On 3/19/2014 1:44 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
--On March 19, 2014 9:58:29 -0400 Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 3/19/2014 5:14 AM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to disable awl (or at least score it 0.001) when a
special rule hit like:
if URIBL_DBL_SPAM
On 3/7/2013 1:51 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I received an email that was tagged with KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP, which
means it was listed in the Spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List.
However, I've checked every IP and domain in the email, and none are
listed on any spamhaus list, even as of a minute ago.
On 6/1/2011 10:37 AM, monolit wrote:
Hello,
I am a newbie in using Spamassassin. I need your help as for configuration
of spamassasin. I use Debian Lenny Spamassassin 3.2.5 and I want to change
database from Berkeley DB to SDBM (because this database was recommended me
on this forum).
1) I
On 2/4/2011 7:08 PM, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
I don't keep constant eye on the mail server logs but did notice that
pyzor was not working. I've ping the server that I've been using for
years:
# pyzor ping
82.94.255.100:24441 TimeoutError:
And see it is not
On 1/28/2011 5:28 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:00:02 -0500, Adam Moffett adamli...@plexicomm.net
wrote:
Is there any particular reason there can't be a reply-to: header added
by the listserv?
no its a mua problem to use list-post header when replying
In this case, the
On 1/31/2011 2:51 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 1/28/2011 5:28 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:00:02 -0500, Adam Moffett adamli...@plexicomm.net
wrote:
Is there any particular reason there can't be a reply-to: header added
by the listserv?
no its a mua problem to use list
On 12/19/2010 11:31 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Gentlemen, I wish there was a
whitelist_from *...@facebookmail.com
rule that would use the Return-Path field,
$ egrep '^(From|Return-Path):' a b
a:Return-Path: notification+zj4oo-6-6...@facebookmail.com
a:From: Facebook
On 9/18/2010 4:57 PM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
I have SA set up and working (mostly) on my mail machine, however I've put the
following into my user_prefs:
whitelist_from *...@zyngamail.com
and
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@zyngamail.com zyngamail.com
and
whitelist_allows_relays
On 9/10/2010 6:55 PM, Dennis German wrote:
Why does test TVD_APPROVED seem to have a score of
TVD_APPROVED 2.356 2.599 2.599 2.090
on page http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html
but the headers in my email show:
X-Spam-testscores:
On 9/7/2010 7:11 PM, William Taylor wrote:
I want to be able to only allow a certain email to be sent from one of several
hosts.
Currently im doing something like:
blacklist_from sa...@foo.com
whitelist_from_rcvd sa...@foo.com mail.foo.com
whitelist_from_rcvd sa...@foo.com sales.foo.com
On 9/2/2010 8:24 AM, Chris Datfung wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
Can you try again using a message, such as the sample-spam.txt
that comes with the SA tarball.
spamassassin sample-spam.txt 21 -D
On 9/2/2010 3:08 AM, Chris Datfung wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org
mailto:m...@junc.org wrote:
On ons 01 sep 2010 22:47:36 CEST, Chris Datfung wrote
header IN_NJABL_ORG
rbleval:check_rbl('njabl','dnsbl.njabl.org.')
describe
On 8/24/2010 1:13 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
For clarity: assuming your MTA inserts a Return-Path: header, or adds a
clause to the Received header about the envelope sender, whitelist_from_rcvd
will match against it, in addition to the From: header, and several other
from-like headers. (however
On 8/21/2010 1:27 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:16:58AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
You need to use _envelope_ sender (e.g. Return-Path), not From.
Never mind, I was confusing it with spf and read the docs..
For clarity: assuming your MTA inserts a Return-Path: header, or adds a
On 8/20/2010 9:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use whitelist_from_rcvd and it doesn't appear to be
working. I'm trying to whitelist mail from the AZ lottery. Here are
the headers from the email:
Received: from AZMTAQS01.AZ.GOV (azmtaprd01.az.gov [159.87.126.8])
From: Arizona
On 8/16/2010 10:53 PM, Mark Chaney wrote:
When run lint, im getting the following error:
Aug 16 21:47:16.112 [4457] dbg: config: mkdir /var/www/.spamassassin
failed: mkdir /var/www/.spamassassin: Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1853
Though i have no idea
On 8/16/2010 10:19 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote:
I gone throughhttp://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
Below is my version..
SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.5
running on Perl 5.8.8
with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.31)
with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.024)
I have two
On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Dennis German wrote:
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:...
due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x.
Can you please define demoted.
Changed from enabled by default to disabled by default,
On 8/11/2010 1:30 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettlermkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's a
script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
forever, even when stale. (there are no timestamps
On 7/23/2010 10:05 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On fre 23 jul 2010 04:49:40 CEST, Matt Kettler wrote
Fair enough... I was keying off Benny's suggestion to lower the score of
both ALL_TRUSTED and NO_RELAYS, the latter of which is never a good
sign.
as all in life it depends :=)
grep NO_RELAYS
On 7/20/2010 9:07 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 7/19/2010 8:23 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 7/16/2010 2:31 PM, Cliff Hayes wrote:
Hello,
Our webmail server is on the same server as sendmail and spamassassin.
I would like to filter outbound webmail but can't because the most recent
On 7/22/2010 10:32 AM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
Sometimes the AWL rule doesn't appear in the list.
That's correct.
At the very least, The AWL is a score averager, so the first message
from a given From: and source IP combination cannot be AWLed. This
definitely will cause a no-show. You need an
On 7/22/2010 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 7/22/10 10:32 AM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
Sometimes the AWL rule doesn't appear in the list. From looking at the
due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x.
It might not be worth the cpu cycles
Slight Correction: The
On 7/16/2010 2:31 PM, Cliff Hayes wrote:
Hello,
Our webmail server is on the same server as sendmail and spamassassin.
I would like to filter outbound webmail but can't because the most recent
versions of spamassassin have 127.0.0.1 trusted by default.
How can I override this? Or is that
On 7/14/2010 11:27 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC realspam.txt result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC realspam.txt result2.txt
WinSpamC realspam.txt result3.txt
result1: under 6.3
result2:
On 6/17/2010 8:02 AM, Gnanam wrote:
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote:
that will not give you the output you'd expect.
Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc
and feed this into SA.
How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any
standard/rule
On 6/9/2010 7:51 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
I maintain a mail cluster that gets about 70,000 messages a day per
node.
I'm just wondering if it's possible to decrease the scan times. In the
TOTALS section AvgTm is the average scantime in the spamassassin log
file:
(Delivered are messages that
On 6/9/2010 12:11 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Jun-2010, at 19:34, Matt Kettler wrote:
Legacy version, 3.2.5 (rarely updated)
Even better:
Unsupported version 3.2.5 (critical updates only)
or
Deprecated version: 3.2.5 (critical updates only, if at all)
Well, unsupported
On 6/8/2010 5:48 PM, James Ralston wrote:
On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates
*exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time.
3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent
On 6/8/2010 11:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
We also very loudly repeatedly state on the list that if you want to
keep abreast of the latest spam, you need to be running the latest
version of the codebase (can't take advantage of new features without
it!), but don't have that clearly
On 6/2/2010 8:45 AM, Gabor Illo wrote:
Can somebody know how can i disable this RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET?
It's correct?
echo score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
assuming that /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ is your site rules dir, yes.
If in doubt,
On 5/31/2010 10:51 AM, Dhaval Soni wrote:
Dear All,
I have installed MailScanner - 4.79 v with sendmail, spamassassin and
clamav on CentOS. I have also enabled Spam List from
MailScanner.conf and using spamhaus-ZEN for the same. So is it
possible to give scoring of those emails which listed
On 5/29/2010 4:23 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat 29 May 2010 10:06:08 PM CEST, Matt Kettler wrote
The loadplugin should be near the bottom of the file and looks like
this:
# MIMEHeader - apply regexp rules against MIME headers in the message
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin
On 5/29/2010 2:58 PM, Gabor Illo wrote:
Hello all!
