On Thursday 07 October 2010 11:46:58 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.10.10 11:11, Shlomi Fish wrote:
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from this
list should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom
of their messages.
They have
Hi,
I have the uricountry and relaycountry plugins active on a 3.3.1 SA.
how would i make a rule that scores for mails that contain an url
under the TLD .xx but haven't gone through at least one relay in the
same country?
how would I make a rule that scores for mails that contain an URL that
Am Montag 29 März 2010 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 16:23 -0400, Brent Kennedy wrote:
Wow, I knew this was coming at some point. I just figured it was
too expensive.
You did read the entire thread, right? :) There's nothing new
about this. Moreover, this still is a
I'm trying to get the 3.3.1 source frm the website, but so far all mirrors
replied file not found...
what's up with that?
bye,
MH
Am Freitag, 26. März 2010 10:27:41 schrieb Daniel Lemke:
Mathias Homann wrote:
I'm trying to get the 3.3.1 source frm the website, but so far all
mirrors replied file not found...
what's up with that?
bye,
MH
Hm for me too...
But you can still get it from CPAN:
http
Am Donnerstag 04 Februar 2010 schrieb Christoph Lehmann:
Hey List,
is there a simple way to stop further checks after achieving a
specified number of points?
I don't think that would make sense, since the later checks might
actually bring the total down.
just imagine the whitelist_from
Am Dienstag 26 Januar 2010 schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
It's all because
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
headerSARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2010 08:50:54 schrieb Per Jessen:
Mathias Homann wrote:
... is a fix for that out through sa-update now?
then why am i not getting it?
my channels for sa-update:
saupdates.openprotect.com
updates.spamassassin.org
70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net
I
Am Montag 04 Januar 2010 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, babydr wrote:
Hello All , My main ? is how was this (see below(*)) email being
caught by the FH_DATE_PAST_20XX . I've run the sa_update
repeatedly (of course that was useless as crontab had already
ran) and with '-D' I
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2009 02:33:27 schrieb drkwc:
New Spamassassin nb qs:
On the configuration panel, I have SpamAssassin set to mark as spam any
email scoring 5 or above.
I have a rule set in Outlook Express to route those to a SpamAssassin SPAM
folder.
Now, I'm wondering, can I
Hi all,
I have a postfix-amavisd-new-postfix-cyrus imapd through deliver chain up
and running, and amavisd-new faithfully uses clamav to scan for viruses.
I also have a working spamassassin / spamd with dcc and razor2 and all the
toppings, on the same host, with sql-based settings, AWL and
Hi,
which good/useful sa-update channels should i use, in addition to these:
saupdates.openprotect.com
updates.spamassassin.org
70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net
thanks for any suggestions
MH
--
Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1
UWG und
Hey folks,
is it just me or did the average spam per day count drop by 75%
lately?
bye,
MH
--
gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77 DE37 D184 C5F9 B013 44E7 27BD
763C
Am Dienstag, 10. Juni 2008 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
On Dienstag, 10. Juni 2008 peter pilsl wrote:
I run spamassassin 3.2.3 and every few weeks a new wave of german
SPAM hits our servers that are not detected by spamassassin...
Is there a webpage where I can get new rules? or any channel
Hi,
lately i'm getting a lot of spam with rather low scores under 12.0
meaning that trash is not automatically deleted by my sieve filter).
Here's a set of headers:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([unix socket])
by celebrimbor (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA;
Hi,
I'm running the following mail chain:
fetchmail - postfix - clamsmtpd - postfix - spamassassin 3.1.7 (as
local_transport via the spamdeliver python script that came with the
spamassassin sources) - cyrus imapd (where spam gets sorted out based on its
score).
now, since a few days, i keep
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 09:56:29 schrieb Mathias Homann:
now, since a few days, i keep getting the same spam mail several times a
day, which has _no_ spamassassin headers at all, as if it has found a way
_around_ my spamassassin.
by the way... when i run that offending mail manually
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 10:37:51 schrieb David Goldsmith:
Check your mail log for error messages like this one:
spamd[12960]: prefork: server reached --max-children setting, consider
raising it
We've been running spamd with '-m8' (max children spawned) for quite
sometime and all of a
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 16:12:59 schrieb Matt Kettler:
Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
I'm running the following mail chain:
fetchmail - postfix - clamsmtpd - postfix - spamassassin 3.1.7 (as
local_transport via the spamdeliver python script that came with the
spamassassin sources
Am Freitag 23 Februar 2007 schrieb Mathias Homann:
Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 16:12:59 schrieb Matt Kettler:
Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
I'm running the following mail chain:
fetchmail - postfix - clamsmtpd - postfix - spamassassin 3.1.7 (as
local_transport via the spamdeliver
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 19:28 schrieb san:
Hi,
Is there any rule to stop mails which has .Gif attachment in SA 2.64.
Yes, upgrade to 3.1.7.
bye,
MH
--
Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1
UWG und 823 I BGB (Beschluß des LG Berlin
Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 03:53 schrieb Matt Kettler:
Yep - they are using normal email technology.
No they're not. They're falsifying mail headers. Something last I
checked was actually illegal in the united states under CAN-SPAM.
and a russian criminal sitting in litavia, using his
Hi,
I'm running spamassassin 3.1.7 on a redhat box that is not an endpoint mta but
sort of an
inbetween mta between our external MX and several internal machines.
So, most of the mails that spamd sees on it have recipient adresses that are
not local users,
but still valid, which leads to AWL
Am Montag, 11. Dezember 2006 23:41 schrieb Bret Miller:
So perhaps SPF should consider removing +all as an option.
