Buzz,
When I try to run spamassassin I get the following error:
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: Jun 18 05:08:09.140 [21543]
warn:
server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create INET
socket on
127.0.0.1:783: Cannot assign requested address
Looks like SpamAssassin
Alex,
Perhaps a question for the dev list, but I've just pulled the latest
version from svn, r1603656, according to the output of svn.
Should be alright. The Subversion database of ASF is common to multiple
projects, so revision numbers do monotonically increase, but not
every number
Walter,
I'm getting this:
eval failed: available_nameservers: No DNS servers available!
I do have nameservers available, and Net::DNS is installed,
so I'm a bit stuck.
Is the file /etc/resolv.conf readable by user running spamd?
Does it contain valid 'nameserver' entries?
Running spamd (or
Walter,
Thanks for the response. I'm actually not using spamc/spamd; just
running
spamassassin from procmail. But anyway, /etc/resolv.conf is world
readable and contains valid nameserver entries.
No, I'm not running it in a chrooted environment of any kind.
There are no dns directive in my
Jun 17 21:10:28.016 [832] dbg: dns: servers obtained from Net::DNS :
Jun 17 21:10:28.016 [832] dbg: dns: eval failed:
available_nameservers:
No DNS servers available!
This is the crux.
I can now reproduce the problem, checking ...
Mark
I can now reproduce the problem, checking ...
Mark
Looks like a change in Net::DNS 0.76, which no longer has a field
$res-{nameserver}, but has now fields nameserver4 and nameserver6,
with an official access method $res-nameservers.
--- Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm.orig 2014-05-07
If you want to implement a similar effect to the new yahoo and
aol DMARC policy by SpamAssassin, use rules similar to the
default rules in 60_adsp_override_dkim.cf:
adsp_override yahoo.com custom_med
adsp_override yahoo.com.ar custom_med
adsp_override yahoo.com.au custom_med
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Periodically, I'm finding dns: SA info lines coming from Amavis via SA.
I'm not clear why these are triggered, and only for a few of the many
thousands of emails processed per day. Insight appreciated,
I'm running 3.4.0. An example:
May 1 04:13:15 edge01
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=83451
Thanks! I see your suggested fix was rejected. :/ My takeaway from
the comment is that SA needs to handle the alarms better when it comes
to Net::DNS?
I think they just didn't fully understand the issue, or they don't care.
The only thing
On 04/30/2014 10:10 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
Are there any plans for a DMARC plugin for SpamAssassin?
Reacting to a
DMARC policy of reject (AOL/Yahoo) seems only feasible with
SpamAssassin because so many exceptions are needed for
software which
destryes DKIM signatures:
I
I agree that a DMARC SpamAssassin plugin would be valuable.
Michael Storz wrote:
How about implementing it in Amavisd-new in addition (I couldn't
resist to ask here too :-)
I think it more naturally fits into SpamAssassin, contributing
to the final score on equal terms with other rules. Also,
Robert Nicholson wrote:
My first attempt an integrating 3.4.0 (hopefully to solve the
DnsResolver.pm Invalid Argument issue) ends up with
Subroutine NetAddr::IP::STORABLE_freeze redefined at
/usr/local/lib64/perl5/NetAddr/IP.pm line 362.
at /usr/local/lib64/perl5/NetAddr/IP.pm line 362.
Dieter Braun wrote:
# sa-update
rules: failed to run T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method check_equal_from_domains via package
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus at (eval 1008) line 97.
You are missing a line:
loadplugin
Walter Hurry wrote:
I'm trying to get started with SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 9.2.
This is SpamAssassin 3.3.2, as that's the version in the FreeBSD ports.
SpamAssassin is installed with all its dependencies, but when I run
sa-update (as root),
I get the following output:
Can't load
psychobyte,
I'm trying to do some filtering on the originating IP address of a
message using a custom plugin on SA-3.3.2-r1
I have this variable set in my .cf file(same as trusted networks var):
awl_ignore_networks143.31/16 69.21/16 10.0.1/24
I've declared my awl_ignore_networks like
2014-02-18, Jason Haar wrote:
We have a geographically distributed edge mail relay network (some in
the US and some in Europe) and I'm wondering if the new REDIS support
could be used to centralize our Bayes?
If you have a fast and reliable connection between the two,
then in principle it
On 2/12/2014 11:53 AM, jpff wrote:
I got the same error installing via cpan. Trouble is I do not know
where the other system is or how to find it. There are a number of
Util.pm files ll over the place.