Can somebody know how can i fix this error?
May 29 18:58:04 mail spamd[84958]: config: failed to parse line,
skipping, in
/var/db/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf:
mimeheader __TVD_MIME_ATT_AOPDF Content-Type =~
On 5/27/2010 11:50 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 5/27/2010 11:53 AM, Matt wrote:
Does 'bayes_learn_to_journal 1' in local.cf do anything yet? I
thought in past it helped save on disk I/O
Matt
FYI, please ignore the should we ignore journaling. My original
version of the email
On 5/27/2010 11:53 AM, Matt wrote:
Does 'bayes_learn_to_journal 1' in local.cf do anything yet? I
thought in past it helped save on disk I/O
Matt
Actually it will *increase* disk I/O during journal syncs by making the
synced dataset larger. During all other times, this has no affect on
On 5/19/2010 6:08 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
Chris wrote:
All my post contained was my scores for the spam sample he posted. Any
reason how/why this happened? Here's the actual post:
http://pastebin.com/gSuHGqXa
The scores also contain URIs that were matched against URIBLs so any
email
On 4/29/2010 11:07 PM, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if someone knows about GPL rules for SA, i know the SARE what
others?
TIA
LD
I assume by GPL you mean free to use. There's a bit of a list in the
wiki at:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
On 4/29/2010 8:25 AM, Frank Bures wrote:
I've been running spamassassin for years. I am using auto-learn with very
conservative thresholds. However, after several years of usage my spam
database is about three time larger than my ham database and I am starting
to see false positives.
Is
On 4/13/2010 3:30 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
--
var/log/exim/mainlog:2010-04-13 14:24:17 Connection from [110.139.156.19]
refused: too many connections
/Jason Ideally, correct me if I'm wrong, wouldn't I want SA to drop
the connection after doing a lookup on the IP or are you saying
On 4/9/2010 4:33 PM, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
I have AWL enabled and it seems to be ok with helping out legitimate
senders that occasionally send a spammy type message, but lately I
have seen an increase where AWL is adding a negative score to a very
blatant spam.
As long as it's not
On 4/4/2010 12:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When running sa-update with -D I see when there are updates the folowing
lines:
Apr 4 18:26:15.954 [12630] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule SHORTCIRCUIT
Apr 4 18:26:15.957 [12630] dbg: config: warning: score set for
On 4/1/2010 11:38 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
eetings, again.
spamassassin --lint runs clean.
I re-entered the line by hand and deleted the original so that shouldn't be
an issue.
I also reviewed the configuration file location list and there are no other
local.cf files or user_prefs files
On 3/31/2010 7:02 AM, Andrea Bencini wrote:
I installed with yum lhe following pakages:
postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin.
I have *.cf in /usr/share/spamassassin/ directory and now I would like
update them.
Is it possible? with sa-update?
If yes which is the complete command to use to
On 3/31/2010 12:34 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Greetings!
I upgraded SA from version 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 this morning.
Since that time all of the emails that are marked as spam are being converted
to attachments.
One other oddity. If you look close at the rewrite_header Subject line, you
will
On 3/31/2010 9:10 PM, Phill Edwards wrote:
But I don't understand how to use sa-update. I've run it and I can see
all the new rule files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005. However, I
think my rules run off the files in /usr/share/spamassassin/. The wiki
at
On 3/29/2010 11:40 AM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
I'm having a problem with the trusted_networks option. Right now I have it
set to:
trusted_networks 10.0.1/24
In postfix, I need to have spamassassin listed under
smtpd_recipient_restrictions so that it will only scan incoming emails
however it
On 3/22/2010 9:11 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
header__MY_FILTRAGE_TO_93 To =~ /\...@exxent\.net/i
This matches if @exxent.net is in the To: header line. It doesn't
match all mail sent to recipients at exxent.net-- only mail with their
address in the To: header line.
Of course
On 3/18/2010 6:41 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
Julian Yap wrote:
I'm trying to consolidate some rules I have.
