Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 12:21:19 PM, you wrote:
A is your SA 3.4 working now?
A after all this noise it would be rewarding to see some success.
Yes... as of this morning-
[root@nitrogen tmp]# cd /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/
[root@nitrogen Socket]# ls
INET6.pm
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 12:21:19 PM, you wrote:
A is your SA 3.4 working now?
A after all this noise it would be rewarding to see some success.
Mail is still being handled by our backup server but the primary is now
back in situ
Well the server was sitting on our dining table
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:52:10 PM, you wrote:
RH perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 is part of 5.11
RH this is completly untested and unsupported CentOS 5.11
Axb's yum update -y was done and I'm seeing-
Package 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Am 23.11.2014 um 10:58 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:52:10 PM, you wrote:
RH perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 is part of 5.11
RH this is completly untested and unsupported CentOS 5.11
Axb's yum update -y was done and I'm seeing-
Package
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 12:38:00 PM, you wrote:
A yum install
A http://pkgs.repoforge.org/perl-Net-DNS/perl-Net-DNS-0.71-1.el5.rfx.x86_64.rpm
yum install perl-Net-DNS shows-
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: repo.bigstepcloud.com
* epel:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH *lease* start to post complete outputs instead pack them in your own
RH words to help others helping you
The missing stuff!
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base:
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:28 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH *lease* start to post complete outputs instead pack them in your own
RH words to help others helping you
The missing stuff!
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH pack them in your own
RH words
Further the original quotes are cut and paste and not IN MY OWN WORDS
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp2PUIRR_mwv.pgp
Description: PGP
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:32:36 AM, you wrote:
RH i am out of this thread - you continue to strip the context out of
RH quotes and this is *not* a complete, uncutted console input/output
There is no point in posting superfluous stuff!
Yum has clearly stated that
Package
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:30 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:15:50 AM, you wrote:
RH pack them in your own
RH words
Further the original quotes are cut and paste and not IN MY OWN WORDS
you don't get it - the *context* is important and only visible by *any*
Am 23.11.2014 um 11:41 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:32:36 AM, you wrote:
RH i am out of this thread - you continue to strip the context out of
RH quotes and this is *not* a complete, uncutted console input/output
There is no point in posting
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:49:01 AM, you wrote:
RH looking 2 seconds on the output below (you stripped originally)
The original pst included-
Package perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 set to be updated
RH i
RH see you system want to install i386 packages on a x86_64 setup
That
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:44:09 AM, you wrote:
RH you don't get it - the *context* is important
You don't get it in your own words is stating that I have rewritten the
output myself and what I quoted was not was was on the screen!
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Am 23.11.2014 um 12:03 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:49:01 AM, you wrote:
RH looking 2 seconds on the output below (you stripped originally)
The original pst included-
Package perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 set to be updated
i am working for a decace now
Am 23.11.2014 um 12:05 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 10:44:09 AM, you wrote:
RH you don't get it - the *context* is important
You don't get it in your own words is stating that I have rewritten the
output myself and what I quoted was not was was on the
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 11:21:56 AM, you wrote:
RH frankly your whole quoting style is just *rude*
That's damn rich!
RH but after seeing the mess with Fedora packages on CentOS
As you well know that was suggested by another list member!
RH in wich context you confirmed a
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 11:15:27 AM, you wrote:
RH he old RHEL5
CentOS 5 doesn't go end of life until 2017
RH seeing even fc6 packages
Only if offered by-
base: repo.bigstepcloud.com
* epel: mirror.bytemark.co.uk
* extras: anorien.csc.warwick.ac.uk
* rpmforge:
Am 23.11.2014 um 14:11 schrieb Niamh Holding:
RH realize that this is *not* the mailing list for OS problems
I guess only a dumb blonde would think it appropriate to ask about
spamassassin not performing DNS checks on the spamassassin list
the spamassassin part of the issue was explained and
Hello Reindl,
Sunday, November 23, 2014, 4:54:44 PM, you wrote:
RH the spamassassin part of the issue was explained
But no fix provided, as far as I'm concerned everything that follows is
in pursuit of working DNS checks and when that is achieved then further
discussion would indeed be off
Hello Reindl,
Is you message supposed to contain some hidden meaningful information given
that all it does it give some details of your setup?
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:55:41 PM, you wrote:
RH Bignum.pm
RH Am 11.11.2014 um 15:48 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11,
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 12:21:19 PM, you wrote:
A is your SA 3.4 working now?
The backup server here is now working after the ISP removed the block on
incoming port 53.
