Michael Scheidell wrote:
One thing I would like to see (and this is a different subject:
Marc: take note: Id like to NOT BOUNCE an email back to the victim of
backscatter if they bothered to publish SPF or SENDER ID records that
don't match the incoming.
It's the other way around. you
On Sep 23, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Anyone have an answer that isn't obvious?
I already said I can't put it on the proxy.
No, you didn't. You mentioned that as an option.
And stop being rude to people who answer the question you asked.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance :
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:31:04PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
One thing I would like to see (and this is a different subject:
Marc: take note: Id like to NOT BOUNCE an email back to the victim of
backscatter if they bothered to publish SPF or SENDER ID records that
don't match the
If whoever's responsible for the proxy is not able to
implement normal recipient validation, I think this makes a
good case that they aren't able to keep it running adequately.
Its worse, we have to feed it to 'yap' (yet another proxy) and THAT
proxy also does no recipient validation, so
Every problem you've named here is solved by putting Amavis/SA on the
proxy instead of the internal system.
If the proxy doesn't do the spam-checking, and the internal system does
I can name a dozen other problems that will occur, the most important of
which will be backscatter. 2-step relay
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 01:50:43PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Sometimes a large company will have a proxy server set up in the DMZ and
then send it to their internal mail server.
...
#1, SPF. SPF helo, SENDERID
The proxy will be adding a received header, and announcing 'HELO/EHLO'
Anyone have an answer that isn't obvious?
I already said I can't put it on the proxy.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Office: 561-999-5000 x 1259
Direct: 561-939-7259
Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
_
This
One thing I would like to see (and this is a different subject:
Marc: take note: Id like to NOT BOUNCE an email back to the victim of
backscatter if they bothered to publish SPF or SENDER ID records that
don't match the incoming.
(and, yes, this would NOT work behind a proxy)
I would like the