This is on a debian system but not really using their package
This should get rid of
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
Util.pm and AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read it you have found a bug, with i created a ticket for
I have a Debian-System on Jessie/Sid and sa-update is not working
root@falstaff:~# su debian-spamd -c sa-update -D --gpghomedir
/var/lib/spamassassin/sa-update-keys
Jan 28 09:30:32.570 [27955] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2
Jan 28 09:30:32.570 [27955] dbg: generic: Perl 5.018002,
Inkove it the same as I've done for years:
sa-learn --spam -f spambox --mbox
$ sa-learn --help
-f file Read list of files/directories from file
so what is in your file 'spambox' ?
Mark
$ sa-learn --help
-f file Read list of files/directories from file
so what is in your file 'spambox' ?
That contains the mailbox file with about 30 spam messages I'm trying to
learn.
So you get what you asked for.
Use --mbox instead of -f.
Mark
Andy Jezierski wrote:
Tried doing an sa-learn on some spam messages that didn't get flagged
as
such and am receiving the following error:
archive-iterator: no access to ... : File name too long at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.18/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm
line 891.
Learned
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Dear list, since this week there are tons of very good forged bills
that look like real, from big companies like telekom, vodafone, etc.
They look like the original, and just the link in the middle, where it
says download your bill here, goes to a site containing trojans.
Andy Jezierski writes:
Are there any instructions in setting up the Bayes DB using a Redis
server?
Yes, in release notes (currently also in build/announcements/PROPOSED-3.4.0.txt
in svn). Pretty much exactly as you already have it.
I've installed the server, took the sample config options
me writes:
Note that bayes_token_ttl and bayes_seen_ttl have no effect
on entries loaded from a backup dump, they are all given
a 'current' timestamp (with some random offset so that they
will not expire at exactly the same time). But for a steady-state,
with these *_ttl settings you can
2014-01-13 08:49, Andreas Schulze wrote:
thanks for that great software. The only problem I found is an issue
with sa-update:
My network require to use a http proxy incl. authentication. To load
updates
I currently (sa-3.3.2) set HTTP_PROXY=... for sa-update.
That does not work anymore in 3.4
Wolfgang writes:
what would be the minimum version of perl required to upgrade?
For features that already existed in 3.3 I believe the requirement
for version of perl has not changed, should work with 5.8.2 or later,
possibly even with 5.8.0 (perhaps with some Unicode-related problems).
If
Mike,
I have a problem with a rule on a newly installed relay on which --lint
throws a warning on an old local rule, squawking about Variable length
lookbehind not implemented. I simplified the rule trying to discover
the problem and it seems to be with the /i modifier:
This rule does
OpenBSD's spamd(8) is a SPAM deferral daemon, implementing greylisting,
DNS-based RBL lists, tarpitting etc ( http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/ ).
It is commonly deployed along with a pf packet filter (OpenBSD's firewall),
adjusting its tables dynamically.
Despite its name, spamd is not related or
On 10/14/2013 03:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail wrote on Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:14:02 -0400:
Preferably a perl module IO::Socket::IP is used (if it is available) for
network communication regardless of a protocol family - for DNS queries,
by spamd server side, and by a client code in
Andreas Schulze wrote:
thanks for that great software first!
I found two minor issues in perl documentation and attach a patch.
There is an other documentation issue in Conf.pm (found by debian lintian):
W: spamassassin: manpage-has-errors-from-man
On Sunday 13 October 2013 15:17:40 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
There doesn't seem to be a package perl-IO-Socket-IP available from
any repo.
On Debian (and raspbian) it's called libio-socket-ip-perl,
on FreeBSD it is net/p5-IO-Socket-IP. Don't know about others.
I don't know where the program fetch
On Friday 09 August 2013 00:26:09 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Ok, so I imagine I want to do something like:
header DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD eval:check_dkim_adsp('D')
but only for facebook.com... I don't see exactly how I tie those two
together?
==
To add POSITIVE spam score
On Friday 09 August 2013 01:13:38 Benny Pedersen wrote:
seen idn spamming urls here that is not tested in uridnsbl, have
spamassassin 3.4.0 not idn support yet ?
is it just missing tld defines for idn domains ?
should it be filled a bug ?
There is currently (3.4.0) no specific IDN support
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 17:48:47 Kareem Dana wrote:
I am using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on FreeBSD 9.1. I'd just like to confirm that
I can pipe messages to sa-learn. The following commands should do the same
thing, correct?