The main server arrived here by courier yesterday and I'm busy kicked the
RAID1 array so it doesn't boot
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A yum update -y reboot
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp8EQI2ai_Ns.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A yum update -y reboot
Oh and no reboot despite
Complete!
Broadcast message from root (pts/1) (Wed Nov 12 08:15:55 2014):
The system is going down for reboot NOW!
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A yum update -y reboot
And bind downgraded from 9.9.2P1 to 9.3.6P1
Some update, wonder what else has been downgraded?
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpMUjQVsjZWE.pgp
Description:
On 11/12/2014 09:20 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A yum update -y reboot
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
ok.. not so tragic... Old centos, old SA version - form now on no more
SA setup from yum
On 11/12/2014 09:29 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A yum update -y reboot
And bind downgraded from 9.9.2P1 to 9.3.6P1
Some update, wonder what else has been downgraded?
you need a consistent Centos setup - later you can update
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:29:16 AM, you wrote:
A you'll have to do some manual work and the install SA 3.4 from source
That's how I have always installed SA
A you will need a spam init script
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
# Options to spamd
SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
--
On 11/12/2014 09:38 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:29:16 AM, you wrote:
A you'll have to do some manual work and the install SA 3.4 from source
That's how I have always installed SA
A you will need a spam init script
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
#
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:41:04 AM, you wrote:
A Just make sure you yum remove spamassassin or you'll have a mix/mess
Yes, though why yum updated stuff it didn't install is a mystery to me.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
A yum update -y reboot
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
ok.. not so tragic... Old centos, old SA version - form now on no more
SA setup from yum
You can use yum to install SA from the Fedora project, if you use Copr:
On November 12, 2014 9:20:04 AM Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
Just rememeber to do this with
On November 12, 2014 9:32:46 AM Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
You've neglected updating for so many years, this should be a lesson.
Keep away from precompiled problems is my rule and this includes windows :)
Am 12.11.2014 um 10:05 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:41:04 AM, you wrote:
A Just make sure you yum remove spamassassin or you'll have a mix/mess
Yes, though why yum updated stuff it didn't install is a mystery to me
yum don't touch anything which is not installed as
Hello Reindl,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:42:57 AM, you wrote:
RH yum don't touch anything which is not installed as RPM
SA was always built from source!
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpR7Vn45_D6t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:04:26 AM, you wrote:
BP Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
BP step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
SA has always been built from source here.
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Am 12.11.2014 um 12:51 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:42:57 AM, you wrote:
RH yum don't touch anything which is not installed as RPM
SA was always built from source!
frankly don't *premature stop reading* if you don't want others stop
explaining you your own
On 11/12/2014 12:52 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:04:26 AM, you wrote:
BP Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
BP step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
SA has always been built from source here.
is
On 11/12/2014 01:21 PM, Axb wrote:
On 11/12/2014 12:52 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:04:26 AM, you wrote:
BP Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from
cpan, next
BP step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
SA has always
On November 12, 2014 12:52:45 PM Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
BP Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
BP step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
Rpm.spec files tells what other rpms is needed, same does cpan, if perl is
installed
Hello
Seems like since the last rules update DNS rules aren't being checked
given that 209.85.216.51 is listed in list.dnswl.org the relevant rule
should show-
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;51.216.85.209.list.dnswl.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
51.216.85.209.list.dnswl.org. 28800 IN A
On 11/11/2014 12:20 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello
Seems like since the last rules update DNS rules aren't being checked
given that 209.85.216.51 is listed in list.dnswl.org the relevant rule
should show-
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;51.216.85.209.list.dnswl.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:20:59 AM, I wrote:
NH Seems like since the last rules update DNS rules aren't being checked
Last update-
Nov 10 04:23:02.028 [3867] dbg: dns: 0.4.3.sought.rules.yerp.org =
3402014020421, parsed as 3402014020421
Nov 10 04:23:02.333 [3867] dbg: dns:
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DNS checks not being performed-
References: 1366719437.2014112...@fullbore.co.uk
In-Reply-To: 1366719437.2014112...@fullbore.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:59:05 AM, you wrote:
NH RBL rules hit... but they aren't showing under normal checks.
That message of mine has-
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
mail
* domains are different
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:26:50 AM, you wrote:
A what do you see
maillog shows
Nov 11 12:15:16 nitrogen spamd[26862]: spamd: connection from 127.0.0.1
[127.0.0.1]:46489 to port 783, fd 5
Nov 11 12:15:16 nitrogen spamd[26862]: spamd: setuid to spamtest succeeded
Nov 11
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 12:20:31 PM, you wrote:
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 414.
