You probably want spamassassin --mbox. :)
It won't modify the messages in-place, but you can do something like
spamassassin --mbox infile outfile.
If you're talking about sa-learn, though, it also knows --mbox.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:46 PM, MySQL Student mysqlstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote:
Should the file message.txt in the example contain the full -mail with
headers, attachments and everything ?
Yes. It should be the original and complete message.
Does the reporting tool remove all information about the
There's no way to do that with SpamAssassin itself. Once you send
something to SA, it will do the whole process (there's short
circuiting, but that's not really what you want here). It sounds like
you're trying to not filter internal mail but filter external mail, so
I would recommend two
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Per Jessenp...@computer.org wrote:
Back to the subject line - how do I make Net::DNS::Resolver
take /etc/hosts into account?
a) of course it doesn't, /etc/hosts isn't DNS, so why would Net::DNS
look at it? :)
b) my guess is that you can't, but it's a question for
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Matus UHLAR -
fantomasuh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
I am not sure but I think something alike was done. What I mean is to have
generic chain of format converters, where at the end would be plain image
or even text, that could be processed by classic rules like
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Jonas Eckermanjonas_li...@frukt.org wrote:
Already exists, check recent list history for set_rendered.
I though that was for text only.
It is only for text.
In any case, any plugin looking for images, or a PDF, will most likely look
at MIME type and/or file
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Jonas Eckermanjonas_li...@frukt.org wrote:
Matus example was a Word document that contained as PDF wich (might in turn
contain an image). A plugin that knows how to read word document could
extract th text of the word document and then use set_rendered to make
Well, the point is that if it works, don't break it.
Yes, you can totally avoid upgrades, depending on your environment.
Sometimes you have no choice and continue to run old versions of
software or firmware or ...
Get over it. :)
If you want to continue debating system administration issues,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Kasper Sacharias Eenbergk...@hovmark.dk
wrote:
I'm not completely sure that force-expire does anything. I ran it
several times last week, and nothing showed up in the 'last expiry
atime' column. So i figured it wasn't working.
Please keep in mind that
The debug output is saying that the meta rule, LOCAL_BAYES_RTF, has a
dependency, BAYES_99, which has a 0 score.
In the score line, there are two zero values. ;) It depends what
scoreset you're running in.
Also, just because 50_scores.cf has something set doesn't mean
something later on doesn't
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Jason Haarjason.h...@trimble.co.nz wrote:
Speaking of image/rtf/word attachment spam; is there any work going on
to standardize this so that the textual output of such attachments could
be fed back into SA?
That functionality already exists (has for almost 3
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Charles Gregorycgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
H. Big question for developers: Does the performance 'burden' of a large
e-mail come from the 'reading' of that mail into spamassassin and initial
processing? Or is the 'cost' of a large message only 'paid' when SA
, Larry
M.rosenbau...@ornl.gov wrote:
From: felic...@kluge.net On Behalf Of Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Jason Haarjason.h...@trimble.co.nz
wrote:
Speaking of image/rtf/word attachment spam; is there any work going
on
to standardize this so that the textual output
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Michael
Monneriemichael.monne...@is.it-management.at wrote:
On Mittwoch 17 Juni 2009 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Yes, it matters (one path is tried then the other has to be tried, as
opposed to having a single path)
So which is better performance wise? I guess [sz
Yes, it matters (one path is tried then the other has to be tried, as
opposed to having a single path), though the overall amount is
probably negligible. Perl's RE compiler could well optimize this away
anyway.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Kelsonkel...@speed.net wrote:
Wouldn't it be more
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Andy Dormanador...@ironicdesign.com wrote:
However, I was a little surprised that SpamAssassin did not have a test for
a phrase in the subject that seemed to clearly indicate potential child porn
like girls getting f**ked.
