Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-11 Thread jdow
From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 2007, October 08 10:33 On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote: FWIW... that IP, 220.226.197.15, is currently listed on four spam blacklists (RBLs): 1) uceprotect 2) no-more-funn

Re: [sa-list] RE: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-10 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Bret Miller wrote: sa-update does NOT feed a local blocklist generated by *my* particular corpus of spam emails. Think of it as the RBL equivalent of sitewide-bayes. Or think of it as a way of SA saying when I get twelve spams of score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-09 Thread Steven Kurylo
Or think of it as a way of SA saying when I get twelve spams of score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I will feed the auto-expiring RBL, which *SENDMAIL* works off of, thus keeping my *SPAMASSASSIN* load lower. Thus a spam deluge via a dictionary attack that may take hours is mitigated in the

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-09 Thread Jonas Eckerman
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: sa-update does NOT feed a local blocklist generated by *my* particular corpus of spam emails. Think of it as the RBL equivalent of sitewide-bayes. Or think of it as a way of SA saying when I get twelve spams of score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I will feed

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-09 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote: Or think of it as a way of SA saying when I get twelve spams of score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I will feed the auto-expiring RBL, which *SENDMAIL* works off of, thus keeping my *SPAMASSASSIN* load lower. Thus a spam deluge via a dictionary attack

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-09 Thread Steven Kurylo
Parsing the SA logs would be easy, but the connecting IP isn't listed there. As I mentioned, I'm parsing exim's logs. It contains the spam score and the IP address.

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-09 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote: Parsing the SA logs would be easy, but the connecting IP isn't listed there. As I mentioned, I'm parsing exim's logs. It contains the spam score and the IP address. Oh, that's true enough. I was musing on parsing my own logfiles as opposed to

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-09 Thread bgodette
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote: Parsing the SA logs would be easy, but the connecting IP isn't listed there. As I mentioned, I'm parsing exim's logs. It contains the spam score and the IP address. Oh, that's true enough. I was musing on

Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-08 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote: FWIW... that IP, 220.226.197.15, is currently listed on four spam blacklists (RBLs): 1) uceprotect 2) no-more-funn 3) psbl 4) ivmSIP.com (mine) On 07.10.07 05:55, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: My

Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip)

2007-10-08 Thread Rob McEwen
On 07.10.07 05:55, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: My problem is: blocklists come and go, and some blocklists, when they go, do things like hang up because they're being flooded, thus slowing my mail processes or flag all mail as spam or hand out stale data that hasn't changed at all in