# cat spammail | sa-learn --spam
# sa-learn --spam spammail
Yes, it
On Saturday 22 June 2013 07:06:43 The Doctor wrote:
Tweaking needed
Test Summary Report
t/bayesdbm_flock.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 48 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 39
t/sa_check_spamd.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 7 Failed: 5)
Failed tests: 1, 3-6
t/spamc_B.t
On Saturday 22 June 2013 15:15:20 The Doctor wrote:
So how can we test on such platform?
2) NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD are akin so some testers
might be available.
It is regularly in use on FreeBSD (7.2, 8.2, and 9.1),
it has been tested on OpenBSD 5.2, and some time ago
on NetBSD
This is not a formal announcement, but an invitation to a broader
users community to try the release candidate of the coming release
of Apache SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 .
Preliminary release notes and a link to the package was published
in a posting to the d...@spamassassin.apache.org mailing
Simon,
I looked at scoring for an email on an SA installation and noticed
differences between hand scanning with spamc and scanning with spamd. My
manually scanned email hit CLAMAV sane security, (ignore Bayes because
the user had Bayes process this and then asked me about this), whilst
this
My spamd tasks are using 100M to 300M each. Seems excessive.
That's about normal for a 64-bit perl with current rulesets
plus some additions. The in-memory (RSS) footprint is
propbably 1/2 to 2/3 of that.
What can I do to reduce this?
On a 32-bit platform the virtual memory requirement is
On Sunday March 24 2013 05:57:49 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
sa-update also uses a mirror file which lists all of the URLs where the
update can be downloaded from, optionally including weights for different
mirrors.
But there's no documentation or examples given for weighting. Anyone
Missing the {hosts} part, which is now required in 3.4.0:
--- DecodeShortURLs.pm~ 2011-07-25 17:56:57.0 +0200
+++ DecodeShortURLs.pm 2013-03-07 03:27:24.0 +0100
What version of the plugin are you patching?
The last I could find in one of my old directories,
it
Yes, I am using DecodeShortURLs
I have it on both the 3.3.2 and 3.4 systems
Both show:
0.0 HAS_SHORT_URL Message contains one or more shortened URLs
So I guess the question is which one is running DecodeShortURLs correctly
3.4 or 3.3.2
Missing the {hosts} part, which is now
On Wednesday March 6 2013 01:06:22 Scott Ostrander wrote:
cd /usr/share/GeoIP
wget -N
http://geolite.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/GeoLiteCountry/GeoIP.dat.gz
gunzip GeoIP.dat.gz
Not to forget to download its IPv6 counterpart:
Another thing I'd like to do, if possible, is check to see if the From
address matches the return path and add to the spam score if they
do not match.
The inverse rule is already there (just use a meta rule negation of it):
header RP_MATCHES_RCVD eval:check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd()
describe
Axb wrote:
If you're using SA 3.4 trunk:
as temporary entry in local.cf
# ONLY FOR SA 3.4 or higher!!
dns_query_restriction deny njabl.org
Thanks for reminding us of the new feature!
Wrapped up in a conditional, for those wishing to switch between
versions while keeping the same .cf
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Just notcied sa-learn kick up a fuss with some files fed into
it from a user's HAM directory in a dovecot directory.
I put a copy of
the ham on http://pastebin.com/MLEhYsG7
Could you go to the SpamAssassin bugzilla and open a bug for this, and
attach the
Anirudha,
So what should be the ideal setup of running binaries. I want Amavis
running both Spamprotection and ANtivirus protection, hence i have below
process running in current production
1. Postfix MTA
2. Amavisd
3. Clamd
Should the spamd be running for spamprotection via amavis-new?
Anirudha,
I have a stable running setup of postfix after-queue using amavis-new
[currently using for content inspection and antivirus only] and would like
to use this for additional spam protection.
As i understand from the above comments to my query, i dont need to run the
'spamd' as
Anirudha Patil wrote:
I have a MTA setup of [Postfix + Amavis-new + ClamAV + Spamassasin] of
which only the spamassasin part is disabled. Now i wish to enable the
Spamcontrol part.
But after enabling the spamassasin option in amavis-new, it shows the below
mentioned error.
*(!!)SA
Anirudha,
My Setup details:
Postfix version: 2.7.3
Amavis-new version : 2.6.4-4
Spamassasin version : SpamAssassin version 3.0.1
running on Perl version 5.8.5
The get_tag method was only made public with version of SpamAssassin
3.0.3, which was about 8 years ago! You need a
Anirudha,
Thank you Mark for the nice explanation. Just one question, can i upgrade
my spamassasin to latest and still use it with amavis-new 2.6.4 version or
does it also needs to be upgraded. Just that amavis required lots of
depencies.