Realisticly anyone that has to say my e-mail might come from
anywhere is contributing to the problem and probably deserves to
have e-mail bounced.
sounds like a possible SA
Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 05:09 schrieb Steve Thomas:
Is anyone else getting tired of this? Forty eight messages on the
SA list today that have nothing to do with SA. What's the point of
having a topical mailing list if nobody cares that the discussion
is off-topic?
if you're so opposed
Noel Jones schrieb:
* NEVER * use sendmail -t to reinject mail coming from the network.
Doing so will send mail to everyone listed in the To: header, which
doesn't have anything to do with who should receive the mail.
As the guide said, use sendmail -oi -f ${sender} -- ${recipient}.
[...]
Hi,
I'm trying to use spamassassin 3.1.7 from within postfix 2.2.10 on a redhat ES4
server,
(loosely) following the directions in
http://www.debuntu.org/postfix-and-pamassassin-how-to-filter-spam (loosely,
because 1. its
redhat and nbot ubuntu, and 2. there's a kaspersky antivirus involved as
Hi,
ohw can it be that the attached spam got through... the SA report
says user in whitelist, thus it gave the spam a really high
negative score. How can that be, or rather, how can i stop it?
bye,
MH
--- spam starts here ---
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Am Montag, 1. Mai 2006 21:18 schrieb :
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I
have ever used was RAV. Until is was bought out by Microsoft. I
have since been using ClamAV but it sure uses allot of RAM.
What do you use?
clamav.
clamd uses some 2.8% of my ram
Am Dienstag, 11. April 2006 22:28 schrieb mouss:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss wrote:
I would conjecture that most legitimate mail has two real hops
(the sending MTA and the receiving MTA).
That would be one hop.
depends on how you count:
MUA - my MTA1 - your MTA - your
Am Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 23:46 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 17:15 Stewart, John wrote:
Aye; thanks. Unfortunately, our current external DNS server
doesn't yet support SPF records. =(
let me rant a bit about SPF records.
Background info: my day job is fondling
Hi folks,
since i've been running spamassassin, and doing daily logfile stats
via spamstats.pl 0.6b, I was used to getting somewhat near 50% spam
(meaning, half of around 500 mails per day were tagged as spam by
spamassassin), but lately, maybe since a month or so, the daily
percentage has
Hi,
i want spamassassin not to touch my mails at all.
server in question runs SA with mysql for user config.
reason: i fetch with fetchmail from there, and run my own SA on my own mail
server.
how do i tell SA on the other server not to touch my mails at all?
SA is invoked from within qmail
Bowie Bailey wrote:
how do i tell SA on the other server not to touch my mails at all?
SA is invoked from within qmail there.
You would have to tell qmail not to invoke SA for your messages.
But why is it a problem? When you run SA on your server, it should
automatically remove the
Am Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 20:27 schrieb Chris Santerre:
--Chris (A lazy american wondering when the heck the second advent
is? )
last sunday.
advent: the four last sundays before christmas eve.
so, coming sunday will be 3rd advent.
bye,
MH
--
gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77
Hi,
i want to automate my spam handling a bit further.
here's what i got by now:
- fetchmail gets mails from various pop3 accounts, injects into local mail
system (postfix)
- postfix pushes mail through clamsmtp and then through spamassassin
- mail gets delivered into local cyrus imap which
Noc Phibee wrote:
Hi
a small question :
Do you know if they have a utility for create a entry into mrtg
for count spamassassin result ?
you might want to use munin instead of mrtg, it comes with spamassassin
monitoring
preconfigured... and it does other useful monitors as well.
bye,
MH
Hi,
at work, someone dropped a flyer about the product mentioned in the subject on
my desk...
seems to be one of those linux-based appliances, meaning, 1U rackmount box
running linux, a smtpd of unknown brand, a spam filter, and some f-prot based
mail scanner...
the leaflet itself is full
Am Mittwoch, 23. November 2005 23:11 schrieb jdow:
From: Mathias Homann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the ProofPoint Spam Detection (TM) module uses the ProofPoint
MLX(TM) technology for automated learning (pat.pend.) which in
itself doesn't tell
Pierre Thomson wrote:
If you are trying to minimize the score for your own bulk mailing, then you
should be
I am not. I was just wondering about the scores that that mail has got, as well
as a bit
concerned about the fact that after upgrading to SA 3.1.0 i get all kind of
weird results,
Hi,
here's the headers of a mail that got scored (ok, not very high but it
should get no score at all):
Return-Path: XXX
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: XXX
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
celebrimbor.eregion.home
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2005 19:33 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A HREF=http://hacker.com;http://legit-bank.com/a
On top of my mind, I never saw a situation like this in real
life, except in phish emails.
I see this all the time in promotional emails (spam, not phish) to
track clickthrough.
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 08:38 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and
completely traceable to me. It has also never been involved in
sending spam. If the anti-spam community start misbehaving the
future is indeed bleak. ==John ffitch
if
Hi,
I have a good idea for a plugin/ruleset, where do i send it?
bye,
MH
--
gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77 DE37 D184 C5F9 B013 44E7 27BD
763C
Am Freitag, 21. Oktober 2005 14:48 schrieb Iain Smith:
One of the reports is the top n most triggered spam tests. Does
anyone know of an easy way to access the description of a test? I
was hoping perhaps I could load one of the SpamAssassin modules and
call a function, a la $desc =
Am Freitag, 21. Oktober 2005 17:57 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
I have a good idea for a plugin/ruleset, where do i send it?
users@spamassassin.apache.org is a good place to assess how useful
it would be to the community. Is this something you would write
Am Freitag, 21. Oktober 2005 18:52 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mathias Homann wrote:
anyways, I'd love to be able to give scores to a mail if its from
a given email address but it is not pgp signed.
Sounds like three rules should do the trick. Pseudo-rules follow:
_FROM_JOE: From address
47 matches
Mail list logo