SpamAssassin is not a porn filter,
No, SA doesn't do that. The best way to do this is to write a plugin
where you can do whatever you want. :)
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Charles Gregorycgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
Got a usage question. Is there a simple mechanism, similar to Perl's use
of parantheses and $1 to 'capture' a
Well, the first problem is that the AWL has no impact on Bayes.
They're totally independent.
Perhaps you want sa-learn ?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Larry Starr lar...@fullcompass.com wrote:
I have been using the AWL ( --add-addr-to-blacklist ) for some time, to bump
new spam senders above
fwiw, even if there isn't a blank line, SA will figure it out (though
it'll trigger a MISSING_HB_SEP rule hit).
As for the debug output ... it depends, how did you run the command
(ie: what was the command you tried). My guess is you did something
like spamassassin -D filename, where filename
That depends, what's TVD.pm? ;)
Doing a quick search shows
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200603.mbox/%3c20060316233124.gv22...@kluge.net%3e
which was a conversation we had way back in 2006 about SA 3.1 and bug
4255. There was a TVD.pm in discussion, so I assume
When you say the database, do you mean bayes_toks or bayes_toks
and bayes_seen? If the former, you need to grant write privs to
bayes_seen as well.
Also, when in doubt, run w/ -D to see what's going on.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Russell Jones rjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
I am running a
None of the IPs you listed will match.
Have you tried simply running a loop in Perl to see what the results are?
Also, negation ~ ? What do you mean? =~ is not a negation (that
would be !~).
Also also, the ^ and $ chars are important. If you remove them,
you change the RE.
On Fri, May 29,
Sure, change your mail system so it doesn't call SA more than once on
the same message. :)
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Garik garik@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything that can be done so there's only one instance of
[**SPAM**] in the subject? Have postfix strip out the spam headers from
What version of IO::Zlib do you have installed? sa-update line 82 is
it trying to load IO::Zlib 1.04 or later:
use IO::Zlib 1.04;
So my guess is that you either have an early non-version exporting
version, or a strange/corrupted module. Either way, reinstalling it
would be the way to go.
On
just fyi, I left spamassassin.kluge.net up for over a month after
removing it from the MIRRORED.BY file, and forced a new update to deal
with https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6083. I
figured that anyone using sa-update would run it at least once a
month, and then get the new
fwiw, I also confirm any CR mails that I get. I just wanted to paste
in this quote... :)
challenge response is a great way to tell people they are less important
than you - Dan Quinlan via IRC
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Dave Pooser dave...@pooserville.com wrote:
Not necessarily
Mail::SPF replaced Mail::SPF::Query. You should pick one or the
other, though Mail::SPF is preferred. See the INSTALL doc.
Also note, the module diag output is not a list of things that you
need to install, it's just a list that can help when debugging.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Jack
This has been said before, but there seems to still be some confusion.
In short -- you seem to think you're using amavis, and have an amavis
config file ... But instead you seem to be calling spamc/spamd, which
is completely different and unrelated.
If you want to use amavis, then stop using
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Micah Anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
Eh? Last journal sync atime is Jan 1 1970?
Try running: sa-learn --sync
Doesn't seem to change the 'last journal sync atime' from 0.
[...]
I'm using a mysql DB and I've got the following set in my local.cf:
SQL Bayes
You're wrong (but you're close). :)
You can configure your own whitelist_from_* and blacklist_from_* (or
the other whitelist/blacklist commands) in your user_prefs/configs.
Either you have the config or you don't, and the scores are for the
rule not each sender, so in that sense, it's permanent.
2009/5/4 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
Bear in mind that an email that gets a Bayes score of more than one
point can't be autolearned as ham.
Nope, this is wrong.