Yes, I believe amavis-new 2.6.4 should be able to use
On Friday December 28 2012 10:47:58 john ffitch wrote:
Not sure I understand. As far as I am away I am running the latest
release
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.10.1
If it matters, Debian i486, installed from CPAN
Kevin What version of Net::DNS are you using?
Ralph,
Am I perhaps experiencing DNS issues?
BTW, I'm using dev-perl/Net-DNS-0.700.0, so the thread
sa-update don't update of 2012-12-13 probably does not apply?
It does apply. Go for Net::DNS 0.71, or stick with 0.68.
Net::DNS 0.69 and 0.70 are incompatible with sa-update from
SpamAssassin
Illegal octal digit '8' ignored at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/BodyRuleBaseExtractor.pm
line 1083
This is more likely a bug 6336:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6336
fixed in 3.3.2.
Mark
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Mark Martinec wrote:
Illegal octal digit '8' ignored at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/BodyRuleBaseExtractor.pm
line 1083
This is more likely a bug 6336:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6336
fixed in 3.3.2.
Oops, sorry, apparently
Victor,
I just installed spamassassin on FreeBSD
FreeBSD Kratos.strelna 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3
Dec 13 12:14:49.560 [78833] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2
Dec 13 12:14:49.560 [78833] dbg: generic: Perl 5.014002,
Dec 13 12:14:49.579 [78833] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version:
Michael, could you please fold-in the above (or similar)
patch to FreeBSD port mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
Here is the 'patch-bug6872' patch file, suitable for inclusion
in the /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/files/
directory of FreeBSD ports:
--- sa-update.raw (revision 1421187)
+++
Dec 13 12:29:40.402 [22852]
dbg: *dns: 2.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 3.3, parsed as 3*
See the other thread of today: sa-update don't update.
Mark
Help. sa-update is jammed.
What should I do?
rules: failed to run __KAM_BODY_LENGTH_LT_256 test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method check_body_length via package
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus at (eval 1114) line 419.
etc. etc.
Just got a report from another source, fixed it
Piotr,
We noticed a big increase in user CPU utilization on our MX servers since
Sep 2nd sa-update. On a typical day we process over 2 million emails on
our mail cluster. Our debugging has so far isolated the problem to:
1) iXhash was a problem module, so we disabled it (the remote location
Rob,
Because bayes_seen was also quite big I read up on that too.
Since the table doesn't include any age information and (most)
everything I found says just delete it, I emptied the table.
Although I think it's strange to just throw away information about
previous seen messages that have
I guess what we are looking for is a plugin that can take a list of
commonly abused domains known to have valid SPF records or valid DKIM
signatures, and to be able to apply a (stronger) score to those messages
that fail the SPF and/or DKIM test.
Several common domains that do provide a
Ori,
RFC 5321, section 4.4 has a BNF description of a Received: header.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.4
Thank you, although I wonder where the definition of Protocol
With = CFWS WITH FWS Protocol
Protocol = ESMTP / SMTP / Attdl-Protocol
Benny,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-0.1, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=1.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NO_X_MAILER=0.1] autolearn=no
ALL_TRUSTED does not disable DKIM_ADSP_ALL
Why would an ALL_TRUSTED be disabling an ADSP test???
Trust
Franz Schwartau writes:
Yesterday we received an e-mail which hits DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD,
DKIM_SIGNED and DKIM_VALID from ebay_inv...@survey.ebay.com.
60_adsp_override_dkim.cf lists:
adsp_override *.ebay.com
survey.ebay.com signs their e-mails with ebay.com (please see the
attachments for
Mozafar,
Spamassassin version: 3.3.0
OS: Debian Lenny
SA called by Amavis through its command, so NOT using spamc/spamd.
I've two separate servers: One contains SMTP/IMAP/POP3 servers and
(virtual) user maildirs. And another has Amavisd-new along with
SpamAssassin and anti-virus
Hello SpamAssassin users,
Does anyone out there have any information regarding two purported styles
for SpamAssassin operation - ACL and TRANSPORT?
I was recently made aware of this distinction but after searching for a
couple days, I am unable to find any further details nor any
Antonio,
Hi Mark - you guessed…
So SpamAssassin was working great - still does actually - except that for
some reason, about 2 weeks ago, the subject line rewrite stopped working.