I'm wondering if there's a way to see if multiple types of headers
exist.
eg. Currently separate rules:
header CMN_LIST_1 exists:X-Campid
describe CMN_LIST_1 Mail comes from a common
On 3/17/2010 8:32 PM, RW wrote:
The ASN and RelayCountry plugins are supposed to add extra tokens to
Bayes. However, I don't see any evidence that this is happening
(in 3.3.0). In a test message I see:
bayes: header tokens for X-Relay-Countries = GB GB ** ** GB GB
but don't see any
On 3/16/2010 8:27 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Toralf toralf.foers...@gmx.de wrote:
At my stable Gentoo I see this :
n22 /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005 # head -n 1
updates_spamassassin_org.cf # UPDATE version 895075
and now I'm wondering whether I can compare
On 3/16/2010 8:14 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Phill,
def_whitelist_from_rcvd *...@posts.freecycle.org posts.freecycle.org
Received: from bulkmail2.freecycle.org ([95.172.20.170])
by mscip02.mailsentry.net.au with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2010 17:51:21 +1100
From: frances.dejong
On 3/8/2010 2:33 PM, Renata Dias wrote:
Some messages receive score 0.00/0.00 and other receive the correct
score like the example below.
0/0 generally indicates the message was not scanned at all. The big
giveaway is the threshold is 0, instead of 6.0.
I'm not really an expert on simscan,
On 3/8/2010 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Renata Dias wrote on Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:33:15 -0300:
Some messages receive score 0.00/0.00 and other receive the correct score
like the example below.
First: there's no evidence that these messages *should* score anything.
Yes, but is
On 3/3/2010 8:22 AM, twofers wrote:
I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
Thats hundreds of these every day for weeks and weeks and weeks on
On 2/28/2010 8:50 AM, damuz wrote:
Hi all.
I've very recently had the problem of sorting out my work's email spam
dropped on my lap and to be honest, I know a little but a little knowledge
can be a dangerous thing...
Anyhow.
Having spent the last few days making as sure as I can be that
On 2/20/2010 10:39 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 20.2.2010 17:29, LuKreme wrote:
On 20-Feb-2010, at 08:21, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just found this rule in SA
1.6 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit
On 2/13/2010 9:49 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
ok looks like my problem is because I'm reprocessing a message that already
has an X-Spam-Languages: nothing header in it.
I expected that it wouldn't matter that it was there as it would be removed
and populated accordingly but that is only
On 2/13/2010 11:33 AM, David Morton wrote:
So token was both a primary key, and an index, which is redundant.
How is that redundant? If you search for only a token, it would not be
indexed, and would perform very poorly.
Because it is the primary key, which is by definition, an index!!!
On 2/12/2010 10:50 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I have
Feb 12 19:35:31.669 [81642] dbg: textcat: X-Languages: en,
X-Languages-Length: 424
in my testing
but the X-Spam-Languages ends up with nothing
I have in my user_prefs
add_header all Languages _LANGUAGES_
Is the
On 2/12/2010 2:51 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I looked at our bayes schema and at the schema in
../docs/sql/bayes_mysql.sql and I can't find the redundant index
mentioned in the SA 3.30 upgrade/changes documents.
did I miss something? or did I remove it years ago anyway?
A quick diff of
On 2/8/2010 9:52 AM, Tsabolov Sergey wrote:
I have some little problem with SpamAssassin
SpamAssassin with MailScanner .
I set the rule in mailscanner
# This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
Cache SpamAssassin Results = yes
SpamAssassin Cache Database File =
On 2/4/2010 5:35 AM, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
People,
in trying to set up Razor2 sitewide, I found some things, which were not so
good about the wikipage [1]. As per me, it would be this way (and it works):
I What was wrong
1. no need calling razor-client
2. no need to touch
On 2/5/2010 7:51 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Its not clear to me in what cases should -C /etc/mail/spamassassin be
added to calling spamassassin. Maybe /etc/mail/spamassassin is in some
default path?
(as it works without -C .. for me)
That clearly needs fixing.
