Re: .co.at

2014-11-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.11.14 20:22, Igor Chudov wrote: I have a special perl script, that I wrote, that scans emails, makes a WHOIS query via a perl WHOIS module, and looks at the creation date. this was already discussed and discouraged - you may get blocked at whois servers. DOB is a RBL created for this

Re: .co.at

2014-11-23 Thread Noel Butler
On 24/11/2014 01:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 22.11.14 20:22, Igor Chudov wrote: I have a special perl script, that I wrote, that scans emails, makes a WHOIS query via a perl WHOIS module, and looks at the creation date. this was already discussed and discouraged - you may

Re: .co.at

2014-11-22 Thread Igor Chudov
them for one day, and give them up without paying registration. It works really great for, for example, .com, .in, and many other TLDs. For those TLDs, this script suffices and catches majority of such spams and I am very happy. Unfortunately, .co.at does not provide creation date, and thus I am

Re: .co.at

2014-11-22 Thread Reindl Harald
for this is that spammers register throwaway domains, spam from them for one day, and give them up without paying registration. It works really great for, for example, .com, .in, and many other TLDs. For those TLDs, this script suffices and catches majority of such spams and I am very happy. Unfortunately, .co.at

Re: .co.at

2014-11-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
As you learned by now co.at ist just as valid as any other TLD. There are many like that. Some have just shifted to that scheme, others are moving away from it (for instance uk is now offering raw .uk registrations which you couldn't get until last year or so). Unfortunately, there's

.co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
snowshoe... high fashion May cause FPs co.at is a subdomain hoster/pseudo tld uri AXB_URI_WHATCOAT/http\:\/\/\w+\.co\.at\// won't last long...

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Mark Martinec
snowshoe... high fashion May cause FPs co.at is a subdomain hoster/pseudo tld uri AXB_URI_WHATCOAT/http\:\/\/\w+\.co\.at\// uri AXB_URI_WHATCOAT m{http://\w+\.co\.at/} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaning_toothpick_syndrome :) Mark

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 06:55 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: snowshoe... high fashion May cause FPs co.at is a subdomain hoster/pseudo tld uriAXB_URI_WHATCOAT/http\:\/\/\w+\.co\.at\// uri AXB_URI_WHATCOAT m{http://\w+\.co\.at/} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaning_toothpick_syndrome :) hmpf

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.11.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Axb: snowshoe... high fashion May cause FPs co.at is a subdomain hoster/pseudo tld no, it's the same as co.uk and on the same level as .at itself, meaning you and anybody else can register it by nic.at (the official registry for .at) or a approved

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 07:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.11.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Axb: snowshoe... high fashion May cause FPs co.at is a subdomain hoster/pseudo tld no, it's the same as co.uk and on the same level as .at itself, meaning you and anybody else can register it by nic.at

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 07:31 PM, Axb wrote: On 11/13/2014 07:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.11.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Axb: snowshoe... high fashion May cause FPs co.at is a subdomain hoster/pseudo tld no, it's the same as co.uk and on the same level as .at itself, meaning you and anybody

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.11.2014 um 20:02 schrieb Axb: do I get it right? you work for .co.at? no you stil refuse to understand what .co.at is .co.at === .at if yes, what's the deal with this institution allowing spammers such a blast of sudden abuse? that's not a institution .co.at is as well as.at

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 08:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.11.2014 um 20:02 schrieb Axb: do I get it right? you work for .co.at? no you stil refuse to understand what .co.at is .co.at === .at if yes, what's the deal with this institution allowing spammers such a blast of sudden abuse? that's

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.11.2014 um 20:06 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 13.11.2014 um 20:02 schrieb Axb: do I get it right? you work for .co.at? no you stil refuse to understand what .co.at is .co.at === .at if yes, what's the deal with this institution allowing spammers such a blast of sudden abuse? that's

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Jonathan Siegle
On 2014-11-13 at 20:18, Reindl Harald wrote: please give me a list of .co.at domains blowing out junk Here is one I just received: Received: from 0934796b.explosis.co.at (29nty.explosis.co.at [67.136.233.21]) by tr11n04.aset.psu.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sADJPBTs19595484

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 08:11 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Axb wrote: On 11/13/2014 07:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.11.2014 um 19:42 schrieb David B Funk: Recently (in the past few days) I've seen a flood of spam that have spamvertized websites registered in the .co.at domain

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: please give me a list of .co.at domains blowing out junk in this thread I already posted a pastebin link to the last ones I've seen. i have a special whois and can look if they all are registered by the same registrar and if that is the case i

Re: .co.at

2014-11-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.11.2014 um 20:33 schrieb Axb: On 11/13/2014 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: please give me a list of .co.at domains blowing out junk in this thread I already posted a pastebin link to the last ones I've seen. sorry , maybe i missed that i have a special whois and can look