$sock = $io_socket_module_name-new(%args);
And a quick test script suggests that
$io_socket_module_name = IO::Socket::INET6
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Niamh Holding wrote:
spamd[26862]: spamd: connection from 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:46489 to
port 783, fd 5
spamd[26862]: spamd: setuid to spamtest succeeded
spamd[26862]: spamd: processing message
2014121508.3321875.277...@sailthru.com for spamtest:1028
spamd[26862]: plugin: eval failed:
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 1:55:42 PM, you wrote:
MM Start spamd with option -D dns and compare its dns debuging
So what's the command instead of service spamassassin start?
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpc5cY9k_gpO.pgp
On 11/11/2014 03:01 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 1:55:42 PM, you wrote:
MM Start spamd with option -D dns and compare its dns debuging
So what's the command instead of service spamassassin start?
You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:11:39 PM, you wrote:
A You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to the spamassassin
A init script
So
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd $SPAMDOPTIONS -r $SPAMD_PID
becomes
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd -D dns $SPAMDOPTIONS -r $SPAMD_PID
or do I set
On 11/11/2014 03:26 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:11:39 PM, you wrote:
A You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to the spamassassin
A init script
So
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd $SPAMDOPTIONS -r $SPAMD_PID
becomes
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd -D dns
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A should do the trick...
service spamassassin start logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29407]: Can't locate Crypt/OpenSSL/Bignum.pm in
@INC (@INC contains:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
A should do the trick...
And a message logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29407]: Can't locate Crypt/OpenSSL/Bignum.pm in
Bignum.pm
Am 11.11.2014 um 15:48 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
A should do the trick...
And a message logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41
On 11/11/2014 9:48 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
A should do the trick...
And a message logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:51:14 PM, you wrote:
KAM These two sound like you are missing Perl modules for SA. Not sure if
KAM they are relevant but they definitely irk me. Are you installing from
KAM source or from a package?
From source, but 3.4.0 was working fine until
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 15:11 +0100, Axb wrote:
You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to the spamassassin
init script
(depending on your distro it may be /etc/init.d/spamassassin)
On current Fedora Linux systems /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin contains a
single line:
SPAMDOPTIONS=-c
Hello Martin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:10 PM, you wrote:
MG In Fedora 18 SA is managed this way, so editing
MG /etc/sysconfig/spamassasin is the best way to do it for Linuxes that
MG use sysVinit daemon management.
Cheers, probably the same for CentOS
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Martin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:10 PM, you wrote:
MG Start by seeing if your setup has a copy of /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin.
OK startup now logs -
Nov 11 15:06:25 nitrogen spamd[29594]: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
Nov 11 15:06:28 nitrogen spamd[29849]:
On 11/11/2014 9:59 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:51:14 PM, you wrote:
KAM These two sound like you are missing Perl modules for SA. Not sure if
KAM they are relevant but they definitely irk me. Are you installing from
KAM source or from a package?
From
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:12 PM, you wrote:
KAM I would start with
KAM cpan Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA and see if you don't find a bunch of module
dependencies.
Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA is up to date.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
On 11/11/2014 10:40 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:12 PM, you wrote:
KAM I would start with
KAM cpan Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA and see if you don't find a bunch of module
dependencies.
Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA is up to date.
Did that fix the BigNum and RSA
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:08:49 PM, you wrote:
NH OK startup now logs -
And a message check logs-
Nov 11 15:41:42 nitrogen spamd[29852]: spamd: connection from 127.0.0.1
[127.0.0.1]:59387 to port 783, fd 5
Nov 11 15:41:42 nitrogen spamd[29852]: spamd: setuid to spamtest
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:46:51 PM, you wrote:
KAM Did that fix the BigNum and RSA error you logged?
No
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpesAE2KAyQJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:51:14 PM, you wrote:
KAM These two sound like you are missing Perl modules for SA. Not sure if
KAM they are relevant but they definitely irk me. Are you installing from
KAM source or from a package?
On 11.11.14 14:59, Niamh Holding wrote:
From source, but 3.4.0
Hello Matus,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:02:33 PM, you wrote:
MUf what exactly do you install from source: perl or SA?
SA on 30 Oct 2014
MUf ...What did you do yesterday?
23 4 * * * sa-update -D --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
--channel updates.spamassassin.org
Is your IO::Socket::IP at version 0.21 or older?