-C should *NEVER
On 1/21/2010 10:46 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin. I've tried
to whitelist this group but the from header matches the address of the
original message sender, not the
On 1/14/2010 8:55 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
since 3.2.1 is still stable in gentoo portage would make sense to
update rules on this for that bug ?
Since, and 3.2.5 was released in June of 2008, and it's currently
January of 2010, wouldn't it make sense for gentoo to either:
1) abandon the
On 1/7/2010 9:14 PM, Matt Doran wrote:
Hi guys,
I was recently doing some reconfigurating/optimization of our
SpamAssassin setup. And I've started seeing the following entries in
the mail.log. They don't appear for every mail processed, but it
does happen multiple times a day.
I'm
Matt Doran wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
On 1/7/2010 9:14 PM, Matt Doran wrote:
Hi guys,
I was recently doing some reconfigurating/optimization of our
SpamAssassin setup. And I've started seeing the following entries
in the mail.log. They don't appear for every mail processed
On 1/6/2010 3:43 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/5/2010 8:03 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
Previously I was running SpamAssassin-3.1.8_1 on FreeBSD.
I recently upgraded to 3.2.5_4
On 1/5/2010 6:09 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run
spamassassin through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to
restart spamassassin and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin.
Debugging this, I found that
On 1/5/2010 8:03 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
Previously I was running SpamAssassin-3.1.8_1 on FreeBSD.
I recently upgraded to 3.2.5_4.
It's seems now, I never get any hits on the rule ALL_TRUSTED.
Previously it seemed like SA was doing some kind of dynamic evaluation
which was working well.
-
On 12/17/2009 2:50 AM, Rajkumar S wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 SA servers running for a single domain. Both were primed with
a set of 200 spam and ham messages are are now auto learning. After
about a day both have auto learned different numbers of ham and spam
mails. Is it possible to merge the
On 12/17/2009 11:17 AM, RW wrote:
If you're using file-based bayes, there's no good way to share
updates between one DB and the other. The information needed to make
such a merger successful isn't stored, because it is not needed for
any reason within SpamAssassin. The database merely
nathang wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to setup an email account in cPanel so that I receive *all*
incoming emails that contain a specific word in the subject line.
It would be critical that I get 100% of the emails sent to me (that contain
a specific word in the subject line), and that none of them
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm wondering if the language detection in TextCat can be improved.
Here's the situation.
It appears that TextCat was designed to be inclusive. You list the
languages you want and it returns many possibilities so as not to
trigger unwanted falsely.
What I'm doing is
Jason Carson wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is it necessary to clear the database...
sa-learn --clear
...before I run the following to train SpamAssassin's bayesian classifier...
sa-learn --spam /home/jason/.maildir/.Spam/cur/
No. That would be ill advised.
Running --clear deletes your
Thomas Harold wrote:
On 11/30/2009 9:27 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
While looking at the scores in 50_scores.cf, I noticed the following:
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 2.303 0.416 1.461 0.274
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 3.099 3.099 2.136 1.897
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 3.300 3.299 3.000 2.189
Daniel D Jones wrote:
Running 3.2.5 under Debian Etch.
I'm trying to add the Spamassassin X_Report_Header. Per the website at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
report_safe ( 0 | 1 | 2 ) (default: 1)
...
If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is
LuKreme wrote:
Is there a roadmap for the release of SA 3.3?
Probably the best roadmap would be to look at the list of bugs assigned
against 3.3.0
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDversion=3.3.0
a
Michael Monnerie wrote:
I can't reach Bill Stearns, so I try at this list:
Dear Bill,
I'm using the sa-blacklist.reject for postfix since a long time, but
these last days your rsync doesn't work anymore:
rsync: failed to connect to rsync.sa-blacklist.stearns.org: Connection
timed out
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Hi All,
I'm wondering if some know is this is possible to stop using SA. Look.
MAIL FROM and From: are commonly mismatched in legitimate mail.
