On 19/09/2009 3:33 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/16/2009 11:47 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the
On 09/16/2009 11:47 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
cheers!
--j.
-rw-r--r-- 174911850
On Wednesday September 16 2009 22:03:17 Justin Mason wrote:
Who is running a mass-check that's still in progress? (fwiw, I am ;)
It'll be at least 5 users (with myself and John), but that's not a
great population of training data.
I spent a couple of afternoons cleaning up my corpus or 60.000
On 09/16/2009 11:25 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
excellent. That's 2 people who could do with an extension, then!
Could we state with clarity the new deadline? I might have other people
with data depending on the extended deadline.
Austin,
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should be able to scan my
million or so messages in a day on my cluster.
Wow, that makes me feel inadequate :) I'm struggling to clean up my
little ham sample of 3600 messages, and looking at another couple
thousand that I'll do if I've
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:34:24PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Austin,
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should be able to scan my
million or so messages in a day on my cluster.
Wow, that makes me feel inadequate :) I'm struggling to clean up my
little ham sample of 3600
On 09/17/2009 08:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Austin,
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should be able to scan my
million or so messages in a day on my cluster.
Wow, that makes me feel inadequate :) I'm struggling to clean up my
little ham sample of 3600 messages, and looking at
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:01, Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2009 11:25 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
excellent. That's 2 people who could do with an extension, then!
Could we state with clarity the new deadline? I might have other people
with data depending on the extended
On Sep 16, 2009, at 22:13, Austin messaging.director...@gmail.com
wrote:
It had one header: Subject. Then a body. Should
I leave stuff like this in? I mean, it is ham, but...
My feeling would be if it is local only then don't include it.
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 22:13, Austin messaging.director...@gmail.com wrote:
It had one header: Subject. Then a body. Should
I leave stuff like this in? I mean, it is ham, but...
My feeling would be if it is local only then don't include it.
Agreed.
--
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 22:13, Austin messaging.director...@gmail.com wrote:
It had one header: Subject. Then a body. Should
I leave stuff like this in? I mean, it is ham, but...
My
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
cheers!
--j.
-rw-r--r-- 174911850 2009/09/16 01:03:40 ham-bayes-net-hege.log
Warren Togami wrote:
One day from the deadline for spamassassin-3.3.0 scoring and we
currently have only three people reporting.
Would love to help, but my current mail environment isn't conducive to
keeping a corpus of mail to feed the tests.
Would it be worth contributing data from a brand-new corpus of mail
from the last few days? That's the best I can do presently.
I have plenty of dreams of creating a good, hand verified, corpus of
mail from the last several months, but the development work keeps
getting bumped...
On Wed, Sep
On 09/16/2009 01:01 PM, Austin wrote:
Would it be worth contributing data from a brand-new corpus of mail
from the last few days? That's the best I can do presently.
I have plenty of dreams of creating a good, hand verified, corpus of
mail from the last several months, but the development work
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 15:47, Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
cheers!
I've definitely got the volume required. I'm currently selecting a
random sample of 1% of my site's inbound outbound mail on both ham
spam sides, and will still be reviewing the corpus for several (many?)
hours today to make sure it's clean. I'll see how soon I can get all
of the pieces in
On 16/09/2009 4:03 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Who is running a mass-check that's still in progress? (fwiw, I am ;)
I had a NAS failure over the weekend that consumed the time I was
planning on getting my systems right up-to-date for the mass-check. I
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should
excellent. That's 2 people who could do with an extension, then!
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 20:16, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
spamassas...@dostech.ca wrote:
On 16/09/2009 4:03 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Who is running a mass-check that's still in progress? (fwiw, I am ;)
I had a NAS failure over the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
spamassas...@dostech.ca wrote:
[snip]
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should be able to scan my
million or so messages in a day on my cluster.
Wow, that makes me feel inadequate :) I'm struggling to clean up my
little ham sample of
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
cheers!
--j.
21 matches
Mail list logo
