Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-26 Thread Nick Edwards
On 11/26/14, Paul Gardiner li...@glidos.net wrote: On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two

Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
Hi, I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two confusing changes. 1) The really problematic one is that I no longer see X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers in the processed mail. I do

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two confusing changes. 1) The really problematic one is that I no longer see X-Spam-Level and

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two confusing changes. 1) The really problematic one is

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.11.2014 um 11:31 schrieb Paul Gardiner: On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Axb
On 11/25/2014 11:31 AM, Paul Gardiner wrote: On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two confusing

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 10:37, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 11:31 schrieb Paul Gardiner: On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Noel Butler
How are you calling spamassassin? On 25/11/2014 20:53, Paul Gardiner wrote: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two confusing changes. 1) The really problematic one is that I no

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
I'm using spampd as follows: spampd --port=10025 --relayhost=127.0.0.1:25 --user=paul --group=users --homedir=/home/paul/.spamassassin --tagall --children=5 --maxsize=512 --log-rules-hit I may also be using a newer version of spampd than when this previously worked for me. My mail is being

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Axb
On 11/25/2014 12:50 PM, Paul Gardiner wrote: I'm using spampd as follows: spampd --port=10025 --relayhost=127.0.0.1:25 --user=paul --group=users --homedir=/home/paul/.spamassassin --tagall --children=5 --maxsize=512 --log-rules-hit This is hardly a SA issue... Suggest you check the spampd

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 12:13, Axb wrote: On 11/25/2014 12:50 PM, Paul Gardiner wrote: I'm using spampd as follows: spampd --port=10025 --relayhost=127.0.0.1:25 --user=paul --group=users --homedir=/home/paul/.spamassassin --tagall --children=5 --maxsize=512 --log-rules-hit This is hardly a SA issue...

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 12:39, Paul Gardiner wrote: On 25/11/2014 12:13, Axb wrote: On 11/25/2014 12:50 PM, Paul Gardiner wrote: I'm using spampd as follows: spampd --port=10025 --relayhost=127.0.0.1:25 --user=paul --group=users --homedir=/home/paul/.spamassassin --tagall --children=5 --maxsize=512

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Mark Martinec
2014-11-25 13:52, Paul Gardiner wrote: On 25/11/2014 12:39, Paul Gardiner wrote: On 25/11/2014 12:13, Axb wrote: On 11/25/2014 12:50 PM, Paul Gardiner wrote: I'm using spampd as follows: spampd --port=10025 --relayhost=127.0.0.1:25 --user=paul --group=users

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 13:09, Mark Martinec wrote: 2014-11-25 13:52, Paul Gardiner wrote: On 25/11/2014 12:39, Paul Gardiner wrote: On 25/11/2014 12:13, Axb wrote: On 11/25/2014 12:50 PM, Paul Gardiner wrote: I'm using spampd as follows: spampd --port=10025 --relayhost=127.0.0.1:25 --user=paul

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.11.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Paul Gardiner: That rule is present, and the problem is definitely with spampd because I just piped a message through spamassassin from the command line and all the headers were added. Struggling to see how spampd is messing it up though. I can't see anywhere

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 14:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Paul Gardiner: That rule is present, and the problem is definitely with spampd because I just piped a message through spamassassin from the command line and all the headers were added. Struggling to see how spampd is

Re: Confused by new version of spamassassin

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Gardiner
On 25/11/2014 09:57, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.11.2014 um 10:40 schrieb Paul Gardiner: I drive spamassassin using spampd. I've just swapped from using opensuse 13.1 to 13.2. That's taken me from spamassassin 3.3.2 to 3.4.0. I have two confusing changes. 1) The really problematic one is