The Bayes rules (as well as some other rules) do NOT have any impact on
the auto-learning. In fact, the
just cause more confusion.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Then there's the AWL, aka the historical score averager, which has
some commands via spamassassin to do simple manipulation, usually to
correct undesired entries. The score
If you're using amavis, what is calling spamc? It sounds like
something changed your config somewhere. Did someone put in a
procmailrc entry?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Alejandro Cabrera Obed
aco1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all, I use Postfix (version 2.3.8-2+etch1) + amavisd-new (version
2009/5/4 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
via https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=2865. In
No commit pointer. I'm lazy, Theo, any hints to the actual commit so I
don't have to dig? :)
Sure. I found it by a) looking at the code and validating my
understanding,
Apparently the clamav.pm plugin requires other modules which you
didn't install. You need to find out what the dependencies are, and
make sure they're met before trying to use the plugin.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Chris cpoll...@embarqmail.com wrote:
Can't locate File/Scan/ClamAV.pm in
bayes_seen is rather irrelevant.
bayes_toks is very binary-oriented, and uses lots of pack() calls.
There is no SA-based validity check for the DB files/data. If you
think the DB file itself is corrupt, you could try the appropriate DBM
tools (db_verify, etc.) The dump/restore method really
I would say it's less someone poisoning your DB and more your DB
becoming corrupt. As it says, a pack format of dec(73) is not a valid
value. It's set by the BayesStore module itself, not influenced by
the token in question.
You can try to do a dump/verify/restore ... ala:
sa-learn --sync
There could be various reasons ranging from plugin isn't loaded
(though you'd get an error w/ the rules then) to image isn't exactly
that size, to plugin can't determine width+height from image, to
...
Assuming the plugin is loaded (spamassassin -D plugin --lint would
tell you), and you've
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com wrote:
The mechanism for sa-update is brilliant, but
doesn't lend itself to enormous indices of frequently-changing rulesets.
I guess it depends what you mean by enormous. A sought rule update is 135k.
The likelihood is, imo, that
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:06 PM, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
And 135k doesn't add up to a lot of bandwidth?
...so don't look for updates more than once every day or two.
Yeah, but I think the point was that a frequently changing ruleset
would be downloaded frequently.
And if
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com wrote:
I guess it depends what you mean by enormous. A sought rule update is
135k.
And 135k doesn't add up to a lot of bandwidth? I suppose it depends
on the number of users, and I'm figuring worst-case scenario, e.g.
when/if
2009/4/28 Robert Ober ro...@robob.com:
It was global and I want it to stay global. The old procmailrc is:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
That's a global config, but you're running it per-user due to the
DROPPRIVS line. fyi.
All I want to do now is have all the identified
fwiw, I was going to say Yes to the first question. Not sure about
the second question, though I've always wanted to see more
sharing/give-back from those folks.
While there have been a bunch of mails on the dev list, most of it is
incorrectly opened bugs, or other randomness.
IMO, there hasn't
It's already been mentioned, but mimeheader is the right way to look
at the headers of MIME parts.
The rule of thumb is if you are using 'full' you're probably doing it
wrong. :)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Gary Forrest wrote:
You'd really want to post the message headers in pastebot or something
so people can look at them. It's not just the Date header, the rule
also looks at the Received headers, etc.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Rik hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
I was stumped on a question today about
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:47 AM, m.b mbarc...@f451.net wrote:
scantime=3.2,size=2745,user=(unknown),uid=104,required_score=5.0,rhost=,raddr=..,rport=57786,mid=
Do you have any suggestions why not every message is passing through BAYESS?
I thought it is was locking problem
at 11:27 AM, m.b mbarc...@f451.net wrote:
If user would be missing, it would always cause problems. But it works 75% of
the time.
Mark
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:47 AM, m.b mbarc...@f451.net wrote:
scantime=3.2,size=2745,user=(unknown),uid=104,required_score=5.0,rhost
It's already been mentioned, but SpamAssassin doesn't accept, deliver,
or route mail. It simply marks up a message, particularly with some
added headers, and then you would need something else to filter/route
mails as you want.
As for looking for encrypted vs unencrypted mails, you'd have to
Just fyi, this particular topic keeps getting raised here. It'd be
great if people would search the list archives. :)
One of the last times around:
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=21296293framed=y
In short, if you want to do this, write a plugin. REs are great until
you get
It sounds like an issue w/ kmail/vim and not so much a nefarious
spammer ability.