$ perl -le 'use IO::Socket::IP; print IO::Socket::IP-VERSION'
0.21 CHANGES:
* Ensure that IO::Socket-new( Domain = ... ) definitely returns a
socket in the right family
Mark
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:19:28 PM, you wrote:
MM perl -le 'use IO::Socket::IP; print IO::Socket::IP-VERSION'
Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
Am 11.11.2014 um 17:24 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:19:28 PM, you wrote:
MM perl -le 'use IO::Socket::IP; print IO::Socket::IP-VERSION'
Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
BEGIN
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:02:33 PM, you wrote:
MUf what exactly do you install from source: perl or SA?
On 11.11.14 16:10, Niamh Holding wrote:
SA on 30 Oct 2014
MUf ...What did you do yesterday?
23 4 * * * sa-update -D --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --channel
Hello Matus,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:47:10 PM, you wrote:
MUf ... as it was already said: do NOT mix manually installed CPAN modules with
MUf packages of any kind. use either one or the other.
so don't use yum and cpan?
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Niamh Holding wrote:
MUf ... as it was already said: do NOT mix manually installed CPAN
modules with
MUf packages of any kind. use either one or the other.
so don't use yum and cpan?
Well, you probably can - if you are careful.
But using an 8 years old version of perl you'd be safer with
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:24:23 PM, you wrote:
NH Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
OK, looks like it's using
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm
But
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:12 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:24:23 PM, you wrote:
NH Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
OK, looks like it's using
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:27:05 PM, you wrote:
RH not install software on random locations
RH * especially not in the root's homedir
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
RH BTW: what is the Re: ***UNCHECKED(Encrypted)*** in
On 11/11/2014 07:12 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:24:23 PM, you wrote:
NH Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
OK, looks like it's using
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:33 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:27:05 PM, you wrote:
RH not install software on random locations
RH * especially not in the root's homedir
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
*you*
--On November 11, 2014 at 7:38:08 PM +0100 Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
*you* wrote
OK, looks like it's using
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:43 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On November 11, 2014 at 7:38:08 PM +0100 Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
*you* wrote
OK, looks like it's using
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:38:08 PM, you wrote:
RH *you* wrote
And you made an accusation...
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpGURXZr8Iud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:49 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:38:08 PM, you wrote:
RH *you* wrote
And you made an accusation...
you mis-use the word accusation
i just read the infos you offer and bring them in a context - in fact
until now nobody knows where
Reindl Harald wrote:
BTW: what is the Re: ***UNCHECKED(Encrypted)*** in your subjects?\
Sorry, my fault. Forgot to remove this from a Subject when replying.
It was added here because the posting includes a PGP signature
and the file(1) utility cannot distinguish a PGP/GPG encrypted
message
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.4
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp9XHgbBFk2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:46:37 PM, you wrote:
RH so mentioning /root/.cpan/build/ make sno sense at all
find / -name Socket.pm
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp51oScErvzv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:55:22 PM, you wrote:
RH nobody knows where you expect Socket.pm loaded from base
so where tells me which is loaded?
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpXUw5neK_Ve.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 11/11/2014 08:06 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.4
here's an idea:
remove the
/root/.cpan/ dir...
Update your ancient Centos version
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
This yum update might be connected to the problem...
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpARfMki3D5J.pgp
Description: PGP
On 11/11/2014 08:25 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
This yum update might be connected to the problem...
Which means? Did you run an update or not?
Pls be specific to
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:29:57 PM, you wrote:
A Which means? Did you run an update or not?
Fail to paste error!
Nov 09 13:15:19 Updated: 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgplxkltbXGIG.pgp
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:20:36 PM, you wrote:
A Update your ancient Centos version to Centos 5.11
That's scary... given the server is in a data centre 250 miles away!
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpzrFhHwg7hr.pgp
On 11/11/2014 08:41 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:20:36 PM, you wrote:
A Update your ancient Centos version to Centos 5.11
That's scary... given the server is in a data centre 250 miles away!
real men hug their teddy before doing yum update and patching
Am 11.11.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:20:36 PM, you wrote:
A Update your ancient Centos version to Centos 5.11
That's scary... given the server is in a data centre 250 miles away!
you should subscribe to the CentOS list
it's multiple times explained
Am 11.11.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:29:57 PM, you wrote:
A Which means? Did you run an update or not?
Fail to paste error!
Nov 09 13:15:19 Updated: 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64
besides my previous mail about how to handle CenTOS:
it is *very*
On November 11, 2014 8:48:53 PM Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
yum update -y reboot
good luck send us a postcard...
emerge @world echo cpan not needed in gentoo :)
94 matches
Mail list logo