I then embarked on a journey to figure out why. Here's what I've
learned\been told thus far:
1) This change
Toni,
recently, my spamassassin started to score system messages as spam,
mentioning IP numbers not in the email:
[...]
* 2.0 CHECK_SPAMHAUS_ZEN RBL: SPAMHAUS_ZEN: IP is listed in Spamhaus'
* ZEN list
* [91.0.104.164 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
* 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL:
BusinessWeek infographic:
Behind the drug advertisements in your inbox is a multimillion-dollar
mail-order pharmaceutical business; By Karen Weise
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/spam-works-12082011-gfx.html
Felipe,
FreeBSD + Qmail + Vpopmail
maillog:
Dec 1 10:40:46 mail spamd[67490]:
spamd: got connection over /var/run/spamd.socket
*Dec 1 10:40:46 mail spamd[67490]:
spamd: handle_user unable to find user: 'x...@xxx.com'*
Dec 1 10:40:46 mail spamd[67490]: spamd: checking message
Felipe,
FreeBSD + Qmail + Vpopmail
*Dec 1 10:40:46 mail spamd[67490]:
spamd: handle_user unable to find user: 'x...@xxx.com'*
A username 'x...@xxx.com' does not exist. Either you should not
pass the full recipient's e-mail address in the -u argument to spamc
but use a localpart
I have set up DKIM on our corporate mail hosted by GMail. Google
assigned a TXT record and our DNS-provider set it.
I send a mail from GMail from the Web UI and from my Thunderbird to
myself, and SA always triggers that rule.
What does it mean? Is not valid?
Whatever of mail reaches
A concept of 'ongoing conversation' or 'replied to' is implemented as
a 'pen pals' feature in amavisd, when it is used in place of spamd
to call SpamAssassin. The idea is to automatically contribute some negative
spam score points to ongoing conversations - based on envelope sender
and recipients,
For some reason, spamassassin thinks that 0/0 is trusted, even after my
most strenuous attempts to dissuade it:
$ grep _networks /etc/spamassassin/*
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:# trusted_networks 212.17.35.
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:clear_trusted_networks
Alex,
No, the DKIM_VERIFIED (or rather: DKIM_VALID, as it is now called)
Shouldn't then L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL be updated to rely upon DKIM_VALID
instead of the deprecated DKIM_VERIFIED?
Yes, definitely, if still in use. Where did you find it, it's not
one of the stock rules. Probably posted
Alex,
Then shouldn't it just be eliminated as a rule entirely? There are
also rules that apparently depend on it:
Oct 31 14:22:58.055 [2067] info: rules: meta test L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL
has dependency 'DKIM_VERIFIED' with a zero score
It looks like perhaps it's there for legacy reasons? From
Alex,
(sorry for my previous post, sent prematurely)
Then shouldn't it just be eliminated as a rule entirely? There are
also rules that apparently depend on it:
No, the DKIM_VERIFIED (or rather: DKIM_VALID, as it is now called)
(with a near-zero score) is valuable for two reasons: in
I did run sa-update, all it says (put it in verbose mode) is that
the rules are up to date.
Initially it did download the rules into
/var/lib/spamassassin/version/more subdirs.
Those files are still there, but spamd is,
apparently, not seeing them.
Start 'spamassassin' from a command
On Wednesday August 10 2011 21:49:41 tonjg wrote:
I'm running spamassassin.i386 version 3.3.1-3.el4.rf on centos 4.8 (raq4
server) and I can't get SA to log to syslog. I understand the SA log
defaults to mail but my mail log doesn't show any SA activity.
# spamd -s /var/log/spamd.log
Aug 10
Steve,
I'm using a (mostly vanilla) Postfix/Amvisd configuration...
[...]
If you look at your mail logs, do you actually see 9 messages being
received?
I thought I did, but - now - I'm not so sure... because the log doesn't
match the messages I find via IMAP. (Really!)
I've attached a
On Wednesday August 10 2011 16:40:26 Michael Scheidell wrote:
So, we open a bugzilla and put 169.254* addresses into 'local_networks'
by default? like rfc1918?
it the example, sa sees the internal (trusted) 172* ip, and sees 'first
untrusted' (the 169* address!)
spf fails, rbls are consulted.
Ned,
On the same basis that some DNSWLs have high, medium and low scores
depending upon the level of trust, I'm wondering if it would be useful
to have user defined high, medium and low scores available to rules such
as whitelist_from_dkim and whitelist_from_spf so mail admins can score
On Thursday July 28 2011 11:30:33 Jason Ede wrote:
Even with auto_expiry off the system is still running really slow for a
remote server... The local server bayes updates go through really quickly,
but the remote servers queries are still backing up...
i.e. from slow query log just now...