And I'm not sure what you mean by unlisted header. If you mean:
[other headers]
To:
unlisted header
Then the answer is unlisted header is actually the first line of the body.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:55 PM,
Oh, and having a sample mail via pastebin/etc would be handy if you
want more commentary about the mail. :)
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Theo Van Dinter felic...@apache.org wrote:
It sounds like an issue w/ kmail/vim and not so much a nefarious
spammer ability.
And I'm not sure what you
Since you don't need Net::Ident for SA, I'm going to say no.
:)
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2009, Bill Landry wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Using cpan, trying to install Net::Ident (the other bits except razor were
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
This is a funny case, since the message in question is generated by a
machine that I would set as TRUSTED. I am the moderator for
regional-bos...@netbsd.org, and it gets spam, stunningly enough. The
mail is sent to me over
According to the debug output, you just have the openprotect channel
and not the SA updates channel. Hence, none of the standard rules
exist. Run sa-update. :)
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:15 PM, oliver oli...@schinagl.nl wrote:
This is a clean install on a gentoo hardened box. I'm using SA 3.2.5
10_misc.cf isn't in 3.2, 3.1 was the last version to have it.
In 3.2 it's called 10_default_prefs.cf.
You should have it installed in the default rules dir, probably
/usr/share/spamassassin.
And no, it's not editable. Or more specifically, you shouldn't edit it.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at
I would use formail -s to go through the mbox file, and pipe the
mail through procmail w/ an appropriate recipe file to filter the mails as
you'd want.
SpamAssassin is happy to markup your mails, but has no filtering capabilities
since it doesn't deliver mail.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:37:30PM
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:50:32PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
you have LEGIT EMAIL with this in it?
style
I do too. AFAICT, it's Microsoft related.
taking a look at my january corpus, there are a relative lot of hits
for that, including things like STYLE/STYLE. a lot of the mails,
as
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:49:12PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Why does it update the journal? Why does it try to open journal in R/W mode?
$ man sa-learn
[...]
bayes_journal
While SpamAssassin is scanning mails, it needs to track which tokens
it uses in its cal-
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 01:58:48AM +0100, mouss wrote:
Then I should use postfix regexp capabilities to rewrite subject and
replace
[SPAM] with [VIRII] in case X-Spam-Virus: Yes
If you mean header_checks, you can't. header_checks operate on headers
ONE at a time. you can't tell it to
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:37:37PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It appears to me that the HABEAS rules are hitting only a very tiny
fraction of
mail, many of the nightly mass-checks don't have a hit at all (or is it
that those
checks don't contain any network checks?). The
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:12:47PM +0300, JVlad wrote:
Thanks, but is there a way to get this perl script executed as part of
Spamassassin work and pass there score, ip, and address?
Does spamassassin support such post-processing plugins?
Yes, though unfortunately writing plugins is rather
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Florian Lagg wrote:
So - if possible - I want spamassassign to:
1. Request the links in the mail body and check them for http-error 302 or
meta redirects
2. Check the links we got by doing this against some DNSBL's
Is this possible? Is there a
rtm for meta rules
:)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:45:18AM -0800, ml wrote:
Concerning scoring options defined on “user_prefs”, is there a way to
apply AND logical operation for two or more SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs describing
like “score A B 2.0”? If it is not available now, let me know how to
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:46:37AM -0800, schnee wrote:
1: MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
So what ? Do I have to send a text only part also? All my users can read
HTML.
It'd probably be a good idea to do multipart/alternative w/ an appropriate
text/plain
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:28:45PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
I don't know that anyone said it couldn't be done. It is however rather
expensive. That long multi-header regex could take a very long time to
run because it may have to scan the entire header block if one of the
From/To headers is
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 05:33:36PM +, Johan Borch wrote:
[22640] warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory razor2:
Can't read conf file: = /etc/razor/razor-agent.conf at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line 326.
