X-Spam-Status: No, Score=2.9 >> >> X-Spam-Report: >> >> * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message wa

Score maths

X-Spam-Status: No, Score=2.9 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP * 3.0 GS_NO_RLYS_PHP No description available. X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on server.alphaworks.co.uk Can anyone explain why this isn't scoring 3.0? :)

Writing a rule to match a header name and value

I'm trying to write a rule that matches both the name of a header and its value. I've had no luck so far, can somebody point out my mistake? My current attempt is: header __GS_PHP_ORIG ALL =~ /^X-PHP-Originating-Script: [0 -9]+:(Mailer|Sendmail|Api).php/i An example line is:

Spam with attachments and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY

For a few weeks I've been suffering spam messages with attachments getting through with a suspicious score of 0.0. Upon inspection, they all had the following lines in the header: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on server.alphaworks.co.uk X-Spam-Level:

Program failure (69) of spamc

Hi, I'm calling spamc (3.3.2) from procmail as suggested at https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsedViaProcmail Having made a change to not use the lockfile (as suggsted in another thread) I'm now getting the following error in my procmail log: procmail: Program failure (69) of spamc

Spam messages bypassing SA

Hi, I've got an issue whereby spam messages seem to be somehow bypassing SA and getting into my inbox. I call SA via procmail as per https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsedViaProcmail The exact procmail file that calls SA is as follows: # #Standard SA call to be included from .procmailrc

Regular spam with distinctive URLs

I've been getting messages featuring distinctive URLs for some months and they're about the only spam that's making it past SA. I've posted a few example URLs at http://pastebin.com/qWvsW8HZ , you can see that they all follow a similar pattern (i.e. keywords in the path along with series of

Back to spam

After a couple of years without being greatly troubled by spam (a few a week), about a fortnight ago I started seeing 10-20 a day. They have a similar look and tone but I can't see any obvious ways to get them with rules. My trouble is that while all has been well, I've forgotten how SA

Re: SA not picking up rules from /var/lib/spamassassin/

On 13/01/2010 15:03, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Wed 13 Jan 2010 02:53:13 PM CET, Geoff Soper wrote saupdates.openprotect.com channel which contains recommended SAREs rules and all is working! outdated sare rules is not recommended, and openprotect do care ? :) if you update sare rules via sa

Keeping SA up to date

I've had an installation of SpamAssassin which I've been happy with for a number of years, its rulesets have been updated using Rules Du Jour. I've moved to a new server which has less rulesets installed and is catching less spam. The rulesets in this new installation are currently not

spamc and extra rules

I call spamc from various .procmail files (relating to different users) as below: | spamc I want to add some extra rules for one of these users. From the spamc docs I thought I'd have to replace this with : | spamc -F /path/to/file but this didn't seem to have any effect. Is this the

Problems with sa-update

I've previously used RDJ to keep my SA rules up-to-date but have got the impression I should be using sa-update instead. My first step was to run sa-update service spamassassin restart but this gave the following error: IO::Zlib version 1.04 required--this is only version 1.01 at

Re: Problems with sa-update

On 10/05/2008 18:40, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2008 18:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [21292] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.01 find where this is installed: rpm -qa | grep IO-Zlib rpm -e IO-Zlib-1.01 (only if its there) i do not know if its really

Unknown option: a when restarting spamd

I've recently moved from calling spamassasin to using spamc/spamd. Today I had a /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart fail with the message Unknown option: a. Googling this led me to the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin and /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd files, both of which specified the a option (the former

Re:

Richard Collyer wrote: Andreas Walter wrote: unsubscribe end Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe. Good luck, I'm still here a week after first trying to unsubscribe! ;-)

Unsubscribing from SA Users

I'm loath to post this message but I can't manage to unsubscribe! First of all, I sent a blank mail from this address (i.e. the subscribed address) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as indicated by the relevent header in each mail I receive from the list: list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This

RE: Unsubscribing from SA Users

To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Unsubscribing from SA Users On Monday 17 July 2006 12:53, Geoff Soper took the opportunity to write: It also suggested looing for a Return-Path: header but this header doesn't exist in any of the mails I receive from the list. If it doesn't exist

Re: Warnings in procmail log

jdow wrote: From: Geoff Soper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I'm getting the following three warning in my procmail log (machine name removed, just in case!), I assume I'm missing some configuration somewhere but don't know where! Can someone advise? Thanks, Geoff [8162] warn: config: cannot write

Re: Warnings in procmail log

Bart Schaefer wrote: On 7/8/06, Geoff Soper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .qmail contains the lines: | true ./Maildir/ Caveat: I don't use qmail, and don't even particularly like qmail, so what I'm about to say are really educated guesses rather than definitive answers. which I've altered

Warnings in procmail log

Hi, I'm getting the following three warning in my procmail log (machine name removed, just in case!), I assume I'm missing some configuration somewhere but don't know where! Can someone advise? Thanks, Geoff [8162] warn: config: cannot write to //.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such file or

Mortgage spam

About half of the false negatives I now get concern mortgage offers. Currently I have the following rulesets installed and updated by rules de jour. SARE_ADULT SARE_GENLSUBJ0 SARE_HEADER0 SARE_HTML0 SARE_OEM SARE_RANDOM SARE_RATWARE SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_SPOOF SARE_BML EVILNUMBERS Are there any

Perl problems with getting SA to run

I'm having a problem running SpamAssassin, it's not finding the Digest::SHA1 module. I've successfully installed this modules locally in /home/alphaworks/perl_modules: bash-2.05a$ find /home/alphaworks/perl_modules -name 'SHA1.pm' -print

Re: Perl problems with getting SA to run

Geoff Soper writes: bash-2.05a$ perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1) configuration: .. @INC: /home/alphaworks/perl_modules/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/ /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1 /usr/lib/perl5

Re: Problem installing SpamAssassin 3.0.2

Geoff Soper wrote: I run SpamAssassin on my web host's machine. I install it in my directory using: perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$HOME make make install My problem is that my host doesn't have the Digest::SHA1 module installed. I don't have the ability to install Perl modules centrally but I

Problem installing SpamAssassin 3.0.2

I run SpamAssassin on my web host's machine. I install it in my directory using: perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$HOME make make install My problem is that my host doesn't have the Digest::SHA1 module installed. I don't have the ability to install Perl modules centrally but I can install the module

RE: Problem installing SpamAssassin 3.0.2

suggestions appreciated! Thanks, Geoff New host? Your ISP shouldn't have any problems installing modules like that. Gary From: Geoff Soper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 1/1/2005 10:50 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Problem installing

And mortgages too

Further to my previous message, are there any rulesets which will handle all these mortgage spams which pretend to be following up previous correspondance? Thanks, Geoff

Watches and pain relief

My current spam problem consists almost entirely of spam advertising watches and various pain relief products. I have a reasonable variety of rulesets installed including the following (it's not definitive as I don't have access to the server right now): SARE General Subject SARE HEADER SARE html0

List options?

I've just rejoined the list after leaving it a while ago. Can someone point me in the direction of some list options such as setting digest mode, suspending my subscription and leaving the list? I didn't receive a welcome message from the list, I can't see anything at

RE: List options?

-Original Message- From: Geoff Soper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:30 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: List options? I've just rejoined the list after leaving it a while ago. Can someone point me in the direction of some list options