Jason,
Yes I have 3.3.2 so I've made that change as it seems to make a lot of
sense to me.
However, I think that will just slow down the rate of learns and it will
still snarl up at busy times?
True.
I don't have a better answer for your original question on a slowdown.
There may be some
Shane,
Thanks Mark,
We are using Amavisd to call SpamAssassin. Cacti looks great, we hope to
implement Cacti soon.
Thanks for the info, and many thanks for Amavisd.
Btw, for more info search the release notes (the feature was introduced
in 2.6.4) for the following text:
- newly supplied
Michael,
since hotels.com has started to dkim sign their spam, email, I would
like to unwhitelist their 'spam' from lines.
Yes, it is nice to get hotels.com reservation acks without them being
marked as spam, but maybe if they abuse the privledge, we revoke it.
found this in sa 3.3.2
Shane,
We would like to start monitoring our two smtp servers. They are fairly
busy boxes, maybe 100,000 messages a day, give or take several thousand.
They of course run Spamassassin, Postfix is also used. We use MRTG to
monitor internal servers and switches, and would really like something
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:40:51 -0500, Max Dunlap wrote:
Hey guys, I followed https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PostfixAmavisNew
to get Spamassasin working with some virus checking. I'm getting
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new in my headers but no
X-Spam-Status: No
Any ideas?
Benny Pedersen
Yves,
Btw, this Cc should be arriving over IPv6 too...
Sorry, it's here indeed. And Botnet has caught it again. :(
Some of the headers:
Received: from mail.ijs.si ([2001:1470:ff80::25])
by dotforward.de with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from mark.martinec...@ijs.si)
On 28/06/2011 11:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Now I'm seeing these error messages in the logs:
Issuing rollback() due to DESTROY without explicit disconnect() of
DBD::mysql::db handle
I'm beginning to wonder if MySQL bays actually works. I'm just geeing
too many strange errors.
Which
On Wednesday June 29 2011 21:59:52 Yves Goergen wrote:
On 29.06.2011 21:03 CE(S)T, Yves Goergen wrote:
Could somebody please just send me a message from an IPv6
mail server to my address? (Preferably from a host that should not be
caught by Botnet...)
[...]
Doesn't seem to work. It's a
Dave,
[Bug 6624] BayesStore/MySQL.pm fails to update tokens due to
MySQL server bug (wrong count of rows affected)
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6624
[Bug 6625] Bayes SQL schema treats bayes_token.token as char
instead of binary, fails chset checks
Michael,
I have uploaded a test port for anyone who wants to try it.
http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa332_unofficial.tgz
Great, thanks!
anyone think of any other critical patches (as long as they are not
documentation, or os specific), let me know.
Yes, I believe the Bug 6624:
Michael,
I can prepare a minimalistic workaround patch, the basic idea is
to just treat a row count 3 the same as count value 2.
i put the official patch in place at 1:46pm edt.
so, I think I am good to go, and will be sending this to freebsd ports
maintainers.
Too late, but no
Dave (and others),
dbg: bayes: error inserting token for line: t 1 0 1308114254 4fd2b3f2f0
dbg: bayes: _put_token: Updated an unexpected number of rows.
I have opened three bug entries, the first one is directly in response
to this problem report and brings a fix:
[Bug 6624]
On Wednesday June 22 2011 01:25:36 Benny Pedersen wrote:
since so many have problems i share my mysql shemas :=)
`token` binary(5) NOT NULL,
Yes, the binary or varbinary is the key to a solution here.
Mucking with utf-8 vs latin-1 is just covering but not solving
the most glaring problem
Dave,
dbg: bayes: error inserting token for line: t 1 0 1308114254
4fd2b3f2f0 dbg: bayes: _put_token: Updated an unexpected number
of rows. [repeats ...]
Which version of MySQL?
Did you remember to replace TYPE=MyISAM with TYPE=InnoDB in the
schema (according to README.bayes) if you are
Benny,
missing meta on DKIM_VALID when DKIM_ADSP_ALL ?
header testing ___DKIM_ADSP_ALL eval:test()
meta DKIM_ADSP_ALL (__DKIM_ADSP_ALL !DKIM_VALID)
or is it just checking with DKIM_VALID_AU ?
how to solve it ?
Not sure I understand the question.
The DKIM_ADSP_ALL rule as distributed
101 - 200 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