Do you have a
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:54:23PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
echo 24F434CE gpg.keys
echo 6C6191E3 gpg.keys
echo 856AA88A gpg.keys
The three lines that are echo HEXCODE gpg.keys are the issue for
me, I guess. Where do those numbers come from?
They're the keyids for the given channels
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Jon Essen-Moller wrote:
So you look in the /var/log/maillog (maybe with grep) and find messages
and their id you are interested in. I get you that far.
:)
Are there a log somewhere where one can find information like the last
log entry you pasted
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:16:03PM +0100, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Could you describe more elaborately how you did that?
You may wish to take a look at cpan2rpm, fwiw.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
... Either this man is suffering from serious brain damage, or the new
vacuum cleaner's
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:00:10PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
mechanism for. Devs: there've been wishes for this before; how hard
would it be to add the ability to match on the substring match captured
by another rule? Add a flag to say capture the match for this rule and
a syntax for
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
The Bayes database can be backed up and restored with sa-learn
--backup/--restore. Is there any similar way to back up and restore a
MySQL-based AWL database? The check_whitelist command is only good for DBM
files.
If
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:53:20AM +0100, Jon Essen-Moller wrote:
the mail was in HTML, so it's basically unreadable. text please.
I did get out of it:
I wish to check a specific mail address and see if many mails are
classified as spam that are sent to that address.br
It sounds like you want
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:46:32PM -0700, Kelly Jones wrote:
I want to run a message through ONE SpamAssassin test w/o the overhead
of running all the tests.
Does SA have a --run-just-this-test=FOO option?
It sounds like you want to take a look at the mass-check tool. :)
--
Randomly
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:52:18PM +0100, Jon wrote:
Does anyone know if it is possible to retrieve information from any of
theses files below about mails that are classified as spam?
Or in general. I there a way to view statistics from spammassassin?
bayes_seen
bayes_toks
What kind
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:13:26AM -0700, Kelly Jones wrote:
SA doesn't use EvalTests.pm's check_for_from_to_same test, but part of
the code looks like this:
Wow. Had to whip out the 3.1 code to find this...
Is that right? Shouldn't the 'eq' be 'ne'?
As the comment about 6 lines up from
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 08:30:32AM -0800, jlefvendahl wrote:
I am new to administrating a server with SpamAssassin. Currently, our server
is using score set (0), and I would like for it to be (3) - Bayes + network.
I need some specific instructions on how to change this server-wide -
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:42:05PM -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
How do I go about trapping this error in locker? (Specifically, how do I
figure out who Called locker, to find the code that's not closing the file
it opened?)
Has anyone else run into this sort of issue?
The last time this sort of
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:37:36PM +0100, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL 5.0
(for add five points to e-mail contains www.viapaypal.com
http://www.viapaypal.com/ into body)
I've add it to
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:39:49PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/local/bin/spamassassin -V
spamassassin: spamassassin script is v3.001007, but using modules v3.002005
How should I proceed to fix the installation so there's only one copy
(either in
Tagline:
You're not significant until someone complains about you publically.
- Theo Van Dinter
pgpxYO9qf7Rtd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:07:15PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd
reports:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd
There are 195 reports, of which 90% or more seem to be new. Has the
spamd
This has come up on the list before, but... Looking at my most recent
network run:
OVERALLSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
0 460740215640.955 0.000.00 (all messages)
0.0 95.5290 4.47100.955 0.000.00 (all messages as %)
74.714 78.1593
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:01:48AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
meta URIBL_BLACK_ADJ (URIBL_BLACK)
describe URIBL_BLACK_ADJ Meta: i trust uribl more :)
score URIBL_BLACK_ADJ 1.5
that way you still benefit from score adjust on sa-rules
The right way to do this is:
score URIBL_BLACK (1.5)
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:15:00AM +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
74.714 78.1593 1.11300.986 0.780.00 URIBL_BLACK
Would you pls post those FP URIs so ppl can judge what your rating is
based upon.