For example, every message that you receive from this list (and every
other sanely configured mailing list) will have
Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
On 04.11.2009 / 09:20:16 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
polloxx wrote:
Hi,
Is the spamassassin development dead?
On the website there's: 2008-06-12: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 has been released.
Not quite. If you look at svn, you'll see this:
Computerflake wrote:
I'm looking into a free spam filter that can do the following. Will
Spamassassin do these things?
1) Will it filter multiple domains so I can filter for many different
companies?
Sure. Depending on how you set it up, you can even have per-domain
customization of the
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Dear friends,
There is some configuration of SA to generate different logs and these
are for each mail domain?
spamd, like most well behaved unix daemons, uses syslog. It doesn't
write logfiles directly.
The old-school approach to this would be to run several
klop...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I use Spamassassin 3.2.5 with CentOS
On October 20 I startet an update with this commands:
sa-update --channel updates.spamassassin.org
When I start now the update, the date of the folder and file in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005 does not change. It is
cofe2003 wrote:
i find SA will not scan a mail if messeage is blank .
so ,i want score all of blank messeages mails is 6.00
how can i do?
my SA version is 3.17
thanks
That's odd. SA should scan it, unless it is so blank there aren't even
any headers.
How have you integrated SA into
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
I have a set of users that are authorized to use the mail server via
pop-before-smtp, but SA catches the mail they send through the system
as spam because they are on blacklisted Verizon or Comcast IPs:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 tag1=-300.0 tag2=5.0 kill=5.0
ahattarki wrote:
The spamassassin report comes back in English. Is this configurable to return
results in languages other than english.
Also can a single spamassassin handle returning results in different
languages. One user gets the results back in English, while another gets the
results
poifgh wrote:
I have a question about - understanding how are rulesets generated for
spamassassin.
For example - consider the rule in 20_drugs.cf :
header SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_C Subject =~
/\bc.{0,2}i.{0,2}a.{0,2}l.{0,2}i.{0,2}s\b/i
describe SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_C Subject contains a
Mike Cardwell wrote:
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it doesn't seem to
include it yet. Currently we have:
pm...@email.it wrote:
Hi,
I've few question about the behavior of Bayes and SQL. Before the
questions, i've followed this tutorial
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/debian-spamassassin-sql.html that
should be the same thing of this:
to...@starbridge.org wrote:
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote
I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again:
same result.
forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Matt Kettler mkettler_sa at verizon.net writes:
In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
(SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote:
That would be a nice
ArtemGr wrote:
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests
when the required_score is not yet reached.
For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first,
and if the score is lower than the required_score,
then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests.
Is it possible?
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
I have an mbox with about a 100 messages in it from a few days ago.
The mbox is a combination of spam and ham. What is the best way to run
SA through these messages again, so I can catch the ones that have
URLs in them that weren't on the blacklist at the time they
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
Do you just want to re-scan the whole mbox and see what rules hit now
for research reasons?
That's a good start, but I'd like to see if I can break out the ham to
train bayes.
There's no way to (directly) get SA to modify email that's already in an
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
You probably want spamassassin --mbox. :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
spamassassin --mbox infile outfile.
If you're talking about sa-learn, though, it also knows --mbox.
Yes, but he's got mixed spam and nonspam in one mbox.
Chris Arrendale wrote:
I am running version 3.2.4 and interested to know if there are
additional language packs for Spam Assassin such as German, Turkish,
Chinese, etc.? If they are available, does anybody know where I can
download them?
There are a few language packs that come with SA.
McDonald, Dan wrote:
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net]
This rule should detect 10 consecutive occurrences.
uri L_URI_FUNNYDOTS /(?:\.[a-z,0-9]{2}\.){10}
Warning: I wrote this quickly without too much thought. It may have
bugs, but I'm short on time at the moment
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen this pattern in spam quite a bit lately:
snip - URI that verizon won't let me send
Would it be reasonable to create a rule that looks for this two-char
then dot pattern, or is it reasonable that it might appear in a
legitimate email too frequently?
1 - 100 of 3432 matches
Mail list logo