(imperfect) command posted for my future reference ...
$ grep URIBL_BLACK
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:49:41PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
The check_whitelist tool is apparently gone,
- can we use this tool from older releases with 3.2.5?
Not sure. Probably, unless the format changed.
Is there any work to get tools/ back?
It got removed from the tarball
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:19:49AM -0700, NeoSHNIK wrote:
I am making a new plugin and in order gather enough data about its
performance I need to turn off all other tests. I was very surprised that
there aren't any topics about it.
So how does one turn off all SA tests?
Set their scores to 0
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:42:53PM -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
And here is the information from the local.cf file:
bayes_expiry_max_db_size 50
So the config file says 500 thousand tokens, but the database has 105 million
entries. Have I misunderstood something, or is expiry
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Kelsey, Theo, can you check and see why your secondaries aren't picking up
the zone change on updates.spamassassin.org? cheers,
Grrr. I really need to fix this stupid bind package:
Sep 26 11:31:05 eclectic named[29926]: dumping
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:52:27PM -0500, Alan Lehman wrote:
I've seen a few false positives that hit MATCH_WORDS_5. Can someone
point me to this rule so I can try to determine what is causing the hit?
As far as I can see, there is no such rule in the standard or updates
rulesets. Perhaps it's
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 05:03:06PM +0100, David Carvalho wrote:
Is it possible to redirect classified spam to another file, just after
classification, instead of
No.
appending to the user regular mail file (like /var/mail/usermail) ?
SA isn't doing that either. It's just marking up the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:32:54AM -0400, Skip wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# telnet discovery.razor.cloudmark.com 2703
Trying 208.83.137.205...
telnet: connect to address 208.83.137.205: Connection timed out
Trying 208.83.137.117...
telnet: connect to address 208.83.137.117: Connection timed
Since you're using amavis, you'd have to ask those folks.
SA will scan anything given to it, so ...
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:05:39AM +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote:
Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin.
Hello Evan,
how can I do that?
(I am newbie)
--
If you think there's an issue, feel free to pastebot the message somewhere and
folks can take a look. Otherwise there's not much people are going to be able
to comment on.
My guess is that however you're feeding mails into SA is having issues.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:18:37AM -0700, Bob
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:34:34AM -0700, Bob Gereford wrote:
Here's the paste of the raw message content from the last message
http://pastebin.com/d57d0894d
Yeah, nothing strange there. Passing it through spamassassin shows what
you'd expect:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:36:30AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just want to mention that
$ sa-update -D
[7581] dbg: gpg: gpg: WARNING: signing subkey 24F434CE is not cross-certified
[7581] dbg: gpg: gpg: please see
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:33:56PM -0700, SM wrote:
They are not the only ones using these IP addresses for internal
use. It will be interesting to see what happens when these IP
addresses are assigned.
Reminds me of a time where I ran into a company who internally were
using long-time
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:41:17PM -0700, Owen Mehegan wrote:
Here are two more that got through today. Even several hours later, these
haven't shown up in blacklists. Do anyone else's rules catch these?
Your main problem is that both messages hit BAYES_00:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:16:38PM -0700, RN-Chris wrote:
I have a custom spam corpus that I am trying to run rules against to test
their effectiveness however mass-check will only scan a few ( 5 ) messages
of the spam and usually only 1 or 2 of the ham messages. Any clues? Roughly
a week of
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 11:36:57AM -0700, Gigi Albertosi wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a place where I can find
an archive of spamassassin official rules and their associated date
of creation/update.
For example, a dataset of the type
RULE_NAME1LAST_UPDATE
RULE_NAME2
I don't know of any connectivity issues w/ the kluge.net server.
There were some ISP issues last month that took it offline for a day or
so, but nothing in the last couple of days.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:34:22AM +0100, Rob Sharp wrote:
There was a message recently posted saying that Yerp
1 - 100 of 1739 matches
Mail list logo
